Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station

Giulia M. Muraca, Yasser Sabr, Sarka Lisonkova, Amanda Skoll, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W. Cundiff and K.S. Joseph
CMAJ June 05, 2017 189 (22) E764-E772; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.161156
Giulia M. Muraca
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gmuraca@cfri.ca
Yasser Sabr
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarka Lisonkova
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Skoll
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rollin Brant
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geoffrey W. Cundiff
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K.S. Joseph
School of Population and Public Health (Muraca, Lisonkova, Joseph); Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Muraca, Sabr, Lisonkova, Skoll, Cundiff, Joseph); Department of Statistics (Brant), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Sabr), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Derivation of the cohort for this study. The sum of individual exclusions may exceed the total at each point because some deliveries were excluded for multiple reasons. *Excluding Quebec. †Midpelvic OVD v. cesarean delivery indicated for dystocia. ‡Midpelvic OVD v. cesarean delivery indicated for fetal distress. OVD = operative vaginal delivery.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Effects of midpelvic operative vaginal delivery (compared with cesarean delivery in labour) on composite severe perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, and trauma among women with and without a prolonged second stage of labour. (A) Women with dystocia and (B) women with fetal distress. AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    No. of deliveries by mode, and by maternal, infant and obstetric characteristics among women delivering term singletons by midpelvic operative vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery with labour in Canada* from 2003 to 2013

    Maternal/neonatal characteristicNo. of deliveries (% of total no. of deliveries per characteristic level)†
    n = 187 234
    Total no. of deliveries per characteristic levelp value
    Attempted midpelvic forceps
    n = 24 274
    Attempted midpelvic vacuum
    n = 23 525
    Attempted midpelvic sequential
    n = 4012
    Cesarean
    n = 135 423
    Maternal age, yr< 0.001
    < 20888 (11.3)1001 (12.8)199 (2.5)5758 (73.4)7846
    20–243359 (11.8)3545 (12.5)676 (2.4)20 821 (73.3)28 401
    25–297850 (13.6)7242 (12.6)1376 (2.4)41 198 (71.4)57 666
    30–348144 (13.5)7670 (12.7)1236 (2.1)43 194 (71.7)60 244
    35–393447 (12.6)3413 (12.5)437 (1.6)20 070 (73.3)27 367
    ≥ 40586 (10.3)654 (11.5)88 (1.5)4382 (76.7)5710
    Parity< 0.001
    015 881 (13.6)13 905 (11.9)2673 (2.3)84 561 (72.3)117 020
    12310 (10.8)4765 (22.2)415 (1.9)13 970 (65.1)21 460
    2–3577 (8.6)1783 (26.5)128 (1.9)4253 (63.1)6741
    ≥ 467 (6.0)282 (25.1)17 (1.5)759 (67.5)1125
    Missing5439 (13.3)2790 (6.8)779 (1.9)31 880 (78.0)40 888
    Previous cesarean< 0.001
    Yes51 (2.1)49 (2.0)17 (0.7)2297 (95.2)2414
    No24 223 (13.1)23 476 (12.7)3995 (2.2)133 126 (72.0)184 820
    Gestational age, wk< 0.001
    37–384007 (14.5)4347 (15.7)587 (2.1)18 675 (67.6)27 616
    39–4120 267 (12.7)19 178 (12.0)3425 (2.1)116 748 (73.1)159 618
    Birth weight, g< 0.001
    < 2500208 (8.1)354 (13.8)26 (1.0)1979 (77.1)2567
    2500–29992671 (14.1)3310 (17.3)367 (1.9)12 641 (66.6)18 989
    3000–399917 868 (13.8)16 927 (13.1)3001 (2.3)91 849 (70.8)129 645
    ≥ 40003527 (9.8)2934 (8.1)618 (1.7)28 954 (80.4)36 033
    Epidural< 0.001
    Yes20 924 (15.3)16 747 (12.2)3159 (2.3)95 941 (70.2)136 771
    No3350 (6.6)6778 (13.4)853 (1.7)39 482 (78.2)50 463
    Indication< 0.001
    Dystocia10 017 (13.1)6401 (8.3)1572 (2.1)58 765 (76.6)76 755
    Fetal distress14 257 (12.9)17 124 (15.5)2440 (2.2)76 658 (69.4)110 479
    Prolonged 2nd stage of labour< 0.001
    Yes7855 (27.2)4887 (16.9)1147 (4.0)15 034 (52.0)28 923
    No16 419 (10.4)18 638 (11.8)2865 (1.8)120 389 (76.0)158 311
    Successful OVD‡ trial (% of all OVD)< 0.001
    Dystocia8611 (86.0)4849 (75.8)1094 (69.6)––
    Fetal distress12 836 (90.0)15 549 (90.8)1874 (76.8)––
    • Note: OVD = operative vaginal delivery.

    • ↵* Excludes the province of Quebec.

    • ↵† Unless specified otherwise.

    • ↵‡ Successful OVDs express the no. (%) of successful OVDs in a specific category divided by the no. of attempted OVDs in that category stratified by indication (dystocia or fetal distress).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Perinatal and maternal outcomes by attempted midpelvic operative vaginal and cesarean deliveries with dystocia and prolonged second stage of labour (n = 17 484)*†

    OutcomeNo. (%) of cesarean deliveries
    n = 9300
    Attempted midpelvic forceps delivery
    n = 4741
    Attempted midpelvic vacuum delivery
    n = 2780
    Attempted midpelvic sequential operative vaginal delivery
    n = 663
    No. (%)AOR (95% CI)No. (%)AOR (95% CI)No. (%)AOR (95% CI)
    Severe perinatal morbidity/mortality61 (0.7)52 (1.1)1.81 (1.24 to 2.64)32 (1.2)1.81 (1.17 to 2.80)13 (2.0)3.19 (1.73 to 5.88)
     Stillbirth0 (0.0)0 (0.0)–< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–
     Neonatal death0 (0.0)< 5 (< 0.1)–< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–
     Neonatal convulsion16 (0.2)8 (0.2)0.98 (0.42 to 2.29)†††6 (0.2)1.26 (0.49 to 3.21)†††< 5 (< 0.8)1.76 (0.40 to 7.65)†††
     Assisted ventilation (endotracheal)35 (0.4)10 (0.2)0.55 (0.27 to 1.13)9 (0.3)0.80 (0.38 to 1.67)< 5 (< 0.8)0.74 (0.18 to 3.08)
     Severe birth trauma‡16 (0.2)35 (0.7)5.01 (2.75 to 9.15)19 (0.7)4.47 (2.27 to 8.80)9 (1.4)9.46 (4.11 to 21.8)
    Respiratory distress§302 (3.3)188 (4.0)1.25 (1.04 to 1.51)116 (4.2)1.29 (1.03 to 1.61)47 (7.1)2.29 (1.66 to 3.16)
    Assisted ventilation¶140 (1.5)63 (1.3)0.81 (0.60 to 1.10)37 (1.3)0.79 (0.54 to 1.14)12 (1.8)1.12 (0.61 to 2.05)
    Fetal asphyxia23 (0.3)9 (0.2)0.77 (0.36 to 1.66)†††< 5 (< 0.2)0.44 (0.13 to 1.45)†††< 5 (< 0.8)1.22 (0.29 to 5.19)†††
    Birth asphyxia19 (0.2)8 (0.2)0.83 (0.36 to 1.89)†††12 (0.4)2.12 (1.03 to 4.37)†††< 5 (< 0.8)1.48 (0.34 to 6.36)†††
    Intracranial hemorrhage due to hypoxia< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.1)1.96 (0.28 to 13.9)†††8 (0.3)13.4 (2.85 to 63.2)†††< 5 (< 0.8)14.1 (1.98 to 100)†††
    Cardiac failure/dysrhythmia120 (1.3)67 (1.4)1.09 (0.80 to 1.47)47 (1.7)1.14 (0.80 to 1.62)18 (2.7)1.91 (1.15 to 3.18)
    Severe cerebral morbidity**16 (0.2)18 (0.4)2.21 (1.13 to 4.34)†††< 5 (< 0.2)0.42 (0.10 to 1.82)†††< 5 (< 0.8)3.52 (1.17 to 10.6)†††
    Birth trauma††194 (2.1)304 (6.4)3.23 (2.68 to 3.88)307 (11.0)5.40 (4.47 to 6.52)100 (15.1)7.92 (6.11 to 10.3)
    Meconium aspiration syndrome11 (0.1)9 (0.2)1.61 (0.67 to 3.88)†††10 (0.4)3.05 (1.29 to 7.19)†††< 5 (< 0.8)2.56 (0.57 to 11.6)†††
    Bacterial sepsis29 (0.3)28 (0.6)1.90 (1.13 to 3.20)†††6 (0.2)0.69 (0.29 to 1.67)†††0 (0.0)–
    Severe maternal morbidity/mortality153 (1.7)83 (1.8)1.19 (0.91 to 1.57)38 (1.4)0.87 (0.60 to 1.25)13 (2.0)1.26 (0.71 to 2.25)
     Maternal death0 (0.0)0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
     Severe postpartum hemorrhage‡‡97 (1.0)64 (1.4)1.51 (1.09 to 2.09)26 (0.9)0.92 (0.59 to 1.44)13 (2.0)2.00 (1.10 to 3.62)
     Shock< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.1)0.98 (0.18 to 5.36)†††< 5 (< 0.2)0.84 (0.09 to 7.49)†††0 (0.0)–
     Sepsis20 (0.2)8 (0.2)0.78 (0.35 to 1.78)†††5 (0.2)0.84 (0.31 to 2.23)†††0 (0.0)–
     Cardiac complication§§36 (0.4)7 (0.2)0.38 (0.17 to 0.86)†††6 (0.2)0.56 (0.23 to 1.32)†††0 (0.0)–
     Acute renal failure< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.1)–< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–
     Obstetric embolism5 (0.1)0 (0.0)–< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–
     Evacuation incisional hematoma< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.1)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
    Obstetric trauma¶¶589 (6.3)1085 (22.9)4.51 (4.04 to 5.02)427 (15.4)2.70 (2.35 to 3.09)147 (22.2)4.24 (3.46 to 5.19)
     Perineal laceration 3rd/4th degree< 5 (< 0.1)888 (18.7)–341 (12.3)–135 (20.4)–
     Uterine incision extension268 (2.9)13 (0.3)0.11 (0.06 to 0.19)21 (0.8)0.29 (0.18 to 0.46)< 5 (< 0.8)0.06 (0.01 to 0.40)
    Postpartum infection***126 (1.4)34 (0.7)0.54 (0.37 to 0.79)22 (0.8)0.60 (0.38 to 0.95)8 (1.2)0.87 (0.42 to 1.80)
    Postpartum hemorrhage668 (7.2)792 (16.7)2.77 (2.48 to 3.10)323 (11.6)1.61 (1.39 to 1.86)111 (16.7)2.54 (2.03 to 3.17)
    • Note: AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, CNS = central nervous system, PNS = peripheral nervous system.

    • ↵* Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, with cesarean delivery as the reference group.

    • ↵† All models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, birth weight, previous cesarean delivery, province and fiscal year.

    • ↵‡ We included intracranial laceration and hemorrhage, skull fracture, severe injury to the CNS, severe injury to the PNS, long bone injury, subaponeurotic (subgaleal) hemorrhage, and injury to the liver and spleen.

    • ↵§ We included respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn and other neonatal respiratory distress.

    • ↵¶ We included resuscitation, chest compression, endotracheal respiratory assistance, mechanical respiratory assistance, forced oxygenation, intubation, mechanical ventilation and drugs for resuscitation.

    • ↵** We included hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral ischemia, cerebral irritability and cerebral depression.

    • ↵†† We included intracranial hemorrhage/laceration, and injury to the CNS/PNS, scalp and skeleton.

    • ↵‡‡ We included a combination of postpartum hemorrhage and transfusion codes.

    • ↵§§ We included cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism.

    • ↵¶¶ We included severe perineal lacerations (3rd/4th degree), cervical laceration, high vaginal laceration, injury to pelvic organ/joint, pelvic hematoma and extension of uterine incision.

    • ↵*** We included sepsis, infection of obstetric surgical wound, infection of the genital tract following delivery, infection of the urinary tract following delivery, infections of the genitourinary tract following delivery, pyrexia of unknown origin following delivery and other specified puerperal infection.

    • ↵††† Crude OR is reported because AOR was undefined owing to small numbers.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Perinatal and maternal outcomes by attempted midpelvic operative vaginal and cesarean deliveries with fetal distress and prolonged second stage of labour (n = 11 439)*†

    OutcomeNo. (%) of cesarean deliveries
    n = 5734
    Attempted midpelvic forceps delivery
    n = 3114
    Attempted midpelvic vacuum delivery
    n = 2107
    Attempted midpelvic sequential operative vaginal delivery
    n = 484
    No. (%)AOR (95% CI)No. (%)AOR (95% CI)No. (%)AOR (95% CI)
    Severe perinatal morbidity/mortality103 (1.8)68 (2.2)1.26 (0.92 to 1.72)39 (1.9)1.01 (0.69–1.48)21 (4.3)2.62 (1.15 to 4.06)
     Stillbirth0 (0.0)0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
     Neonatal death< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
     Neonatal convulsions23 (0.4)7 (0.2)0.56 (0.24 to 1.31)†††6 (0.3)0.71 (0.29 to 1.74)†††< 5 (< 1.0)1.03 (0.24 to 4.38)†††
     Assisted ventilation (endotracheal)80 (1.4)29 (0.9)0.64 (0.42 to 0.98)15 (0.7)0.44 (0.25 to 0.76)8 (1.7)1.13 (0.54 to 2.37)
     Severe birth trauma‡9 (0.2)37 (1.2)10.4 (4.84 to 22.5)22 (1.0)9.05 (3.97 to 20.6)12 (2.5)24.3 (9.72 to 60.8)
    Respiratory distress§386 (6.7)197 (6.3)0.95 (0.79 to 1.13)133 (6.3)0.97 (0.79 to 1.20)48 (9.9)1.54 (1.12 to 2.12)
    Assisted ventilation¶198 (3.5)67 (2.2)0.59 (0.45 to 0.79)49 (2.3)0.57 (0.41 to 0.78)17 (3.5)0.91 (0.55 to 1.51)
    Fetal asphyxia63 (1.1)18 (0.6)0.53 (0.32 to 0.91)17 (0.8)0.69 (0.40 to 1.19)7 (1.5)1.33 (0.60 to 2.94)
    Birth asphyxia26 (0.5)12 (0.4)0.85 (0.43 to 1.69)†††6 (0.3)0.63 (0.26 to 1.53)†††< 5 (< 1.0)0.91 (0.22 to 3.85)†††
    Intracranial hemorrhage due to hypoxia< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.2)0.92 (0.17 to 5.03)†††< 5 (< 0.2)1.36 (0.25 to 7.44)†††< 5 (< 1.0)2.97 (0.33 to 26.6)†††
    Cardiac failure/dysrhythmia209 (3.6)172 (5.5)1.54 (1.25 to 1.90)80 (3.8)0.90 (0.69 to 1.18)38 (7.9)2.09 (1.45 to 3.00)
    Severe cerebral morbidity**17 (0.3)7 (0.2)0.76 (0.31 to 1.83)†††7 (0.3)1.12 (0.46 to 2.71)†††5 (1.0)3.51 (1.29 to 9.56)†††
    Birth trauma††154 (2.7)253 (8.1)3.26 (2.65 to 4.02)269 (12.8)5.09 (4.13 to 6.28)99 (20.5)9.47 (7.18 to 12.5)
    Meconium aspiration syndrome92 (1.6)34 (1.1)0.70 (0.47 to 1.04)43 (2.0)1.33 (0.91 to 1.94)7 (1.5)1.02 (0.47 to 2.24)
    Bacterial sepsis43 (0.8)23 (0.7)0.99 (0.59 to 1.64)12 (0.6)0.76 (0.40 to 1.44)< 5 (< 1.0)0.55 (0.13 to 2.27)
    Severe maternal morbidity/ mortality125 (2.2)53 (1.7)0.78 (0.56 to 1.09)26 (1.2)0.52 (0.33 to 0.80)7 (1.5)0.62 (0.29 to 1.35)
     Maternal death0 (0.0)0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
     Severe postpartum hemorrhage‡‡72 (1.3)42 (1.4)1.09 (0.74 to 1.61)21 (1.0)0.73 (0.44 to 1.22)< 5 (< 1.0)0.61 (0.22 to 1.69)
     Shock< 5 (< 0.1)0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
     Sepsis21 (0.4)5 (0.2)0.44 (0.17 to 1.16)†††< 5 (< 0.2)0.13 (0.02 to 0.96)†††< 5 (< 1.0)0.56 (0.08 to 4.20)†††
     Cardiac complication§§28 (0.5)6 (0.2)0.41 (0.17 to 1.00)< 5 (< 0.2)0.36 (0.12 to 1.04)< 5 (< 1.0)0.90 (0.21 to 3.86)
     Acute renal failure< 5 (< 0.1)0 (0.0)–< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–
     Obstetric embolism5 (0.1)0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
     Evacuation incisional hematoma< 5 (< 0.1)< 5 (< 0.2)–0 (0.0)–0 (0.0)–
    Obstetric trauma¶¶464 (8.1)710 (22.8)3.34 (2.94 to 3.80)329 (15.6)1.99 (1.71 to 2.33)111 (22.9)3.23 (2.55 to 4.08)
    Perineal laceration 3rd/4th degree< 5 (< 0.1)567 (18.2)–270 (12.8)–88 (18.2)–
    Uterine incision extension219 (3.8)16 (0.5)0.13 (0.08 to 0.22)†††7 (0.3)0.08 (0.04 to 0.18)†††11 (2.3)0.59 (0.32 to 1.08)†††
    Postpartum infection***112 (2.0)28 (0.9)0.46 (0.30 to 0.70)16 (0.8)0.42 (0.25 to 0.72)5 (1.0)0.53 (0.21 to 1.31)
    Postpartum hemorrhage491 (8.6)533 (17.1)2.20 (1.92 to 2.51)262 (12.4)1.41 (1.19 to 1.66)73 (15.1)1.77 (1.35 to 2.31)
    • Note: AOR = adjusted odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, CNS = central nervous system, PNS = peripheral nervous system.

    • ↵* Adjusted odds ratios were estimated using logistic regression, with cesarean delivery as the reference group.

    • ↵† All models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, birth weight, previous cesarean delivery, province and fiscal year.

    • ↵‡ We included intracranial laceration and hemorrhage, skull fracture, severe injury to the CNS, severe injury to the PNS, long bone injury, subaponeurotic (subgaleal) hemorrhage, and injury to the liver and spleen.

    • ↵§ We included respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnea of the newborn and other neonatal respiratory distress.

    • ↵¶ We included resuscitation, chest compression, endotracheal respiratory assistance, mechanical respiratory assistance, forced oxygenation, intubation, mechanical ventilation and drugs for resuscitation.

    • ↵** We included hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, cerebral ischemia, cerebral irritability and cerebral depression.

    • ↵†† We included included intracranial hemorrhage/laceration, and injury to the CNS/PNS, scalp and skeleton.

    • ↵‡‡ We included a combination of postpartum hemorrhage and transfusion codes.

    • ↵§§ We included cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism.

    • ↵¶¶ We included severe perineal lacerations (3rd/4th degree), cervical laceration, high vaginal laceration, injury to pelvic organ/joint, pelvic hematoma and extension of uterine incision.

    • ↵*** We included sepsis, infection of obstetric surgical wound, infection of the genital tract following delivery, urinary tract infection following delivery, genitourinary tract infections following delivery, pyrexia of unknown origin following delivery and other specified puerperal infection.

    • ↵††† Crude OR is reported because AOR was undefined owing to small numbers.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 189 (22)
CMAJ
Vol. 189, Issue 22
5 Jun 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Podcast

Subscribe to podcast
Download MP3

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station
Giulia M. Muraca, Yasser Sabr, Sarka Lisonkova, Amanda Skoll, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W. Cundiff, K.S. Joseph
CMAJ Jun 2017, 189 (22) E764-E772; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.161156

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality after attempted operative vaginal delivery at midpelvic station
Giulia M. Muraca, Yasser Sabr, Sarka Lisonkova, Amanda Skoll, Rollin Brant, Geoffrey W. Cundiff, K.S. Joseph
CMAJ Jun 2017, 189 (22) E764-E772; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.161156
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Acknowledgement
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Beware selection bias
  • The end of forceps deliveries?
  • Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study
  • Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma
  • Taking a stand for operative vaginal delivery
  • Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity
  • Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station
  • Response to "Data limitations may affect conclusions in study of vaginal delivery at midpelvic station"
  • Beware selection bias
  • The authors reply to "The end of forceps deliveries?" and "Beware selection bias"
  • The end of forceps deliveries?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Development and validation of a hospital frailty risk measure using Canadian clinical administrative data
  • The effect of changing screening practices and demographics on the incidence of gestational diabetes in British Columbia, 2005–2019
  • Self-reported sleep disturbances among people who have had a stroke: a cross-sectional analysis
Show more Research

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire