Article Figures & Tables
Tables
- Table 1:
Association between primary care physician supply and optimal monitoring* (n = 610 441) and hospital visits for diabetes complications† (n = 712 681), by urban and nonurban networks
Urban Nonurban Outcome/model RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) Optimal monitoring*‡ High 1.06 (1.04–1.07) 1.17 (1.14–1.21) Low (reference) 1.00 1.00 ≥ 1 emergency department visit‡ High 1.05 (0.94–1.17) 0.96 (0.85–1.08) Low (reference) 1.00 1.00 One or more hospital admissions‡ High 1.01 (0.89–1.14) 0.91 (0.77–1.07) Low (reference) 1.00 1.00 Note: CI = confidence Interval, RR = relative risk.
↵* Defined as 1 retinal eye exam, 1 cholesterol test and 4 glycated hemoglobin tests during the 2-year study period.
↵† Visits for hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia, skin or soft-tissue infection, or cardiovascular events.
↵‡ Adjusted for patient characteristics: age, sex, income quintile, recent immigration, diabetes duration, mental health diagnosis, comorbidity and morbidity.
- Table 2:
Performance of the senior residents in assessing glass slides and digital whole-slide scanned images of slides
Slides assessed Estimated marginal mean (95% CI) p value Group A slides* 7.06/12 (6.49–7.63) 0.001 Group B slides* 9.08/12 (8.51–9.65) Glass slides 8.23/12 (7.72–8.87) 0.3 Digital slides 7.84/12 (7.28–8.41) Note: CI = confidence interval.
↵* Two different sets of examination slides (glass and digital).
In this issue
Article tools
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
