Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Private telehealth foray into public system

Paul Webster
CMAJ July 12, 2016 188 (10) E209; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5285
Paul Webster
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The launch of an app offering Ontario patients access to family doctors via telephone, text messaging and videolink for $10 a month is fuelling debate over the place of privately delivered virtual health care.

The Akira app allows Ontario patients to consult with physicians and grant permission to access app-generated health records, including clinical notes, prescriptions and test results, said Dr. Taha Bandukwala, Akira’s chief medical officer. Users can begin a text conversation with a doctor, and doctors can launch a video chat, during office hours six days a week.

During a test this spring, more than 2000 people signed up for Akira and had over 750 doctor consultations, Bandukwala said. “Patients love this. We feel that this will in future be the first touchpoint for primary health care delivery.”

Bandukwala cautions that Akira is not intended for medical emergencies or to replace ongoing care by physicians for chronic disease, cancer or other complex care conditions. But it gives patients access to doctors to diagnose and treat many common health problems, such as anxiety or depression, urinary tract infections, rashes and flu.

Physicians are employed by Akira on contract. Patients must be Canadian residents and provide government identification. Patient identity must be confirmed via video link when physicians write prescriptions. An Ontario Health Insurance Plan number is required if the patient is referred for publicly insured specialist care.

Akira’s novelty should not be overstated, notes Dr. Karim Keshavjee, CEO of Infoclin, a Toronto-based e-health consultancy. “Lots of people have tried this in Ontario in the past. None of them have found enough traction to become a going concern. Doctors don’t have [automatic] access to the patient’s medical record, which limits what they can do and say. Other than the prescription part, this is basically like the 1–800 telehealth line.”

Figure1

Commercial virtual health care is another attempt to privatize health care, says an expert.

Image courtesy of Georgijevic/iStock

Dr. David Chan, professor and director of information technology in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University, is also skeptical. “This is another attempt to introduce privatization of health care,” he said. “This business venture will go away as the majority of citizens in Canada will refuse to pay. [The] public health [system] is not interested because this is new programming and where does the new money come from?”

A variation on virtual health for rural and northern residents is already available: Ontario Telehealth Network (OTN) provided physician access via telephone and videolink in 390 000 health care consultations during 2014, avoiding 260 million kilometres of travel for patients. OTN requires that patients visit health care facilities to access telemedicine technologies and medical services; Akira does not.

CEO Ed Brown describes Akira’s arrival as a sign that “patients increasingly want care to be delivered on their own terms.” He anticipates that in the future half of all health care consultations will be delivered via virtual technologies. “The challenge is to figure out how to deliver it in way that sustains the public health system.”

Whether commercial services such as Akira will ever be covered by public health insurance plans is uncertain, said Brown, who notes that British Columbia’s experience has been problematic.

In the hope of expanding physician access for underserved communities, the BC government implemented physician fee-for-service billing codes. Several companies began offering technology platforms to physicians, which resulted in an eightfold increase in physician billing for telemedicine.

When family physicians complained that telemedicine doctors were running “virtual walk-in clinics, rather than providing more desirable holistic primary care,” said Brown, the BC Ministry of Health suspended the program in 2014 and launched a review, which has yet to conclude.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 188 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 188, Issue 10
12 Jul 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Private telehealth foray into public system
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Private telehealth foray into public system
Paul Webster
CMAJ Jul 2016, 188 (10) E209; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5285

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Private telehealth foray into public system
Paul Webster
CMAJ Jul 2016, 188 (10) E209; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5285
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Medical trainees warn practice permits will drive away doctors
  • Coupons for health care a sign of creeping privatization?
  • Canada’s health system is among the least green
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Shared decision-making (doctor-patient)

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire