Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

A 24-year-old man with suspected sacroiliitis

Shirley Chow and Nigil Haroon
CMAJ February 03, 2015 187 (2) 124-125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141352
Shirley Chow
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shirley.chow@sunnybrook.ca
Nigil Haroon
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 24-year-old man presents to his primary care physician with a six-month history of low back pain. He has no history of trauma, fever or weight loss, and his pain has not responded to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The patient has joint stiffness for an hour each morning and says that he feels better with movement and worse with rest. On further inquiry, the patient has no other joint pain, eye symptoms, rash or change in bowel habits. There is no known family history of inflammatory arthritis or other autoimmune conditions. The result of a straight leg raising test is negative, and the patient’s reflexes, gait, power and sensation in his extremities are normal. He has normal forward flexion of the back, but with pain.

What is the likely diagnosis?

The most common causes of back pain are lumbar strain, osteoarthritis of the spine and a herniated disc.1 Red flags such as weight loss, fever and neurologic symptoms suggesting medical causes for back pain, such as cancer and infection, should be ruled out.2 However, this patient’s young age, the chronic and inflammatory nature of his back pain (i.e., morning stiffness, symptoms better with movement and worse with rest) suggest the possibility of inflammatory back arthritis or sacroiliitis.

Inflammatory back arthritis, also known as axial spondyloarthritis or ankylosing spondylitis, should be considered in a patient less than 45 years of age with back pain lasting more than three months.3 Inflammatory back pain in axial spondyloarthritis is characterized by insidious onset of back or buttock pain, morning stiffness lasting more than one hour, and pain that improves with activity but worsens with rest. Patients will often describe the pain waking them up at night after a few hours of sleep and relieved by getting up to walk around or stretch. They may have other spondyloarthritis features, including peripheral arthritis of small or large joints, pain that responds to NSAIDs, enthesitis of any tendon, dactylitis or swollen “sausage” digits, psoriasis, uveitis, inflammatory bowel disease, a positive family history (the probability of ankylosing spondylitis developing in children with one affected parent is 10%),4 elevated C-reactive protein and presence of human leukocyte antigen B27 (HLA-B27) (Box 1).3

Box 1:

Features of axial spondyloarthritis from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria3

  • Inflammatory back pain

  • Peripheral arthritis

  • Enthesitis

  • Uveitis

  • Dactylitis

  • Psoriasis

  • Crohn disease or colitis

  • Good response to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

  • Family history of axial spondyloarthritis

  • Positive HLA-B27 test result

  • Elevated C-reactive protein

Note: The handbook on assessing spondyloarthritis is available at www.asas-group.org/education/ASAS-handbook.pdf

Does the patient require imaging?

As per the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations, imaging should not be ordered in cases of low back pain that does not have red flags.5 However, in this patient’s case, the chronic inflammatory nature of the symptoms, their duration of more than three months, and the patient’s young age (< 45 yr) makes axial spondyloarthritis a possible diagnosis. A radiograph of the sacroiliac joints should be ordered. If the images are negative, and if the pretest probability is high, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints with short T1 inversion recovery sequences can be ordered; gadolinium contrast is not required.6,7

Findings consistent with axial spondyloarthritis on imaging include sacroiliitis on radiography or bone marrow edema along the sacroiliac joints on MRI. Lesions consistent with bone marrow edema on MRI are highly suspicious for axial spondyloarthritis.7 With a patient history of inflammatory back pain, laboratory evidence of inflammation (e.g., elevated C-reactive protein) and findings on imaging, the probability of spondyloarthritis increases to 90%.6

Should HLA-B27 testing be ordered at this appointment?

HLA-B27 testing is not useful as a single diagnostic test in a patient with low back pain without further signs or symptoms suggesting spondyloarthritis (Box 1). This is one of the Canadian Rheumatology Association‘s Choosing Wisely recommendations (Box 2).8 A positive result in this setting will not classify the person as having spondyloarthritis. In a patient with chronic low back pain, positive HLA-B27, and no other features of spondylitis, the post-test probability of inflammatory back disease would not exceed 30%.9 Between 5% and 10% of healthy people have positive test results for HLA-B27, varying with ethnicity, and inflammatory back arthritis will develop in only 2%–5% of those with a positive test result.6,7

Box 2:

Choosing Wisely Canada recommendation on HLA-B27 testing8

Do not order an HLA-B27 test unless spondyloarthritis is suspected based on specific signs or symptoms.

  • HLA-B27 testing is not useful as a single diagnostic test in a patient with low back pain without further signs or symptoms of spondyloarthropathy (e.g., inflammatory back pain more than three months in duration with age of onset less than 45 years, peripheral synovitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, psoriasis or uveitis), because the diagnosis of spondyloarthropathy in these patients is of low probability. If HLA-B27 testing is used, at least two signs or symptoms of spondyloarthropathy, or the presence of positive imaging results, need to be present to classify a patient as having axial spondyloarthropathy. There is no clinical use in ordering an HLA-B27 test in the absence of positive imaging or the minimally required signs or symptoms of spondyloarthropathy.

If imaging shows evidence of sacroiliitis in a young patient with chronic inflammatory back pain, there is no additional requirement of HLA-B27 testing for diagnosis. However, if imaging is negative in this situation, the HLA-B27 test can be helpful. For a diagnosis of axial spondylitis in a patient with a positive HLA-B27 test result and negative imaging, criteria from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society state that at least two other spondyloarthritis features must be present (Box 1).3 These criteria have a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 84%.3 About 85% of patients with ankylosing spondylitis have a positive result on HLA-B27 testing.6,7

When would you refer this patient to a rheumatologist?

A patient with inflammatory back pain, sacroiliitis on radiography or a positive HLA-B27 test result should be referred to a rheumatologist for further assessment.6 The rheumatologist can evaluate for features of spondyloarthritis and order further imaging or testing if appropriate.

Case revisited

The physician ordered a C-reactive protein level and radiographs of the sacroiliac joints. The radiology report was equivocal, but the patient had elevated C-reactive protein. The physician ordered MRI of the sacroiliac joints with short T1 inversion recovery sequences, which showed bone marrow edema. Given these results, the physician referred the patient to a rheumatologist for assessment without ordering HLA-B27 testing. With positive imaging and elevated C-reactive protein (a feature of spondyloarthritis), further testing by the primary care physician was not required.

CMAJ is collaborating with Choosing Wisely Canada (www.choosingwiselycanada.org), with support from Health Canada, to publish a series of articles describing how to apply the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations in clinical practice.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Contributors: Both of the authors contributed to the conception, writing and revising of the manuscript, approved the final version submitted for publication and agreed to act as guarantors of the work.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Deyo RA,
    2. Weinstein JN
    . Low back pain. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:363–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria low back pain. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; 2011 [last review date]. Available: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/LowBackPain.pdf (accessed 2014 Dec. 8).
  3. ↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Landewe R,
    4. et al
    . The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:777–83.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Brown MA,
    2. Laval SH,
    3. Brophy S,
    4. et al
    . Recurrence risk modelling of the genetic susceptibility to ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2000;59:883–6
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    CMA’s Forum on General and Family Practice Issues and College of Family Physicians of Canada: eleven things physicians and patients should question. Ottawa: Choosing Wisely Canada/Canadian Medical Association; 2014. Available: www.choosingwiselycanada.org/recommendations/cmas-forum-on-general-and-family-practice-issues-and-college-of-family-physicians-of-canada/ (accessed 2014 Nov.).
  6. ↵
    1. Rudwaleit M,
    2. van der Heijde D,
    3. Khan M,
    4. et al
    . How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:535–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Rostom S,
    2. Dougados M,
    3. Gossec L
    . New tools for diagnosing spondyloarthropathy. Joint Bone Spine 2010;77:108–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Chow SL,
    2. Thorne JC,
    3. Bell MJ,
    4. et al
    . Choosing Wisely: The Canadian Rheumatology Association’s list of 5 things physicians and patients should question. J Rheum. In press.
  9. ↵
    1. Sidiropoulos PI,
    2. Hatemi G,
    3. Song IH,
    4. et al
    . Evidence-based recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: systematic literature search of the 3E Initiative in Rheumatology involving a broad panel of experts and practising rheumatologists. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:355–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 2
3 Feb 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A 24-year-old man with suspected sacroiliitis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A 24-year-old man with suspected sacroiliitis
Shirley Chow, Nigil Haroon
CMAJ Feb 2015, 187 (2) 124-125; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.141352

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A 24-year-old man with suspected sacroiliitis
Shirley Chow, Nigil Haroon
CMAJ Feb 2015, 187 (2) 124-125; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.141352
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • What is the likely diagnosis?
    • Does the patient require imaging?
    • Should HLA-B27 testing be ordered at this appointment?
    • When would you refer this patient to a rheumatologist?
    • Case revisited
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Azathioprine-induced severe anemia potentiated by the concurrent use of allopurinol
  • Schwannoma of the tongue
  • “Superscan” in diffusion-weighted imaging with background body suppression magnetic resonance imaging
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Sections
    • Decisions
    • Choosing Wisely Canada
  • Topics
    • Musculoskeletal medicine
    • Rheumatology
    • Imaging

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire