Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Just get on with improving palliative care, plead experts

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ November 06, 2017 189 (44) E1376; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5519
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Canada should follow through on existing plans for improving palliative care instead of wasting time developing new definitions and frameworks, experts told the Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. The Senate is studying Bill C-277, which would see the government develop a framework to promote access to palliative care and consider re-establishing a palliative care secretariat at Health Canada. The bill won unanimous support in the House of Commons.

But according to Dr. José Pereira, scientific officer for the advocacy group Pallium Canada, there’s no need to “reinvent frameworks, as they are already in place.” Resurrecting Canada’s secretariat on end-of-life care, however, would provide “focus, attention and much needed visibility,” he said.

The federal government previously funded the development of a 2013 framework by the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (CHPCA). Provinces have endorsed and are already using that plan, CHPCA Executive Director Sharon Baxter told senators. “They just need the initiative funding to get it to actually happen.”

Senators also questioned why it’s necessary for the federal government to redefine palliative care when there’s already consensus among health professionals. The bill’s sponsor, Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu, agreed that the government “doesn’t need to begin with a blank page,” and the bill directs them to reference previous frameworks. The intent of the bill is to set “minimum standards of what will be covered everywhere,” she said.

Senators also expressed concern that the House replaced requirements to ensure access and implement the framework with more neutered directions to “promote” access and “support” the framework. Gladu explained that the government wanted to avoid jurisdictional issues. “The federal government can play a role in leadership, in setting standards, in providing funding,” but it’s the provinces and territories’ job to deliver health services.

Figure

The federal government doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel to improve access to palliative care, witnesses told a senate committee.

Image courtesy of Obencem/iStock

Amending the bill would mean sending it back to the House of Commons, she added. “One would hope it would receive unanimous support again but, politics being what they are, we can never be sure.”

Timing is important because the provinces and territories are still deciding how to use $6 billion in federal funding for home care and palliative care. “If the federal government waits too long, the provinces will all have something different in place, with different standards, and then it becomes difficult,” Gladu said.

Coverage for palliative care already varies widely across the country, she said. “In some provinces, 43% of palliative care in hospices is covered — in other provinces, not at all.” In places lacking publicly covered palliative care, people end up in emergency departments at exorbitant cost to the health system.

“An acute bed costs $1200 a day; think of that compared to hospice care, which is about $300 a day, or home care, which is about $200 a day,” Gladu said.

However, senators and expert witnesses questioned whether this really represents a cost-saving if patients have to pay for hospice and home care out of pocket. “Many people don’t understand, if it’s at home, that they’re paying for it unless they’ve got private health care,” said Senator Jane Cordy.

Footnotes

  • Posted on cmajnews.com on Oct. 19, 2017.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (44)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 44
6 Nov 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Just get on with improving palliative care, plead experts
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Just get on with improving palliative care, plead experts
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Nov 2017, 189 (44) E1376; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5519

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Just get on with improving palliative care, plead experts
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Nov 2017, 189 (44) E1376; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5519
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Not another consultation process: a critique of the implementation of Bill C-277 Framework on Palliative Care in Canada
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Not another consultation process: a critique of the implementation of Bill C-277 Framework on Palliative Care in Canada
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • End-of-life care & decisions
    • Health services

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire