Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Trends in deceased organ donation in Canada

Sam D. Shemie
CMAJ September 25, 2017 189 (38) E1204-E1205; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170988
Sam D. Shemie
Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montreal Children’s Hospital, McGill University Health Centre & Research Institute; McGill University; Deceased Organ Donation, Canadian Blood Services, Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sam.shemie@mcgill.ca
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

See related article at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.161043

KEY POINTS
  • The recent observed improvements in deceased organ donation and transplant rates in Ontario and Canada are almost entirely based on the implementation of donation after circulatory death (DCD).

  • There have been demographic shifts in the cause of death before organ donation, with a decreasing incidence of traumatic brain injury. Anoxic brain injury after resuscitated cardiac arrest has become a leading cause of death that results in deceased organ donation.

  • Key elements of system improvement in organ donation are implementing DCD, hiring of donation-focused personnel (physicians and nurse coordinators) and the legal requirement to identify and refer all potential donors.

  • Increases in resuscitated cardiac arrest will also increase organ donation.

Organ donation and transplantation represent the juxtaposition of the inevitable death of an organ donor with the preventable death of a potential recipient. After decades of stagnant performance, the organ donation and transplantation system in Canada was criticized as being fragmented and in need of redesign.1 With concerted effort at provincial and national levels, the system in Canada has recently shown a sustained incremental improvement,2 improving the access to life-saving transplants for Canadians in need of organs.

Canada was a late adopter of donation after circulatory death (DCD) originally called “non–heart-beating” donation,3 compared with other countries, owing to early ethical concerns and resistance from the Canadian critical care community.4 Through a comprehensive deliberation and multidisciplinary consensus process in 2005, Canada developed the medical, ethical and legal framework for DCD, which was subsequently supported by the Canadian Critical Care Society.5 Ontario was an early adopter of the framework. In linked research, Rao and colleagues, comparing Ontario data on the demographics of organ donors, utilization rates, transplantation and time from hospitalization to death,6 find a rise in numbers of transplants in the province over a 12-year period that is almost entirely attributable to DCD. This important finding is instructive for the country. Substantial variation in organ donation rates between provinces still exists2 and can be explained largely by variable degree of DCD implementation.

Following the criticisms of a decade ago, the performance of the organ donation and transplantation system in Canada has improved considerably. Each year, increasing numbers of Canadians and their families compassionately and benevolently agree to organ donation at the time of the tragic loss of a loved one. The period from 2006 to 2015 saw a 42% increase in total number of deceased donors and a 31% increase in deceased donor transplants.2 In our complex health care system, this has been the result of collaborative efforts between hospitals, intensive care units, emergency departments, provincial organ donation organizations, transplant programs, professional societies representing critical care and transplantation, and Canadian Blood Services, the agency tasked by the federal and provincial governments to coordinate the donation and transplant system (https://blood.ca/sites/default/files/otdt-indx-final-c2a.pdf).

The linked research emphasizes the vital contribution of DCD to Canadian transplant rates and the shifting demographics of deceased donors.6 In contrast, a large observational study in southern Alberta found a declining incidence of brain death, especially in those with head trauma, and a shift toward anoxic brain injury after resuscitated cardiac arrest was the main cause of neurologic death.7 These findings have implications for the availability of organs for transplantation in patients with end-stage organ failure. Any increases in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitated cardiac arrest, although intended to save the patient’s life, will also increase anoxic brain injury and organ donation. Recent reports of a rise in organ donation associated with the tragic opioid epidemic in North America provide evidence of this.8

Organs from donors with anoxic brain injury after resuscitated cardiac arrest are more likely to have had preceding anoxic-ischemic injury, which means that fewer organs are transplanted. Specific to DCD, an increase in warm ischemic injury to organs during the dying process is associated with delayed graft function after kidney transplantation, ischemic cholangiography after liver transplantation and inability to transplant the arrested DCD heart.9 Organ utilization, or the number of transplants per donor, is lower with DCD than with donation after neurologic death (2.37 v. 3.38).6 An increase in the rate of DCD will increase the number of transplants, but with less efficiency than donation after neurologic death and, at times, with lower-quality transplant outcomes. Reassuringly, the widening availability of ex-vivo organ reperfusion techniques and adoption of techniques used in successful DCD heart transplantation internationally10 may mitigate this issue in Canada.

Although there are many elements fundamental to improving the organ donation system, the factors that have most impact are hiring donation-focused personnel (physicians and nurse coordinators), legally requiring all potential donors to be identified and referred, and implementing DCD.2 The different Alberta7 and Ontario experiences6 are of interest in evaluating the impact of DCD on neurologic determination of death. Before southern Alberta implemented DCD and because at the time it did not have a donation physician program, the region had witnessed a decrease in the incidence in brain death.11 Ontario has seen an increase in both DCD and donation following brain death and temporally in association with implementing donation physicians.12 This suggests that implementation of a DCD program in association with intensive care unit physicians who are focused on donation therefore drives the improvement of all forms of deceased organ donation.

Can DCD programs reduce brain death and inadvertently lead to a decrease in the number of transplantable organs, particularly hearts? If they did, this would imply that donors after circulatory death die earlier than donors with neurologic death; i.e., before the devastating brain injury can deteriorate to brain death. The linked study from Ontario seems to show the opposite. Mean length of hospital stay before declaration of neurologic death in donors was 2.7 days versus 6.0 days before withdrawal of life support and subsequent asystole in donors following circulatory death. The authors conclude that there is no evidence that the use of DCD was pre-empting potential donations following neurologic death. This conclusion would be strengthened if the comparative time to death had been adjusted for the specific cause of brain injury (e.g., anoxic brain injury).

Canada’s gradual improvement in donation and transplant rates, although gratifying, will require ongoing and increasing effort. The 2015 rate of 18.2 donors per million population2 remains well below estimates of donor potential, which range from 40–50 by provincial death audit reports (www.cmq.org/publications/index.aspx?s=don+d%27organe&p=1) to 89, estimated by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (www.cihi.ca/web/resource/en/organdonorpotential_2014_en.pdf). Recent evolving trends in the demographics of deceased organ donation are noteworthy for Canada and informative for future investment in the system by health care organizations, funders and policy-makers.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Sam Shemie reports that in addition to being a member of the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Montreal Children’s Hospital McGill University Health Centre & Research Institute, and Professor of Pediatrics, McGill University, he is the Medical Advisor for Deceased Organ Donation at Canadian Blood Services.

  • This article was solicited and has not been peer reviewed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gill JS,
    2. Klarenbach S,
    3. Cole E,
    4. et al
    . Deceased organ donation in Canada: an opportunity to heal a fractured system. Am J Transplant 2008;8:1580–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Organ donation and transplantation in Canada: system progress report 2006–2015. Ottawa: Canadian Blood Services; 2016. Available: https://blood.ca/sites/default/files/ODT_Report.pdf (accessed 2017 Aug. 21).
  3. ↵
    1. Knoll GA,
    2. Mahoney JE
    . Non-heart-beating organ donation in Canada: Time to proceed? CMAJ 2003;169:302–3.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Rocker GM
    . Organ and tissue donation in the intensive care unit. CMAJ 2002;167:1248–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Shemie SD,
    2. Baker AJ,
    3. Knoll G,
    4. et al
    . National recommendations for donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada: donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. CMAJ 2006;175:S1.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Rao V,
    2. Dhanani S,
    3. Maclean J,
    4. et al
    . Effect of organ donation after circulatory determination of death on number of organ transplants from donors with neurologic determination of death. CMAJ 2017;189:E1206–11.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Kramer AH,
    2. Zygun DA,
    3. Doig CJ,
    4. et al
    . Incidence of neurologic death among patients with brain injury: a cohort study in a Canadian health region. CMAJ 2013; 185:E838–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Goldberg DS,
    2. Blumberg E,
    3. McCauley M,
    4. et al
    . Improving organ utilization to help overcome the tragedies of the opioid epidemic. Am J Transplant 2016;16:2836–41.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Hernadez-Alejandro R,
    2. Wall W,
    3. Jevnikar A,
    4. et al
    . Organ donation after cardiac death: donor and recipient outcomes after the first three years of the Ontario experience. Can J Anaesth 2011;58:599–605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Macdonald PS
    . Heart transplantation from DCD donors: from the bedside to the bench. Transplantation 2017;101:1753–4.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Kramer AH,
    2. Baht R,
    3. Doig CJ
    . Time trends in organ donation after neurologic determination of death: a cohort study. CMAJ Open 2017;5:E19–27.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Shemie SD,
    2. MacDonald S
    Canadian Blood Services — Canadian Critical Care Society Expert Consultation Group. Improving the process of deceased organ and tissue donation: a role for donation physicians as specialists. CMAJ 2014;186:95–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (38)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 38
25 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Trends in deceased organ donation in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Trends in deceased organ donation in Canada
Sam D. Shemie
CMAJ Sep 2017, 189 (38) E1204-E1205; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170988

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Trends in deceased organ donation in Canada
Sam D. Shemie
CMAJ Sep 2017, 189 (38) E1204-E1205; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170988
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Effect of organ donation after circulatory determination of death on number of organ transplants from donors with neurologic determination of death
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Addressing organ shortages: progress in donation after circulatory death for liver transplantation
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
  • Antiracism as a foundational competency: reimagining CanMEDS through an antiracist lens
  • Keeping the front door open: ensuring access to primary care for all in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire