Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Transparency of care

Israel Amirav
CMAJ March 03, 2015 187 (4) 278; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1150013
Israel Amirav
Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Patrick1 is to be applauded for her enlightening editorial on electronic medical records (EMRs). She wonders, “is sharing the entirety of the electronic medical record with a patient not the obvious next step in the laudable movement toward shared decision-making and patient–physician collaboration?”1

I could not agree more. Like Patrick, I am a newcomer to Canada. In Israel (where I come from), EMRs have been used for over 15 years with enormous success. Access to EMRs is an integral part of patient rights and is available at the click of a button. Lab results are shared and accessible to patients within minutes of being reported. As Patrick points out, with judicious application of appropriate security measures, like those employed to protect banking, pension, tax and insurance information, there should be more advantages than disadvantages to the open access of medical information.1

I would like to expand on Patrick’s editorial1 and suggest that transparency and sharing also extend to the clinic visit summary letter. I am a consultant pediatrician, and in my practice in Israel, I used the EMR to print two copies of my visit summary notes/letter. These were given to the parent or guardian to take with them, one copy to keep for their records and one for their family physician or pediatrician. I have recently started following this practice in Canada. My patients feel so much more empowered and involved in the clinical decision-making process. They leave the appointment armed with a summary of the visit and are able to review the information immediately or later at their convenience. These patients are now questioning why other health care providers do not offer the same open access to their patients’ medical records.

The benefits for me are that I have no more dictations to complete after clinic, I do not have to wait for a transcriptionist to type my letters, and there is no editing required. The consult letter is delivered directly to the referring physician via the returning patient. As a precaution, I do currently send a copy by mail to the family doctor/pediatrician. However, I suspect that as time goes by, this will become unnecessary.

I believe that patients will increasingly demand such transparency from other clinical encounters as well. It is indeed time to embrace transparency!

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Patrick K
    . Patients and their medical records: It is time to embrace transparency. CMAJ 2014;186: 811.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 4
3 Mar 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transparency of care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Transparency of care
Israel Amirav
CMAJ Mar 2015, 187 (4) 278; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1150013

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Transparency of care
Israel Amirav
CMAJ Mar 2015, 187 (4) 278; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1150013
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Responding to Bill C-7
  • Renalism
  • Benefits of nirmatrelvir–ritonavir remain unproven for some populations
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire