Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Contact dermatitis caused by methacrylates in nail products

Samuel DeKoven and D. Linn Holness
CMAJ September 18, 2017 189 (37) E1193; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170264
Samuel DeKoven
Doctor of Medicine Program (DeKoven), Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ont.; Division of Occupational Medicine (DeKoven, Holness), Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital; Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Medicine (Holness), University of Toronto; Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Holness), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sdekoven2018@meds.uwo.ca
D. Linn Holness
Doctor of Medicine Program (DeKoven), Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ont.; Division of Occupational Medicine (DeKoven, Holness), Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital; Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Medicine (Holness), University of Toronto; Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Holness), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 33-year-old woman presented to the patch test clinic with eczema around the nail folds of both hands, which appeared 12 hours after having shellac nail polish applied at a nail salon (Figure 1). The patient reported that she had had similar reactions with artificial gel nails two years earlier, which subsided when she stopped using artificial nails.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1:

Dermatitic eruption of the nail folds caused by methacrylate contact dermatitis from shellac nail polish in a 33-year-old woman with nail polish removed.

On examination, there was mild redness and scale around her nails. Patch testing with the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Standard Series and an acrylate and methacrylate series revealed reactions to multiple acrylates and methacrylates. We made a diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis caused by her nail products.

Methacrylates are compounds found in all artificial sculpted nails and shellac nail polish. They are also commonly found in dental materials and orthopedic bone cement.1 Increasingly, methacrylates are becoming common contact allergens among consumers and nail technicians.1 About 2.6% of patients with contact dermatitis react to hydroxyethyl methacrylate (the most commonly sensitizing methacrylate) on patch testing.2 The nail salon industry is estimated to generate over $8 billion annually in the United States; in a 2014 survey, over 93% of salons offered gel nail products containing methacrylates.3

The differential diagnosis for dermatitis affecting the nail folds includes psoriasis, tinea manuum, irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. Diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis is confirmed by patch testing; physicians should refer patients who use or work with nail products for testing if they present with dermatitis of the nail fold or fingertip.

If contact allergy has been identified, patients must avoid all methacrylates because of substantial cross-reactivity and co-sensitization between various methacrylates.1

In the workplace, nail technicians can reduce risk by avoiding use of methacrylates. If use cannot be eliminated, technicians may use more protective glove materials such as nitrile, double glove when working with products containing methacrylate and change gloves frequently.1

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr. Joel DeKoven for his help with crafting and revision of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Samuel DeKoven received a summer research studentship grant from the Centre for Research Expertise in Occupational Disease, which is funded by the Ontario Ministry of Labour. No other competing interests were declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • The authors have obtained patient consent.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Muttardi K,
    2. White IR,
    3. Banerjee P
    . The burden of allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 2016;75:180–4.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. DeKoven JG,
    2. Warshaw EM,
    3. Belsito DV,
    4. et al
    . North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results 2013–2014. Dermatitis 2017;28:33–46.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Nails Magazine big book 2014–2015. Nails Magazine 2015. Available: http://files.nailsmag.com/Market-Research/NABB2014-2015-Stats-2-1.pdf (accessed 2017 Aug. 4).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (37)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 37
18 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contact dermatitis caused by methacrylates in nail products
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Contact dermatitis caused by methacrylates in nail products
Samuel DeKoven, D. Linn Holness
CMAJ Sep 2017, 189 (37) E1193; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170264

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Contact dermatitis caused by methacrylates in nail products
Samuel DeKoven, D. Linn Holness
CMAJ Sep 2017, 189 (37) E1193; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170264
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgement
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Phthiriasis palpebrarum
  • Penicillin allergy delabelling in pregnancy
  • Penicillin allergy delabelling of patients at risk of sexually transmitted infections in primary care
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire