Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Safety of fentanyl initiation according to past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches

Kevin J. Friesen, Cornelius Woelk and Shawn Bugden
CMAJ June 14, 2016 188 (9) 648-653; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150961
Kevin J. Friesen
College of Pharmacy (Friesen, Bugden) Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Department of Family Medicine (Woelk), College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cornelius Woelk
College of Pharmacy (Friesen, Bugden) Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Department of Family Medicine (Woelk), College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shawn Bugden
College of Pharmacy (Friesen, Bugden) Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba; Department of Family Medicine (Woelk), College of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shawn.bugden@umanitoba.ca
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Proportion of patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches, 2001–2012, by level of previous opioid exposure (% of recommended opioid dose in the 60 days before fentanyl initiation). Previous opioid use ranged from 0% (no opioid history) to ≥ 100% (safe initiation of fentanyl). The vertical dashed lines represent when warnings or advisories were issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (a and f),11,12 Health Canada (b and i),13,18 the Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada (d, e, h and j)14–17 and professional journals (c and g).19,20

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of patients newly prescribed the fentanyl patch, 2001–2012

    CharacteristicNo. (%)
    n = 11 063
    Sex
    Female6884 (62.2)
    Male4179 (37.8)
    Age group, yr
    ≤ 644692 (42.4)
    65–741894 (17.1)
    75–842500 (22.6)
    ≥ 851977 (17.9)
    Initial dose of fentanyl patch, μg/h
    121293 (11.7)
    257739 (70.0)
    501459 (13.2)
    75363 (3.3)
    100209 (1.9)
    Prior opioid exposure*
    Single-entity LA opioid2956 (26.7)
    Single-entity IR opioid1889 (17.1)
    Oxycodone/acetaminophen1289 (11.7)
    Codeine/acetaminophen2406 (21.7)
    No exposure2523 (22.8)
    • Note: IR = immediate release, LA = long acting.

    • ↵* Mutually exclusive groups of patients categorized by highest to lowest level of opioid used in the 90 days preceding the first fentanyl patch prescription (highest = single-entity LA opioid; lowest = codeine/acetaminophen combination).

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Safety of fentanyl initiation at the start and end of the study period, by sex and age

    Characteristic% (no.) of patients with unsafe fentanyl initiation*
    2001
    n = 866
    2012
    n = 574
    Overall
    n = 11 063
    Sex
    Female87.4 (501/573)53.1 (178/335)76.3 (5 253/6 884)
    Male86.0 (252/293)45.6 (109/239)70.4 (2 943/4 179)
    Age group, yr
    ≤ 6479.0 (233/295)45.9 (119/259)66.1 (3 100/4 692)
    65–7486.3 (126/146)41.7 (48/115)72.7 (1 377/1 894)
    75–8489.4 (210/235)52.3 (58/111)81.6 (2 039/2 500)
    ≥ 8596.8 (184/190)69.7 (62/89)85.0 (1 680/1 977)
    All87.0 (753/866)50.0 (287/574)74.1 (8 196/11 063)
    • ↵* Unsafe = fentanyl patch newly prescribed to patient without adequate prior exposure to opioids.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Distribution of patients according to initial fentanyl dose and prior opioid exposure

    Prior opioid exposure, mg/d of oral morphine equivalentInitial fentanyl patch dose, μg/h; no. (%) of patients*
    12
    n = 1293
    25
    n = 7739
    50
    n = 1459
    75
    n = 363
    100
    n = 209
    Total
    n = 11 063
    No exposure301 (10.4)2276 (78.3)248 (8.5)51 (1.8)31 (1.1)2907
    1–29429 (13.9)2287 (73.9)315 (10.2)47 (1.5)16 (0.5)3094
    30–59308 (15.7)1382 (70.4)223 (11.4)38 (1.9)13 (0.7)1964
    60–179215 (10.3)1412 (67.6)358 (17.1)77 (3.7)27 (1.3)2089
    180–26918 (4.4)191 (46.7)134 (32.8)43 (10.5)23 (5.6)409
    270–3599 (4.8)71 (37.8)57 (30.3)40 (21.3)11 (5.9)188
    ≥ 36013 (3.2)120 (29.1)124 (30.1)67 (16.3)88 (21.4)412
    • ↵* Percentages are based on row totals. Values in blue screened cells represent inadequate prior opioid exposure.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 9
14 Jun 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Safety of fentanyl initiation according to past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Safety of fentanyl initiation according to past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches
Kevin J. Friesen, Cornelius Woelk, Shawn Bugden
CMAJ Jun 2016, 188 (9) 648-653; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150961

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Safety of fentanyl initiation according to past opioid exposure among patients newly prescribed fentanyl patches
Kevin J. Friesen, Cornelius Woelk, Shawn Bugden
CMAJ Jun 2016, 188 (9) 648-653; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150961
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Acknowledgement
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • National opioid crisis
  • Consequences of unsafe prescribing of transdermal fentanyl
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • National opioid crisis
  • Ontario plans to stop funding high dose opioids
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Booster vaccination with inactivated whole-virus or mRNA vaccines and COVID-19–related deaths among people with multimorbidity: a cohort study
  • Association between virtual primary care and emergency department use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada
  • Survival and health care costs after inpatient elective surgery: comparison of patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Drugs: adverse reactions
    • Pain
    • Patient safety & quality improvement
    • Pharmacology & toxicology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire