Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Outrage at planned changes to Quebec IVF

Véronique Morin
CMAJ February 03, 2015 187 (2) E61; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4966
Véronique Morin
Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

At the age of 44, Nadia Mahfoufi finally got pregnant after numerous rounds of in-vitro fertilization (IVF). But if Bill 20, tabled by Quebec Health Minister Gaétan Barrette on Nov. 28, had been enacted, Mahfoufi argues she would not be holding her six-month-old baby boy in her arms today.

The provincial government is proposing a drastic cut to funding for IVF treatments, which have been heavily subsidized since 2010. If the bill is approved, the government will cover only one round of IVF treatment and artificial insemination, and only for women between the ages of 18 and 42. The province claims the changes will save nearly $50 million a year.

In effect, these proposed cuts mean Quebec could go from being the most generous jurisdiction in terms of assisted reproduction to being one of the most restrictive. Quebec is now the only province that funds up to three rounds of IVF. Last year, Ontario agreed to fund one round of IVF per woman, but in most provinces, IVF is paid for privately.

The bill is supported by a report from Robert Salois, the province’s Health and Welfare Commissioner, which states that IVF costs exploded from about $16 million a year in 2010 to over $80 million by 2012.

Not surprisingly, Bill 20 has prompted an outcry from some patient groups and physicians.

“Quebec went from being the leader in North America in terms of having the most comprehensive coverage to being really at the back of the line,” says Neal Mahutte, president of the Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. The society is working on a policy document about age limits for fertility treatments.

Bill 20’s stipulation that IVF be carried out only on women between the ages of 18 and 42, is unethical, says Dr. Seang Lin Tan, a reproductive endocrinologist in Montréal. “I understand it is a cost saving rational, but the government has no business in deciding the age of a women’s motherhood.”

Figure

Quebec now funds up to three rounds of IVF, but proposed legislation would reduce that to one.

Kyoshi Takahase Segundo/iStock/Thinkstock

“It is clear that the law in question would have prevented us from realizing our dream,” Mahfoufi says. “Frankly, we would have certainly left Quebec.”

The bill also prohibits those working in the “health and social services sector” from directing women over the age of 42 to another jurisdiction for treatment, or face fines of up to $50 000. Tan, who estimates he could lose more than 30% of his patients if the bill passes, says this edict is “crazy.”

Joanne Beauvais, press attachée to the minister explains that “IVF procedures are considered too risky after the age of 42 and therefore it would be irresponsible for a doctor to recommend it elsewhere as well.”

“This is draconian legislation,” says Mahutte. “Can you imagine what will happen to patients over the age of 42 who already have frozen eggs or embryos in Quebec? It will be illegal for Quebec physicians to use those eggs or embryos and illegal for us to direct the patient for care elsewhere.” If the patient manages to get a physician outside Quebec, “how is she supposed to arrange the transfer of her genetic material?” asks Mahutte. “This requires our assistance, but is apparently illegal and punishable with a $50 000 fine. How does that make any sense?”

Bill 20 is extremely disappointing adds Virginie Kieffer president of the Association des couples infertiles du Quebec, which represents hundreds of couples. “It is an enormous deception for us. We fought so hard to get support for these couples. Infertility is a medical condition. We feel that if the government had better framed the program, the cost would not have skyrocketed this way.” She says the age cap is discriminatory.

However, Françoise Baylis, professor and Canada Research Chair in Bioethics and Philosophy at Dalhousie University in Halifax, disagrees: “There is significant evidence in the literature that advanced maternal age is harmful to both the infant and the mother, in this sense I do not think that the bill infringes on women’s rights.”

Baylis does agree that women have the right to make their own reproductive choices. “In any case, there is nothing in the law that prevents a woman over 42 seeking IVF treatment outside of Quebec. The law only prohibits those who are working ‘in the health and social services sector’ from referring women over 42 to another jurisdiction.”

The new bill is scheduled for debate at the National Assembly of Quebec in the spring of 2015.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 2
3 Feb 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outrage at planned changes to Quebec IVF
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Outrage at planned changes to Quebec IVF
Véronique Morin
CMAJ Feb 2015, 187 (2) E61; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4966

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Outrage at planned changes to Quebec IVF
Véronique Morin
CMAJ Feb 2015, 187 (2) E61; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4966
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The evolving picture of long COVID
  • When are shared decisions false choices?
  • Q&A: As a doctor in a war zone “you have to come to grips with your limitations”
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire