Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Physician experience and outcomes among patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards

Finlay A. McAlister, Erik Youngson, Jeffrey A. Bakal, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc and Narmin Kassam
CMAJ October 06, 2015 187 (14) 1041-1048; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150316
Finlay A. McAlister
Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Finlay.McAlister@ualberta.ca
Erik Youngson
Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey A. Bakal
Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jayna Holroyd-Leduc
Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Narmin Kassam
Division of General Internal Medicine (McAlister, Kassam); Patient Health Outcomes Research and Clinical Effectiveness Unit (McAlister, Youngson, Bakal), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.; Data Integration Measurement and Reporting (Bakal), Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alta.; Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences (Holroyd-Leduc), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Derivation of the study cohort.

  • Figure 2:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2:

    Patient outcomes across quartiles of physician experience. Referent group for each comparison are patients cared for by the physician quartile with the least experience (quartile 1). Odds ratios less than 1 favour physicians with more experience. Adjusted odds ratios were obtained using logistic generalized linear mixed models, with physician as a random effect and fixed effects being patient age, sex, hospital and LACE score (except death during index admission, which instead used Charlson Comorbidity Index score). CI = confidence interval; LACE = length of stay, acuity of admission, comorbidities and emergency department (ED) visits; OR = odds ratio.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of study participants, by quartile of physician experience

    CharacteristicOverall (149 physicians)Physician experience quartilep value*
    1, 4–10 yr (40 physicians)2, 11–17 yr (38 physicians)3, 18–22 yr (33 physicians)4, ≥ 23 yr (38 physicians)
    No. of patients100462394247127202461
    Age, yr, mean ± SD63.4 ± 19.564.1 ± 19.162.8 ± 19.562.3 ± 19.764.5 ± 19.6< 0.001
    Male sex5153 (51.3)1192 (49.8)1271 (51.4)1428 (52.5)1262 (51.3)0.3
    Top 5 most responsible diagnoses, no. (%)2506 (24.9)648 (27.1)612 (24.8)656 (24.1)590 (24.0)0.045†
     COPD766 (7.6)221 (9.2)187 (7.6)176 (6.5)182 (7.4)
     Pneumonia512 (5.1)135 (5.6)118 (4.8)148 (5.4)111 (4.5)
     Heart failure517 (5.1)120 (5.0)120 (4.9)130 (4.8)147 (6.0)
     Urinary tract infection364 (3.6)104 (4.3)98 (4.0)92 (3.4)70 (2.8)
     Venous thromboembolism347 (3.5)68 (2.8)89 (3.6)110 (4.0)80 (3.3)
    Diagnosis fields populated in Discharge Abstract Database, no. (%)7.4 (4.6)7.7 (4.8)7.7 (4.8)7.0 (4.5)7.4 (4.4)< 0.001
    Charlson Comorbidity Index score, mean ± SD2.6 ± 3.22.7 ± 2.92.7 ± 3.32.6 ± 3.52.6 ± 3.10.4
    Features of index admission, mean ± SD
     Resource intensity weight‡1.4 ± 1.21.4 ± 1.21.3 ± 1.31.4 ± 1.11.4 ± 1.20.5
     LACE score10.4 ± 3.110.6 ± 3.110.2 ± 3.110.4 ± 3.110.6 ± 3.0< 0.001
     Expected length of stay, d7.3 ± 5.27.6 ± 5.87.2 ± 5.37.3 ± 5.07.2 ± 4.60.03
     Actual length of stay, d7.6 ± 6.27.6 ± 6.27.1 ± 6.17.6 ± 6.08.2 ± 6.3< 0.001
    Discharge disposition, no. (%)0.2§
     Death541 (5.4)133 (5.6)135 (5.5)137 (5.0)136 (5.5)
     Transferred to facility with inpatient care241 (2.4)66 (2.8)47 (1.9)60 (2.2)68 (2.8)
     Transferred to long-term care facility700 (7.0)169 (7.1)163 (6.6)190 (7.0)178 (7.2)
     Transferred to hospice32 (0.3)4 (0.2)9 (0.4)8 (0.3)11 (0.4)
     Discharged home with support services1688 (16.8)388 (16.2)419 (17.0)428 (15.7)453 (18.4)
     Discharged home6645 (66.1)1581 (66.0)1655 (67.0)1846 (67.9)1563 (63.5)
     Left against medical advice199 (2.0)53 (2.2)43 (1.7)51 (1.9)52 (2.1)
    • Note: COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, LACE = length of stay, acuity of admission, comorbidities and emegency department visits, SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Calculated using analysis of variance (continuous variables) or χ2 test (binary and categorical variables).

    • ↵† p value comparing overall proportion of discharges (binary) that were a “Top 5 diagnoses” across physician experience groups.

    • ↵‡ Resource intensity weight values provide a measure of a patient’s relative resource consumption compared with an average typical inpatient cost and are generated by the Canadian Institute of Health Information for each case mix group.

    • ↵§ Overall p value for discharge disposition (categorical) across physician experience groups.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Outcomes during the index admission and during the first 30 days postdischarge

    OutcomeOverall, %Physician experience quartile, %*p value
    1, 4–10 yr2, 11–17 yr3, 18–22 yr4, ≥ 23 yr
    Death during index admission, or death or readmission within 30 d postdischarge17.318.816.516.617.40.2
    Death during index admission5.45.65.55.05.50.8
    Death or readmission within 30 d for any cause†‡12.814.211.912.512.90.2
    Readmission within 30 d for any cause‡11.211.911.011.110.90.7
    Death within 30 d postdischarge†‡3.03.62.33.12.90.1
    Emergency department visit within 30 d postdischarge‡16.617.215.616.916.70.5
    Discharged back to same level of care as preadmission‡93.192.894.193.292.50.2
    Outpatient physician visit within 30 d of discharge†72.272.971.172.172.60.6
    No. of outpatient physician visits in the first 30 d postdischarge, mean ± SD‡2.53 ± 1.982.57 ± 2.022.53 ± 2.032.51 ± 1.892.53 ± 1.970.8
    Length of stay, d (95% CI)
     Mean actual7.62 (7.50–7.74)7.62 (7.37–7.87)7.10 (6.86–7.34)7.55 (7.33–7.78)8.22 (7.97–8.47)< 0.001
     Physician-adjusted actual§7.30 (6.64–7.95)7.53 (6.88–8.19)7.53 (6.84–8.22)8.04 (7.37–8.71)0.5
     Patient- and physician-adjusted actual¶7.63 (7.13–8.14)7.71 (7.21–8.22)7.82 (7.30–8.34)7.90 (7.39–8.42)0.9
    • ↵* Unless otherwise stated.

    • ↵† Mortality data postdischarge are not available for patients discharged after Dec. 1, 2011; thus, these patients are excluded from this calculation.

    • ↵‡ Denominator excludes patients who died during index admission to hospital.

    • ↵§ Physician-adjusted length of stay obtained from generalized linear mixed model containing physician experience group (fixed effect) and controlling for physician as a random effect.

    • ↵¶ Patient- and physician-adjusted length of stay obtained from same generalized linear mixed model with physician as a random effect, but also including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, hospital, time period (2011–2012 v. 2009–2010) and hospital × time period interaction.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (14)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 14
6 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Podcast

Subscribe to podcast
Download MP3

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician experience and outcomes among patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physician experience and outcomes among patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards
Finlay A. McAlister, Erik Youngson, Jeffrey A. Bakal, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Narmin Kassam
CMAJ Oct 2015, 187 (14) 1041-1048; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150316

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physician experience and outcomes among patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards
Finlay A. McAlister, Erik Youngson, Jeffrey A. Bakal, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Narmin Kassam
CMAJ Oct 2015, 187 (14) 1041-1048; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150316
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Physician-level variation in clinical outcomes and resource use in inpatient general internal medicine: an observational study
  • Appropriateness of peripherally inserted central catheter use among general medical inpatients: an observational study using routinely collected data
  • Characteristics of short general internal medicine hospital stays: a multicentre cross-sectional study
  • Mortality of hospitalised internal medicine patients bedspaced to non-internal medicine inpatient units: retrospective cohort study
  • Patient characteristics, resource use and outcomes associated with general internal medicine hospital care: the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) retrospective cohort study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Self-reported sleep disturbances among people who have had a stroke: a cross-sectional analysis
  • Risk of interpersonal violence during and after pregnancy among people with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study
  • Perinatal outcomes of midwife-led care, stratified by medical risk: a retrospective cohort study from British Columbia (2008–2018)
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Academic medicine
    • Internal medicine
    • Medical careers
    • Medical education, residency, internship
    • Patient education

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire