Analysis
Routinely collected data and comparative effectiveness evidence: promises and limitations
Lars G. Hemkens, Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis and John P.A. Ioannidis
CMAJ May 17, 2016 188 (8) E158-E164; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150653
Lars G. Hemkens
Stanford Prevention Research Center (Hemkens, Ioannidis), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.; Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Hemkens), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics (Contopoulos-Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Medicine; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) (Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Ioannidis); Department of Health Research and Policy (Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Medicine; Department of Statistics (Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, Calif.
MD MPHDespina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis
Stanford Prevention Research Center (Hemkens, Ioannidis), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.; Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Hemkens), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics (Contopoulos-Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Medicine; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) (Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Ioannidis); Department of Health Research and Policy (Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Medicine; Department of Statistics (Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, Calif.
MDJohn P.A. Ioannidis
Stanford Prevention Research Center (Hemkens, Ioannidis), Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.; Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Hemkens), University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics (Contopoulos-Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Medicine; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS) (Contopoulos-Ioannidis, Ioannidis); Department of Health Research and Policy (Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Medicine; Department of Statistics (Ioannidis), Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, Calif.
MD DSc
Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No Responses have been published for this article.
In this issue
Article tools
Routinely collected data and comparative effectiveness evidence: promises and limitations
Lars G. Hemkens, Despina G. Contopoulos-Ioannidis, John P.A. Ioannidis
CMAJ May 2016, 188 (8) E158-E164; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150653
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- JBI systematic review protocol of text/opinions on how to best collect race-based data in healthcare contexts
- Age, sex, and socioeconomic differences in multimorbidity measured in four ways: UK primary care cross-sectional analysis
- Development of prediction models for complications after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals
- Quantifying spatial heterogeneity of malaria in the endemic Papua region of Indonesia: analysis of epidemiological surveillance data
- Evidence-based medicine and machine learning: a partnership with a common purpose
- Treatment effects in randomised trials using routinely collected data for outcome assessment versus traditional trials: meta-research study
- Barriers and facilitators to data quality of electronic health records used for clinical research in China: a qualitative study
- Using electronic health records for clinical trials: Where do we stand and where can we go?
- Innovation to build learning health systems
- Perspective: Improving Nutritional Guidelines for Sustainable Health Policies: Current Status and Perspectives
- Defining asthma and assessing asthma outcomes using electronic health record data: a systematic scoping review
- Authors reply to Perol and colleagues