Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Caring for young carers in Canada

Nicholas Chadi and Vivian Stamatopoulos
CMAJ July 17, 2017 189 (28) E925-E926; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170145
Nicholas Chadi
Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children (Chadi), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (Stamatopoulos), University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nicholas.chadi@umontreal.ca
Vivian Stamatopoulos
Division of Adolescent Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children (Chadi), Toronto, Ont.; Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities (Stamatopoulos), University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data from Statistics Canada show that 1.18 million young carers aged 15 to 24 provide some level of unpaid care-giving for a family member with long-term illness, disability, cognitive impairment or health problems related to aging.1 Of this number, 10% spend 20 hours or more providing care each week, helping with activities of daily living, such as dressing, laundry and bathing, and/or more complex tasks, such as organizing medical appointments or financial planning. There are young carers in every community in Canada, but they are often invisible to their peers, teachers and health care providers. Caregiving can be a positive experience, but when unsupported, young carers are at high risk of social, academic, and mental and physical health difficulties.2

The aging of the Canadian population, combined with an overburdened public health care system, is creating a high demand for family caregivers. The movement of women into the workplace in the past decades has made it more challenging for families to care for their elders at home and has led to an increased reliance on younger caregivers.3 In the context of limited resources in health care, supporting young carers is a strategic investment in the future health and well-being of a large group of Canadian youth.

The number of young carers in Canada is increasing. The three waves of Canadian census data that included questions on unpaid care showed a 13.5% increase in the number of youth aged 15 to 24 who provided care between 1996 and 2006.1 Similar to Australian and United Kingdom data, young girls in Canada provide most unpaid caregiving and, in line with the Australian data, there is a growing feminization of this care as these youth age.1 Currently, only three programs provide targeted support for Canadian young carers (two in Ontario and one in British Columbia). Services offered through these programs include support groups, respite care, skill-building groups, and summer leadership camps for young carers. Funding for all three of these programs is precarious and relies mostly on grants and philanthropy.3

Lack of support for young carers is an important global problem, but countries like the UK, Australia and the United States have taken meaningful steps to meet the needs of young carers.4,5 In the UK, young carers have legal rights as “Carers” under the Care Act, which affords them access to more than 350 dedicated young carer programs and “direct payments” in lieu of services.6 Programs provide a range of information, respite, education and counselling-based services to children and youth up to the age of 25. In England, the Children and Families Act (2014) recognizes that young people who care for persons with cognitive impairments, mental illness or substance abuse disorder may also be at risk for violent assault and sexually inappropriate behaviour, and accounts for such concerns by mandating a formal “needs assessment” for each formally recognized young carer and their particular caregiving situation.6

In Canada, a tiny minority of young carers has access to direct caregiver support services; in the UK, 1 in 14 young carers accesses such supports.3 Accumulating research offers evidence that formal support for young carers has positive impacts on mood and anxiety symptoms, as well as on functioning at school or in the workplace.7

Although Australian young carers do not share the same breadth of rights and entitlements as young carers in the UK, they have partial legal rights in select jurisdictions and many have access to educational and social service programming. After research showed Australian young carers were less likely than their peers to be studying or employed full time, the federal Young Carer Bursary Programme was launched in 2015 to increase their opportunities to remain in school.5

In 2003, the US Administration on Aging funded the first national survey of “youth caregivers,” which opened the way for research on the impacts of caregiving in youth.8 However, despite the documentation of more than 1.4 million child caregivers between the ages of 8 and 18 years, dedicated young carer programming is limited mainly to Florida.8 The remaining states provide varying assistance only to those caregivers aged 18 and older.

In the US, support for young carers emerged from the interest and advocacy work of nurses9 and pediatricians.10 Physicians can help to identify caregiving youth. Physicians should be aware that young carers may show symptoms of exhaustion, confusion, anger and depression, and that their development and health may become compromised, creating an additional burden on the health and social services.10 Physicians can advocate for increasing the funding and capacity of community organizations that provide services for young carers. As it stands, funding limitations for the nonprofit and community sector severely affect the breadth and scope of Canadian young carer programs.3 In Canada, we need legal instruments and policies to acknowledge the importance of young carers and actively support their health and well-being. Existing federal caregiver supports should be expanded beyond their current tax credit–based system so they benefit young carers and not only working adult caregivers. The current lack of support for young carers in Canada results in a failure to live up to international obligations to promote and protect the rights and well-being of young people.11

There are young carers in classrooms, medical practices and communities across Canada. Many young carers are proud of the care they provide and view it as a positive experience. However, risks emerge when the caregiving begins to interfere with normal child and adolescent development. A first step for physician advocacy could be as simple as asking young people, “Do you provide care or support for a family member or loved one, either in or outside your home?”, or writing a short letter to a school teacher or employer to inform them that a youth is a young carer who requires special accommodations owing to caring responsibilities.

KEY POINTS
  • Young carers are younger than 25 and provide substantial care to family members with illness or disability.

  • There are more than 185 000 young carers in Canada aged 15 to 24 who provide 15 or more hours of weekly unpaid caregiving to people with long-term illness, disability or problems related to aging.

  • When unsupported, young carers are at high risk for social, academic, and mental and physical health difficulties.

  • Programs and legislation in the UK, Australia and some parts of the US have led to improved supports for young carers.

  • By recognizing the needs of young carers and advocating for an increase in the support services available to them, physicians can play a key role in promoting the health and well-being of young carers.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Contributors: Nicholas Chadi and Vivian Stamatopoulos drafted the initial manuscript, revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Stamatopoulos V
    . One million and counting: the hidden army of young carers in Canada. J Youth Stud 2015;18:809–22.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Charles G,
    2. Marshall S,
    3. Stainton T
    . Demographics profiles and initial results from the British Columbia young carers study. Relational Child and Youth Care Practice 2010;23:64–7.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Stamatopoulos V
    . Supporting young carers: a qualitative review of young carer services in Canada. Int J Adolesc Youth 2015;21:178–94.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Becker S
    . Global perspectives on children’s unpaid caregiving in the family: research and policy on “young carers” in the UK, Australia and sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Soc Policy 2007;7:23–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Cass B,
    2. Smyth C,
    3. Hill T,
    4. et al
    . Young carers in Australia: understanding the advantages and disadvantages of their care giving. Social Policy Research Paper No. 38. Canberra (Australia): Australian Government — Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; 2009.
  6. ↵
    Children and Families Act 2014: Chapter 6. London (UK): The Stationery Office; 2014.
  7. ↵
    1. Clay D,
    2. Connors C,
    3. Day N,
    4. et al
    . The lives of young carers in England: qualitative report to DfE. Darlington (UK): Department for Education; 2016.
  8. ↵
    1. Kavanaugh MS,
    2. Stamatopoulos V,
    3. Cohen D,
    4. et al
    . Unaknowledged caregivers: a scoping review of research on caregiving youth in the United States. Adolescent Res Rev 2016;1:29.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Brandt P,
    2. Weinert C
    . Children’s mental health in families experiencing multiple sclerosis. J Fam Nurs 1998;4:41–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Barber M,
    2. Siskowski C
    . Youth caregivers: unrecognized providers of care. Pediatrics 2008;121:873–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Bednar V,
    2. Chadi N,
    3. DeCourcey M,
    4. et al
    . Who cares about young carers? Raising awareness for an invisible population. Action Canada Task Force Report. Ottawa: Action Canada; 2013.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (28)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 28
17 Jul 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Caring for young carers in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Caring for young carers in Canada
Nicholas Chadi, Vivian Stamatopoulos
CMAJ Jul 2017, 189 (28) E925-E926; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170145

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Caring for young carers in Canada
Nicholas Chadi, Vivian Stamatopoulos
CMAJ Jul 2017, 189 (28) E925-E926; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170145
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ensuring timely genetic diagnosis in adults
  • The case for improving the detection and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea following stroke
  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire