Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Physicians disagree on legal age for cannabis

Jay Rankin
CMAJ January 30, 2017 189 (4) E174-E175; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095378
Jay Rankin
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Eighteen or twenty-one? As Canada moves closer to legalizing marijuana, two physician associations disagree on the right legal age to buy and smoke the drug.

The Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation’s framework report advocates for a Canada-wide legal age of 18, leaving it to provinces and territories to set a higher age if they like.

Eighteen is too early, maintains the Canadian Medical Association (CMA), which is adamant the age be 21 years. Medical evidence indicates marijuana is detrimental to development of the human brain, a process that doesn’t stop until the mid-20s.

“In a perfect world what we would recommend based solely on the scientific evidence is an age of legalization of 25,” said Dr. Jeff Blackmer, CMA vice president of medical professionalism.

A study in the Journal of the International Neuropsychology Society reported that “even after a month of monitored abstinence, adolescent marijuana users demonstrate subtle neuropsychological deficits compared with nonusers.”

Another study, published in Psychopharmacology in 2014, supported by the United States National Institute of Drug Abuse, found that “early onset of [marijuana] use negatively impacts white matter development and is associated with behavioural impulsivity, a combination that may have enduring negative effects, particularly on the developing brain.”

Restricting use to an older age, says Blackmer, also helps to “prevent young people having to go to black market and illicit sources, and all the issues with contamination with fentanyl.” After assessing the available evidence, CMA recommended a mid-range limit of 21.

The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS), on the other hand, agrees with the age limit suggested by the task force. “Yes, 21 based on the brain studies is better than 18,” said Dr. Christina Grant, part of the CPS adolescent health committee, which coauthored a study that looked at potential harm to youth. “But the actual brain studies don’t delineate at what age the risk trade off would actually be best. And what about all the youths using anyways?”

Figure

Medical evidence indicates marijuana is detrimental to development of the human brain, a process that doesn’t stop until the mid-20s.

Image courtesy of diego_cervo/iStock

Canada ranked the highest among 29 developed nations for cannabis use in children aged 11–15, according to a 2013 UNICEF report. More recently, in 2015, a survey from the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health indicated that 21.3% of students from grade 7–12 used marijuana. Young adults aged 20–24 are 2.5 times more likely to smoke cannabis than those 25 or older, according to the 2013 Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey.

“They’re the biggest users and they’re the most vulnerable,” Grant said of the 20–24 age group. “So, just by limiting to 21, they’re still going to use it. But if it’s regulated, if there are disincentives like the taxes and increased costs for the highest potency, that’s positive.”

In addition to pricing disincentives, the federal task force recommends keeping dispensaries away from schools and ensuring that smoke-free laws apply to cannabis to mitigate the effects of second-hand smoke. It also suggests that cannabis packaging be mandated to use plain labels that detail potency, and strain of plant.

Grant said the CPS was happy with many of the task force’s recommendations, including measures to curb driving under the influence of the drug and a ban on edible forms of marijuana — including candies — which have led to accidental overdose by toddlers in the US.

It’s now up to the “legislative process to decide what parts of their report and what recommendations will be implemented and which ones will not,” said Blackmer. “We think they’ve done a really good job of getting things started.”

Medical groups aren’t the only ones opining on the correct legal age. On Dec.15, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told the press that he thought marijuana should be available to people at the same age they can legally drink alcohol, which is either 18 or 19, depending upon where they live in Canada. His comment came just two days after the task force recommended 18 years of age.

The government has vowed to legalize the drug, which has been on the list of prohibited substances since 1923, in the spring of 2017. While the country waits on legalization, police can still lay criminal charges for possession, as well as for selling without a Health Canada license for medical marijuana.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 4
30 Jan 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physicians disagree on legal age for cannabis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physicians disagree on legal age for cannabis
Jay Rankin
CMAJ Jan 2017, 189 (4) E174-E175; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095378

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physicians disagree on legal age for cannabis
Jay Rankin
CMAJ Jan 2017, 189 (4) E174-E175; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095378
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Longer family medicine residency: Boon or bane to doctor supply?
  • The evolving picture of long COVID
  • When are shared decisions false choices?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Cannabis

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire