Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Current laws could guide assisted death

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ February 16, 2016 188 (3) E51-E52; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5222
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Canada doesn’t have to reinvent the wheel when it comes to regulating physician-assisted death, say some legal and ethics experts.

Lawmakers could provide clarity on thorny issues, including whether children should be eligible, but in most cases the service could be provided under the same rules that already govern other end-of-life decisions.

“It’s not as though we’ll be left in limbo,” says Arthur Schafer, founding director of the Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics at the University of Manitoba. “For at least four decades, doctors have withheld or withdrawn life support at their patients’ request ... and I’m not sure that’s so dramatically different.”

Meanwhile, “there’s a very strong reason to discourage delay and a real cost in terms of human suffering,” he says.

On Jan. 11, the federal government asked Canada’s top court for an extra six months to draft regulations for assisted death, which the court ruled last year should be legal for adults who experience enduring, intolerable suffering from a grievous, irremediable condition. The Supreme Court already suspended its 2015 ruling for 12 months to give governments time to amend laws. That means its decision is slated to take effect on Feb. 6, 2016, unless the extension is granted.

In the Jan. 11 hearing, federal lawyer Robert Frater argued that even with an extension it’s possible that “one or more” jurisdictions won’t be ready when the Criminal Code ban is lifted. “We’re talking about the line between killing and not killing, and Parliament has difficult choices.” Counsel for Ontario supported the call for more time, arguing that the provinces carry an “extra burden” in the absence of federal legislation.

But because lawmakers can only expand on the court’s decision, counsel for the appellants, Joseph Arvay, said it’s not critical to have new laws on the books. “The government seems to think the task ahead is far more complicated than it really is.”

Figure1

Patients suffering from irremediable illnesses may have to wait six more months before laws are enacted to allow physician-assisted dying.

Image courtesy of nano/iStock

According to the chair of a provincial–territorial advisory group on physician-assisted death, it’s “unrealistic” to require a perfect system in order to offer the service. “We’re still going to need to learn through its implementation,” says Jennifer Gibson, who is also director of the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics.

Regulatory colleges and professional associations have already issued a “great deal” of advice that could guide physicians in absence of provincial standards for assisted death, Gibson adds. “It’s been remarkable how quickly they mobilized.”

According to David Solomon, a Toronto lawyer who specializes in health industry governance and regulation, provinces are likely to defer to these guidelines anyway, at least “in terms of expectations at the individual physician level.”

Following existing consent and capacity laws will help protect doctors from criminal liability, he adds. This involves “communicating all the risks associated with physician-assisted death, including the possibility that it won’t work and the possibility of a painful death, and ensuring that the minimum criteria in Carter v. Canada is met.”

Thorough documentation will also provide a “strong defense to any claims of negligent or wrongful death,” as well as claims of discrimination when a doctor refuses to provide the service, Solomon says.

Federal and provincial–territorial guidance is most needed where nonbinding advice conflicts, he notes. “Conscientious objection remains the area where there’s the biggest lack of consensus.”

Professional regulators and associations, including the Canadian Medical Association and College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, disagree over whether objecting physicians should be compelled to provide referrals for physician-assisted death. There’s also conflicting advice on whether publicly funded, faith-based institutions should be required to provide the service.

However, “the issue has been hotly debated before on topics such as therapeutic abortion and the duty of a physician to provide a referral for consultation appears to be settled at the regulatory level in Ontario,” says Solomon. “I think we can anticipate that similar principles would be applied by the courts.”

Another contentious issue is whether governments should impose age restrictions on medical aid in dying. Some provinces, such as Ontario, have mature minor laws that allow people under 18 to make their own medical decisions, which could include requesting assistance to die, says Solomon.

“The test for consent should be the same whether it’s for physician-assisted death or any other medical treatment,” he explains. However, governments may choose to impose additional restrictions.

Amendments to the Criminal Code may also be necessary to protect health workers who assist doctors to provide medical aid in dying. “On a strict reading of Carter, it only shields physicians,” says Solomon. It’s unlikely that a police force or court would pursue criminal charges in such cases, “but at the same time it would be helpful for allied health professionals to have more explicit comfort,” he says.

The Supreme Court has deferred judgment on whether to delay the legalization of assisted death.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 3
16 Feb 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Current laws could guide assisted death
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Current laws could guide assisted death
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Feb 2016, 188 (3) E51-E52; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5222

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Current laws could guide assisted death
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Feb 2016, 188 (3) E51-E52; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5222
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What’s important to know about the new COVID-19 variants?
  • Women experts underrepresented in pandemic coverage
  • Canada will have three-digit suicide prevention hotline by 2023
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • End-of-life care & decisions
    • Canadian government

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire