Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

NHS England aims to increase transparency

Roger Collier
CMAJ December 06, 2016 188 (17-18) E428; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5341
Roger Collier
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The National Health Service (NHS) in England is consulting the public on proposals to increase transparency and better manage conflicts of interest. One proposal in particular, requiring NHS consultants (senior physicians) to disclose earnings from the private sector, has raised concerns among some physicians and medical societies.

In its announcement of the launch of the public consultation, which ends Oct. 31, the NHS stated that the proposals will help it become “a world leader on managing conflicts of interest.” The list of proposals include having NHS consultants disclose gifts from patients worth more than £50 ($81), decline gifts from suppliers worth more than £6 ($9) and indicate if their gross earnings from private practice in the previous year was less than £50 000 ($81 000), less than £100 000 ($162 000) or more than £100 000.

Sir Malcolm Grant, chairman of NHS England, has stated that the proposals aren’t intended to restrict NHS physicians from working in the private sector, but rather to shed light on work that largely goes “under the radar.” In blog posts, Grant suggested that managing conflicts of interest in health care is complex but is “fundamentally a question of good judgment supported by due process.” He also acknowledged that the NHS benefits from the experience and expertise gained by physicians in their outside work.

When contacted to comment on the transparency proposals, the British Medical Association (BMA) directed CMAJ to a statement by Dr. Keith Brent, its consultant committee chair. According to Brent, NHS consultants are “dedicated professionals” who do private work during evenings and weekends as to not interfere with their NHS duties. He also noted that senior NHS staff are already required to disclose substantial conflicts of interest annually.

The Royal College of Surgeons of England also directed CMAJ to a prepared statement on the NHS proposals. The college supports transparency, but finds it “difficult to understand what would be gained from publishing private practice income.” The NHS is running the risk of making its physicians feel they can’t be trusted, according to the statement.

Figure

About half of NHS senior physicians also work in the private sector.

Image courtesy of George Clerk/iStock

About half of the 46 000 NHS consultants also work in the private sector, supplementing their average NHS earnings of £112 000 ($181 000) a year. Critics of these physicians worry that senior doctors are shifting their NHS work onto junior doctors and steering patients on waiting lists toward private medicine.

Many physicians disagree that private work affects the NHS, some taking to Twitter to voice their displeasure, suggesting that private work is nothing to be ashamed of, that the doctors who work hardest in the private sector also work the hardest for the NHS, and that the transparency proposals will only push physicians out of the NHS.

It is no surprise that some doctors think it’s unnecessary to shed more light on their outside activities, according to Dr. Joel Lexchin, professor emeritus of health policy and management at York University. “Doctors consistently deny that they individually are affected by outside interests but they are not so sure about their colleagues and feel that other doctors may be influenced. This is an example of what’s known as cognitive dissonance — a way of justifying your actions,” Lexchin said in an email. “As far as doctors splitting their work between the private and public sectors, the potential downside of this is that patients who cannot afford private insurance wait longer because there are fewer people working in the public sector.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (17-18)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 17-18
6 Dec 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
NHS England aims to increase transparency
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
NHS England aims to increase transparency
Roger Collier
CMAJ Dec 2016, 188 (17-18) E428; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5341

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
NHS England aims to increase transparency
Roger Collier
CMAJ Dec 2016, 188 (17-18) E428; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5341
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health policy
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire