Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

False images top form of scientific misconduct

Miriam Shuchman
CMAJ June 14, 2016 188 (9) 645; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5241
Miriam Shuchman
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Famous cases of research fraud typically involve fabricated or falsified data, but the most common form of laboratory misconduct today involves scientists publishing microscopic images that don’t match original data — so-called image manipulation. The practice likely accounts for more than 70% of cases handled by the United States Office of Research Integrity (ORI), according to Susan Garfinkel, director of the office’s Division of Investigative Oversight.

It’s the science equivalent of a news service altering a photograph to make it more convincing, says Dr. Steve Shafer, a professor of anesthesiology at Stanford University and editor of an anesthesiology journal. Manipulated images do not necessarily affect a study’s findings but they are considered a form of misconduct.

In addition to institutionally imposed sanctions, researchers who manipulate images may endure a hit to their reputations. A retraction with a finding of misconduct “basically could end one’s research career from the perspective of not being able to publish further,” says Dr. Donald Miller, a former journal editor and an anesthesiologist at The Ottawa Hospital.

Yet scientists are sometimes unaware that changing an image is wrong. “Many laboratories consider photographs as illustrations that can be manipulated, and not as original data,” one journal editor wrote to the Committee on Publication Ethics. Shafer concurs: “It’s virtually never the investigator trying to get away with something. Almost always, they didn’t know the rules, or a senior person didn’t know the rules.”

Though neither Canada nor the United States have exact numbers, image issues have increased in recent years. Many allegations of image manipulation handled by the ORI don’t lead to findings, however, because the agency cannot prove the changes were intentional. (The ORI has a website explaining appropriate scientific image processing.)

In Canada, misconduct is defined more broadly, and investigators need not prove that a scientist changed an image on purpose, only that he or she breached accepted standards.

“It’s important to point out that an honest kind of breach repeated over time can have just as damaging an impact on the public record and on research,” says Susan Zimmerman, director of the federal Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research. The secretariat does not conduct investigations; that’s up to universities and research institutes.

Figure

Scientists are often unaware that manipulating an image in a research paper may lead to a correction or a retraction.

Image courtesy of IS_ImageSource/iStock

Several Canadian researchers have recently had to correct or retract papers due to manipulated images.

Image problems in papers by a research team at Toronto’s University Health Network (UHN) were the subject of an investigation reviewed in a recent court decision in Ontario. Dr. Sylvia Asa, a cancer researcher, and endocrinologist Dr. Shereen Ezzat, retracted three papers, and editors published a notice of concern about a fourth. UHN spokesperson Gillian Howard says that in the past six years, there have been two other instances involving UHN scientists “in which images were questioned and appropriate sanctions were taken.”

At McGill University in Montréal, an investigation found falsified figures in two papers by Dr. Maya Saleh, which led to corrections. University of Ottawa stem cell researcher Dr. Michael Rudnicki and coauthors retracted an article due to images that represented erroneous data. Dr. Cory Toth, former research director of the Calgary Chronic Pain Centre, retracted nine articles due to images containing manipulated data. And at the Université de Montréal, Zhiguo Wang had to retract six papers due to falsified images.

Penalties for publishing faulty images vary but can be severe. McGill provided no details on disciplinary action. The University of Ottawa made no finding of misconduct against Rudnicki and “judged … that there was no need for sanctions,” according to Catherine Paquet of the university’s Office of Research Ethics and Integrity. Rudnicki leads a stem cell research program, holds a Canada Research Chair and was awarded the Order of Canada after retracting his paper.

But Toth resigned from his post and left Calgary; Wang lost his job in Montréal; and Asa and Ezzat are suspended from doing research at Toronto’s UHN and both stepped down from leadership positions.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 9
14 Jun 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
False images top form of scientific misconduct
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
False images top form of scientific misconduct
Miriam Shuchman
CMAJ Jun 2016, 188 (9) 645; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5241

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
False images top form of scientific misconduct
Miriam Shuchman
CMAJ Jun 2016, 188 (9) 645; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5241
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Journalology & publication ethics
    • Research methods & statistics
    • Women's health (including abortion)

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire