Emergency response capacity in the Canadian North was in the national spotlight in the summer of 2016 as the largest cruise ship to date, the Crystal Serenity, navigated from Alaska to New York via the Northwest Passage. The journey raised concerns about Canada’s capacity to respond to any large-scale disaster in the Arctic given limited infrastructure and the challenges of remoteness.1 Indeed, in 2010, the Clipper Adventurer ran aground about 100 km east of Kugluktuk, Nunavut, requiring that 128 passengers be evacuated, which strained emergency systems.1 Yet, such events that garner widespread public attention should also serve to highlight persistent gaps in the emergency medical care available to Inuit communities living in the Canadian North, and spur interventions to improve resilience and access to services.
Medical emergencies in Canada’s North, particularly those that occur outside of established communities, illustrate some of the most dramatic health disparities experienced in Canada. In the Canadian Arctic, rates of unintentional injury are estimated to be 3.7 times the national average (72.5:100 000 v. 19.8:100 000), with elevated rates of all-terrain vehicle and snowmobile injuries, drowning and asphyxiation compared with southern Canada (proportionate injury ratios of 1.93 and 1.52, respectively).2,3 Searchand-rescue incidents have more than doubled over the past decade, with a rate of roughly 14.1:1000 noted in Nunavut in 2015, which suggests an increasing burden.4
Most of Canada’s 60 000 Inuit live in one of 53 communities spread along its northern coastline. In these communities, travel and hunting on the land, ice and water are regular activities that are central to well-being, cultural identity and food security. Trips “on the land” can range from day-trips to a cabin by all-terrain vehicle, snowmobile or boat, to multiday trips to harvesting grounds, cultural sites or neighbouring communities. For anyone stranded because of a vehicle breakdown or injured from a fall through the ice, barriers in access to definitive medical care can be life threatening. Of 543 incidents above 55°N latitude in 2014, 20% of the people involved were either dead or in critical condition on arrival at a health care facility (Figure 1).5 Prehospital medical care, however, is almost nonexistent across the region, with no ground advanced life support prehospital care in any of the three territories. Furthermore, only 29% of communities in the territories have ambulances, most of which are at a first-responder level.6,7 In most locations, definitive medical care requires transport in personal vehicles, by snowmobile or by all-terrain vehicle to community health centres by volunteers who, at best, have basic first aid knowledge.8–10
Arctic search and rescues in 2014. Map produced by authors with data from the National Search and Rescue Secretariat (NSS).5 Content and data are from the Public Safety Canada Search and Rescue Knowledge Management System and Statistics Canada Digital Boundary files from 2006.
Although community health centres can treat minor injuries, most do not have the capacity to care for major traumas, which means that aeromedical evacuation to regional hubs or southern hospitals is required.
Climate change is expected to alter the Canadian Arctic profoundly, with the region anticipated to have ice-free summers within the next half century, in addition to increasingly unpredictable storm activity. Environmental changes will affect hazards as sea ice seasons shift, ice thickness changes, iceberg abundance increases and weather becomes more unpredictable.11,12 A recent case–control study of 202 search and rescues in Nunavut showed a strong link between sea ice, temperature and probability of an incident,4 while risks of navigating in poorly charted Arctic waters are well known.1,12 It is only a matter of time before a major incident occurs.
In light of current disparities and clear future challenges, it is essential that we take stock of emergency response capacities in the Canadian Arctic and develop robust policies at local, regional and national levels that are adapted to climate change and the pressing health needs of the region. Improved governance and funding, to address gaps in search-and-rescue services and in local capacity for advanced life support prehospital care in the territories, is urgently required.8,9 Efforts to prevent incidents and emergencies, also key to addressing health inequalities, will require investment in and collaboration with Inuit communities. Opportunities for intervention include promotion of intergenerational exchange of traditional knowledge that has long underpinned safe and respectful use of the Arctic environment; removal of barriers to harvesting and land use activities; and evaluation of the use of new technologies for reducing risks associated with land use, including unmanned aerial vehicles and social network solutions.9 Such actions would serve to reduce health inequalities between southern and northern Canada, and will enhance communities’ resilience into the future.
KEY POINTSWide disparities in both rates of unintentional injury and access to search-and-rescue services and emergency medical care exist between southern and northern Canada.
Recent high-profile events in the Northwest Passage have drawn attention to the potential for a large-scale disaster in the Canadian Arctic.
In the emergency medical care available to Inuit communities living in the Canadian North, interventions to improve resilience — particularly in the face of the effects of climate change — and access to emergency medical response services are needed.
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
This article has been peer reviewed.
Contributors: Dylan Clark conceived the idea and framing of the article. Both of the authors collaborated on the first draft and revisions of the article, and approved the final version to be published.
Funding: James Ford is supported by an Applied Public Health Chair from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and ArcticNet. Dylan Clark and James Ford are funded by a CIHR Community-Based Primary health care team grant (grant no. TT6-128271).