Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

No immediate plans to build new CMA HQ

Wendy Glauser
CMAJ July 17, 2017 189 (28) E948-E949; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095449
Wendy Glauser
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The once-celebrated, modernist Canadian Medical Association (CMA) national headquarters in Ottawa is no longer standing. With the CMA House demolished last fall, the Ottawa site is currently a fenced-in vacant lot. And plans to rebuild are now up in the air, leading some to question the justification for tearing it down in the first place.

CMA representatives said last year that the association would be erecting a new structure on the property; they’d put out a request for proposals and selected an architecture firm. But the deal appears to have fallen through.

In an emailed statement, CMA media spokesperson Ziad Saab wrote, “as of now, there are no plans for construction of a new building.” Still, the CMA “intends to retain ownership” of the property at 1867 Alta Vista Drive, according to Saab. He adds the organization is continuing “to explore future options for its use.” No one at the CMA agreed to be interviewed.

In May 2016, CMA CEO Tim Smith told CMAJ that “the costs to renovate were close to, if not more than, tearing down and rebuilding. And the reason [for the demolition] is because the building codes have changed so much.” Smith did not make the consultant’s analysis public. In the recent statement, Saab explained that the problems with the building “posed escalating safety concerns for staff” and “the cost for remediation and renovation proved to be prohibitive.”

Figure1

CMA House, a 43 000 square foot modernist structure which opened in 1970, was demolished in 2016 due to high renovation costs. A new structure was slotted to be built.

Image courtesy of Barbara Sibbald

Despite this explanation, not everyone agrees the building needed to be demolished. Robert Smythe, an urban planning writer in Ottawa, said “I wonder how realistic and costed the plans for a new building actually were. The CMA’s destruction of a landmark building, the environmental wastage, and their abandonment of an architecturally distinctive presence in the national capital is deeply disappointing.”

Allan Teramura, an Ottawa architect and past president of the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada, also thinks the CMA acted in haste. The tear down was “an affront to the leadership of the people who built it, who thought they were making an investment for the future,” he says. “It’s like committing doctor-assisted suicide on someone who has a good prognosis.”

At the time it was being constructed, the CMA described the building, designed by architecture firm Webb Zerafa Menkes Housden, as a “balance between respect for tradition and a strong emphasis on the future.”

CMA employees are currently working in office space in the east end of Ottawa and will later this year be moved to the MD Financial management building at 1870 Alta Vista, across from the site of the former headquarters, which, according to Saab, provides sufficient office space for CMA staff.

Though in need of costly repairs, the CMA House, with its Brutalist and International style aspects, was well loved by architecture buffs. “It was almost suburban in its setting,” says Annmarie Adams, an architectural history professor at McGill University. “It had a kind of swanky, Mad Men appeal.”

“It was built with fairly high quality materials that are not commonly used anymore,” says Teramura. The Corten steel cladding was one such material. It’s treated so that it will corrode, but only on the surface, creating a unique — but expensive — rust look.

Figure2

CMA House is demolished, but there are now no plans to rebuild.

Image courtesy of Barbara Sibbald

However, Teramura at the Royal Architectural Institute of Canada is not particularly surprised by the decision. The building was 46 years old, making it “old enough to have some costly issues, but not old enough to be venerated and worthy of investment.” If the building was 80 years old, Teramura says, there likely would have been enough public outcry to save it.

The move is part of a larger trend for major institutions to cut spending on public-facing architecture, says Teramura. With banks, for example, “they used to be important buildings in neighbourhoods,” he says. “Nowadays they rent space in commercial buildings and don’t give much thought to having a presence on the street,” he says.

At one time, medical associations were also among society’s contributors to city jewels. As one example, Adams points to the 12-storey Art Deco structure built by the British Medical Association in Sydney, Australia, still revered today. The building “stood for the strong presence of British medicine in Australia, something like a business club,” Adams said.

The American Medical Association is investing in its street presence even today. In 2011, it moved into a 1960 landmark building designed by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, situated on the Chicago River.

Whatever the CMA decides to do with the vacant lot, the former CMA House sets a high bar for design. “It had a very dignified presence about it,” says Teramura.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (28)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 28
17 Jul 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No immediate plans to build new CMA HQ
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
No immediate plans to build new CMA HQ
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Jul 2017, 189 (28) E948-E949; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095449

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
No immediate plans to build new CMA HQ
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Jul 2017, 189 (28) E948-E949; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1095449
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Medical trainees warn practice permits will drive away doctors
  • Coupons for health care a sign of creeping privatization?
  • Canada’s health system is among the least green
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire