Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Predicting individual lung-function trajectories: An opportunity for prevention?

Milo A. Puhan
CMAJ October 04, 2016 188 (14) 997-998; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160611
Milo A. Puhan
Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: miloalan.puhan@uzh.ch
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Zafari and colleagues, in a linked paper, report on their model to predict lung-function trajectories in individual patients.1 The model, which explains much of the variation in lung-function changes over time and performed well in validation cohorts, contributes knowledge beyond the findings of some recent cohort studies about the nature of lung-function changes over time. The prediction model may be useful for prevention and early treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

In 1977, Fletcher and Peto reported on three findings in their famous article on lung-function changes over time based on a cohort of 792 men.2 They found substantial variability in the rate of change in lung function among smokers, former smokers and nonsmokers. Second, they reported that those with below-average lung function at study enrolment were more susceptible to developing COPD, whereas a substantial proportion of men with normal or above-average lung function did not develop obstructive lung disease despite continued smoking. Finally, they described smokers with respiratory symptoms but preserved lung function. It is unfortunate that, from Fletcher and Peto’s article, it is mostly the simplified Figure 1, which emphasized a rather uniform accelerated decline of lung function in smokers, that became famous rather than the important findings described above.

Recent findings on lung-function trajectories as well as on symptoms and exacerbations associated with different levels of airway obstruction were similar to those of Fletcher and Peto despite many changes in environmental and behavioural exposures, as well as treatments.3–5 The prediction model by Zafari and colleagues1 goes beyond these findings because the authors found a smart way to combine predictors of the lung-function trajectory in individuals.

The development and validation of the prediction model was based on large cohort studies with diverse populations, which is ideal to develop widely applicable and robust prediction models.6 The predictive performance of the model is impressive, and the online tool provides four options (depending on the availability of predictors) to predict the forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) trajectory together with an interpretation (e.g., rapid disease progression) and the probabilities of having a specific grade of severity as measured by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) at each year over a follow-up period of 11 years. Thus three key features of prediction models to be used in practice are present — availability of predictors in real-world practice settings, robust evidence on external validity and an easy-to-use tool to obtain the prediction for an individual.

How can the model be used? The authors propose use of the model for both research and clinical practice. Prediction models can indeed be used to make clinical trials or observational studies more efficient and to identify subgroups of particular interest to study, for example, people with a predicted rapid decline in lung function in whom specific interventions may be beneficial to slow down the decline.

Zafari and colleagues argue that the prediction model for FEV1 provides opportunities for individualizing COPD prevention and management, for example, through risk-stratified treatment. Risk-stratified treatment as a means of individualizing respiratory medicine has been proposed before.7 Risk-stratified approaches are attractive if a treatment is indicated only when the risk of the outcome to be prevented is higher than a certain threshold, because the treatment comes with harms or cost. Examples include low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and statins for primary cardiovascular prevention, and, in COPD, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors. These drugs have preventive effects (e.g., prevention of myocardial infarction by ASA and statins, and prevention of exacerbations of COPD by phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, respectively) but come with potential adverse effects, which means that the benefits exceed the harms only in individuals at higher risk.8,9 Without valid prediction models, risk-stratified prevention or treatment is difficult to pursue; without them it is impossible to categorize patients accurately as being below or above a certain treatment threshold.

It seems uncertain whether the prediction model for FEV1 trajectories will be useful for risk-stratified prevention or treatment of COPD. Advice and interventions for smoking cessation should be offered to any smokers irrespective of their risk of rapid decline in FEV1 and do not come with harms, so a risk-stratified approach may not be warranted. And for patients with diagnosed COPD, the clinical manifestations, including comorbidities and the risk for exacerbations and mortality, usually drive treatment decisions more than lung-function trajectories. The authors refer to a lack of prediction models for use in COPD and suggest that prediction models for exacerbations and mortality may now be developed following the example of their FEV1 prediction model. These statements are a bit surprising given that prediction models for patient-important outcomes, such as mortality and exacerbations, have been developed and widely discussed, and some have been validated in thousands of COPD patients.6,10

Instead, the prediction model by Zafari and colleagues provides new opportunities to identify individuals who are likely to progress to COPD or who are likely to have a rapid decline in lung function. The long-term perspective of the lung-function prediction model may motivate smokers to quit and thus may become an important component of individualizing smoking-cessation interventions and lead to higher quit rates. Another opportunity the prediction model offers is to explore whether the effects of some treatments differ in patients with a rapid decline versus patients with a slower decline as predicted by the model. If some treatments prove to be effective to slow down the decline in lung function in individuals at risk for rapid decline, the prediction model may be attractive to identify these individuals for early treatment.

Key points
  • A new prediction model explains much of the variability of individual lung-function trajectories; an online tool facilitates application of the model and offers different versions depending on the availability of predictors.

  • This prediction tool can help individuals and health practitioners to identify the risk for a rapid decline in lung function and to motivate smoking cessation.

  • Prediction tools may be useful in the prevention and early treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Footnotes

  • See also www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.151483

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article was solicited and has not been peer reviewed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Zafari Z,
    2. Sin DD,
    3. Postma DS,
    4. et al
    . Individualized prediction of lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. CMAJ 2016 Aug. 2 [Epub ahead of print].
  2. ↵
    1. Fletcher C,
    2. Peto R
    . The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. BMJ 1977;1:1645–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Vestbo J,
    2. Edwards LD,
    3. Scanlon PD,
    4. et al
    . Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1184–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lange P,
    2. Celli B,
    3. Agustí A,
    4. et al
    . Lung-function trajectories leading to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2015;373:111–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Woodruff PG,
    2. Barr RG,
    3. Bleecker E,
    4. et al
    . Clinical significance of symptoms in smokers with preserved pulmonary function. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1811–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Puhan MA,
    2. Hansel NN,
    3. Sobradillo P,
    4. et al
    . Large-scale international validation of the ADO index in subjects with COPD: an individual subject data analysis of 10 cohorts. BMJ Open 2012;2:pii:e002152.
  6. ↵
    1. Agustí A,
    2. Antó JM,
    3. Auffray C,
    4. et al
    . Personalized respiratory medicine: exploring the horizon, addressing the issues. Summary of a BRN-AJRCCM workshop held in Barcelona on June 12, 2014. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:391–401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Yu T,
    2. Fain K,
    3. Boyd CM,
    4. et al
    . Benefits and harms of roflumilast in moderate to severe COPD. Thorax 2014;69:616–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Yu T,
    2. Vollenweider D,
    3. Varadhan R,
    4. Puhan Ma,
    5. et al
    . Support of personalized medicine through risk-stratified treatment recommendations — an environmental scan of clinical practice guidelines. BMC Med 2013;11:7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Marin JM,
    2. Alfageme I,
    3. Almagro P,
    4. et al
    . Multicomponent indices to predict survival in COPD: the COCOMICS study. Eur Respir J 2013;42:323–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (14)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 14
4 Oct 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predicting individual lung-function trajectories: An opportunity for prevention?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Predicting individual lung-function trajectories: An opportunity for prevention?
Milo A. Puhan
CMAJ Oct 2016, 188 (14) 997-998; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160611

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Predicting individual lung-function trajectories: An opportunity for prevention?
Milo A. Puhan
CMAJ Oct 2016, 188 (14) 997-998; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160611
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ensuring timely genetic diagnosis in adults
  • The case for improving the detection and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea following stroke
  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • Tobacco control & smoking

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire