Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Doing the right thing for our patients with disabilities

Diane Kelsall
CMAJ October 04, 2016 188 (14) 993; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.161001
Diane Kelsall
Editor-in-Chief (interim),
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Many Canadians are limited in their daily activities because of a disability — whether temporarily from illness or permanently1 — and are more likely to require medical care. So it seems logical that doctors’ offices, of all places, would be set up to be barrier-free, to be easily accessible for these patients. Yet the reverse appears to be true at times. There are few regulations around accessibility that apply to doctors’ offices. As a result, patients may face major challenges when visiting their physicians, which in turn can lead to poorer health outcomes.

In 2012, about one in seven adults in Canada reported having a disability.1 With our aging population, this number is expected to rise substantially over time. About 26% of those aged 65–74 years are limited in their activities, and this proportion increases to 43% among those 75 years or older.1

Most adult Canadians with disabilities are affected by pain or difficulties with mobility or flexibility — or a combination of the three.1 These factors can affect a patient’s ability to climb stairs or onto an examining table, use a washroom to provide a sample or navigate halls in a wheelchair. A substantial distance from public transit or from the parking lot to the clinic can present a major challenge.

Although many doctors think their practices are accessible, their patients with disabilities may think otherwise.2 A study in Ontario showed that only 15% of practices had an accessible examination room with an adjustable bed.3

Barriers in accessing health care can have negative effects on health. This is particularly concerning because people with disabilities, as a group, have more chronic diseases and conditions.4 They may experience reduced independence and a loss of confidentiality because of the need to rely on others to access medical care. Some may have to make multiple visits to have their needs addressed, while others may give up entirely and avoid seeking health care.2 People with disabilities have about three times as many unmet health care needs as those without.2 It is no wonder that some develop a distrust of the health care system.

So why then aren’t all doctors’ offices accessible? Retrofitting older medical offices can be expensive, and achieving a barrier-free environment may be difficult given the existing physical space or leaseholder agreements.5 Historically, doctors’ offices have been classified as part of the private sector and have not been subject to the requirements applied to the public sector.2 Medical regulatory bodies encourage physicians to make their offices accessible, but in general have stopped short of requiring a barrier-free environment.

This situation may soon change, however. Recently, several provincial governments have announced an increased commitment to improving accessibility to health care. The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and the Accessibility Directorate of Ontario, for example, have launched a consultation process that will inform the creation of a potential new accessibility standard for health care to be implemented by 2021. The ministry notes that the health care sector serves patients with temporary or permanent disabilities at all times, which sets these facilities apart from other businesses and organizations.6

This consultation will likely force the issue in Ontario (and other jurisdictions may act similarly), but doctors can do some things now to improve health care for patients with disabilities. Barriers to accessing care exist at many levels,2 but improving the physical environment, even with some basic interventions, can have a major impact on accessibility.

Such interventions include a height-adjustable examination table or something as simple as a firm chair with armrests to help those who have difficulty moving from a sitting to a standing position.5 Some patients have had to find a new doctor after developing a disability that prevented them from navigating entrance stairs. Adding a ramp with railings could have solved that problem.5 Doors should be wide enough to accommodate scooters or wheelchairs. Grab bars and emergency call bells in washrooms will make those rooms less treacherous for many.5

We can wait for the ministries of health to tell us to do the right thing for our patients with disabilities — or we can just do it now.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml

References

  1. ↵
    Disability in Canada: initial findings from the Canadian Survey on Disability. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; modified 2015 Nov. 30. Available: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2013002-eng.htm (accessed 2016 Aug. 24).
  2. ↵
    Improving accessibility of Family Health Teams for people with mobility disabilities: examining rooms with adjustable tables and lifts. Kingston (ON): Canadian Disability Policy Alliance; 2013. Available: www.disabilitypolicyalliance.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Family-Health-Teams.pdf (accessed 2016 Aug. 23).
  3. ↵
    1. McColl MA,
    2. Forster D,
    3. Shortt SE,
    4. et al
    . Physician experiences providing primary care to people with disabilities. Healthc Policy 2008;4:e129–47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Krahn GL,
    2. Walker DK,
    3. Correa-De-Araujo R
    . Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. Am J Public Health 2015;105(Suppl 2):S198–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Pritchard S,
    2. Milligan J,
    3. Lee J
    . Making your office accessible for patients with mobility impairments. Can Fam Physician 2014;60:253–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Moran M
    . Second legislative review of the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005. Toronto: Accessibility Directorate of Ontario; 2014. Available: www.ontario.ca/document/legislative-review-accessibility-ontarians-disabilities-act (accessed 2016 Aug. 22).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (14)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 14
4 Oct 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Doing the right thing for our patients with disabilities
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Doing the right thing for our patients with disabilities
Diane Kelsall
CMAJ Oct 2016, 188 (14) 993; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.161001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Doing the right thing for our patients with disabilities
Diane Kelsall
CMAJ Oct 2016, 188 (14) 993; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.161001
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Le sujet de l’heure : l’accès aux soins de santé au Canada
  • Integration of midwifery care in Canada
  • CMAJ’s new guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in research articles
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Movement disorders
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire