Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Why Canada needs CMAJ

Diane Kelsall, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Kirsten Patrick, Ken Flegel, Erin Russell and Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ June 14, 2016 188 (9) 637; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160539
Diane Kelsall
Editor-in-Chief (interim) (Kelsall), Deputy Editor (Stanbrook, Patrick), Senior Editor (Flegel), Assistant Editor (Russell), News and Humanities Editor (Sibbald),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Stanbrook
Editor-in-Chief (interim) (Kelsall), Deputy Editor (Stanbrook, Patrick), Senior Editor (Flegel), Assistant Editor (Russell), News and Humanities Editor (Sibbald),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten Patrick
Editor-in-Chief (interim) (Kelsall), Deputy Editor (Stanbrook, Patrick), Senior Editor (Flegel), Assistant Editor (Russell), News and Humanities Editor (Sibbald),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Flegel
Editor-in-Chief (interim) (Kelsall), Deputy Editor (Stanbrook, Patrick), Senior Editor (Flegel), Assistant Editor (Russell), News and Humanities Editor (Sibbald),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Russell
Editor-in-Chief (interim) (Kelsall), Deputy Editor (Stanbrook, Patrick), Senior Editor (Flegel), Assistant Editor (Russell), News and Humanities Editor (Sibbald),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Sibbald
Editor-in-Chief (interim) (Kelsall), Deputy Editor (Stanbrook, Patrick), Senior Editor (Flegel), Assistant Editor (Russell), News and Humanities Editor (Sibbald),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

An editorial in the first issue of the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), in 1911, declared “If Canadian thought upon medicine is to make that impression upon the world … it must be concentrated in one channel. What that channel shall be remains for the thinkers themselves to decide.”1 For the past 105 years, that channel has been CMAJ.

Recent events at the journal, including the disbanding of the Journal Oversight Committee and dismissal of the editor-in-chief,2 have prompted some to speculate whether there is a future for national medical journals such as CMAJ.3 Others have wondered whether journals — national or otherwise — are approaching their final act. Too slow, too expensive, too limited, too static — these are some of the criticisms.4 Is there a place for CMAJ in Canada and beyond?

CMAJ has been publishing continuously for more than a century. A mere handful of journals can claim such longevity, and most, like CMAJ, remain influential and respected publications. CMAJ’s authority derives not from its current page counts, Web hits or impact factor, but from its place in medical history. It has told the medical story through a century that future generations will likely remember as the zenith of medical science, from the second industrial revolution into the information age, through epidemics, wars and natural disasters. No new journal, however well-financed, can ever purchase or replicate such a history; it can be earned only through equally long years of ethical, professional publishing.

The journal’s years of contributing to medical science should not be dismissed casually, trivialized or ignored. CMAJ’s influence today is rooted in this legacy, and it extends well beyond Canada’s borders.

CMAJ has never been intended solely for Canadians, but it is and always has been Canadian medicine’s most visible platform on the world stage. Although Canadians have done well earning their place on the world’s other great platforms of medical science, CMAJ is the one that belongs to us, to Canadians. The opportunities CMAJ confers on the outstanding scientists and clinicians who submit their work to the journal today are the same opportunities it conferred in the past to Canadians who changed the course of medicine, including Drs. William Osler, Frederick Banting and Fraser Mustard.

But CMAJ is not frozen in a distant past. The journal has evolved in response to a changing world. In its early days, the content reflected the issues of the time, such as syphilis, goitre and high infant mortality. Over the years, the journal’s voice has contributed to the public discourse on medicare, cigarette packaging, asbestos, Clostridium difficile and other public health and policy problems. Today, CMAJ addresses contemporary concerns such as physician-assisted death, solitary confinement and refugee health.

Similarly, editorial and production processes have evolved in response to advances in technology and changes in stakeholder expectations. CMAJ is available in several formats and is supplemented by podcasts, blogs, videos and a robust social media presence. To offer more opportunities for Canadian and international clinicians and scientists to share their work, CMAJ launched CMAJ Open, an open-access research journal.

As we adapt further to an increasingly digital world — a world characterized by real-time conversation and real-time access to knowledge — the journal will continue to change. The future CMAJ will likely look and function differently from today’s journal.

What will endure, however, is the commitment of CMAJ’s editors to offer the journal to Canada and the world as “a medium for the expression of all that is best in Canadian medicine. For practitioners of general medicine, or in any special department of it; for workers in the laboratory or the hospital, a vehicle is offered, which goes wide afield, for the conveyance of fresh information, free comment, and sound opinion.”1

Canada, CMAJ is your medical journal. If you value the journal as we do and have thoughts about how it can best continue its mission well into its second century, now is the time to share them with us (editor{at}cmaj.ca).

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml.

References

  1. ↵
    Official notice. Can Med Assoc J 1911;1:57–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kelsall D,
    2. Patrick K,
    3. Stanbrook MB,
    4. et al
    . Upholding the integrity of your CMAJ. CMAJ 2016;188:E113–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Richard Smith: The death throes of national medical journals [blog]. BMJ 2016 Mar. 2. Available: http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2016/03/02/richard-smith-the-death-throes-of-national-medical-journals/ (accessed 2016 May 10).
  4. ↵
    1. Krumholz HM
    . The end of journals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015; 8:533–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 9
14 Jun 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why Canada needs CMAJ
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Why Canada needs CMAJ
Diane Kelsall, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Kirsten Patrick, Ken Flegel, Erin Russell, Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Jun 2016, 188 (9) 637; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160539

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Why Canada needs CMAJ
Diane Kelsall, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Kirsten Patrick, Ken Flegel, Erin Russell, Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Jun 2016, 188 (9) 637; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160539
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • CMAJ and antiracism
  • Trouver, tester, « tracer » et isoler énergiquement pour battre la COVID-19
  • Intégration des essais randomisés dans les soins cliniques : comment le Canada peut faire mieux
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Journalology & publication ethics
    • History of medicine
    • CMAJ editorial policy

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire