Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Austerity and fiscal prudence are health issues

Diane Kelsall and Carsten Hennings
CMAJ October 06, 2015 187 (14) 1029; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.150950
Diane Kelsall
Deputy Editor (Kelsall), ; Chair, Department of Business Administration and Van Norman Chair of Business (Hennings), Tyndale University College, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carsten Hennings
Deputy Editor (Kelsall), ; Chair, Department of Business Administration and Van Norman Chair of Business (Hennings), Tyndale University College, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The world has been transfixed by the latest installment in the Greek financial crisis. This summer, deadlines came and went, offers of debt relief were made and rejected, and a tentative agreement was finally reached between Greece and its creditors. However, the lengthy delay to an agreement came at a sizable cost — and not just a financial one. Greece is required to commit to austerity measures (policies intended to reduce the rapidly growing public sector debt) that are more drastic than may have been necessary earlier. Austerity measures affect all aspects of society, including health care, which can have serious effects on population health. Are we immune to such a scenario in Canada? Unfortunately, we are not.

To put it simply, the Greek financial crisis was a predictable result of a series of economic and political decisions. Although it did implement some austerity measures required for large bailouts in 2010 and 2012, the Greek government most recently failed to make the difficult — and unpopular — political decisions needed to restructure the economy and satisfy its creditors. Even though the economy failed to grow as hoped, the government favoured spending over retrenchment, resulting in spiraling deficits. Postponing the day of reckoning only made things worse — an extra €30 billion was added to the bailout during July 2015 alone. As a result, the Greek people have suffered and will continue to do so for some time.

Budget constraints in times of economic crisis affect government priorities and spending in many areas, and may include disproportionate cuts to health care and a reliance on shifting costs to the consumer.1 Health effects can occur even among those with jobs, but the poor, less educated and unemployed are primarily affected.2

When austerity measures are implemented by governments, sometimes as a requirement by creditors, they may put even more strain on the health care system and, as a consequence, have greater effects on health. Greece, for example, has undergone 40% cuts to hospital budgets, closure of many health care facilities and shortages of staff and medical supplies, while user fees to access care have increased.3 Self-reported health has deteriorated; a rise in HIV infections (owing to reduced preventive services) and worsening mental health (suicides and major depressive disorders), particularly in people facing serious economic hardship, have been seen. Self-reported unmet medical need (the inability to obtain health care when one believes it to be necessary) has risen.3

As with health, prevention is better than attempting to “cure” an economy during a financial meltdown. It is difficult for countries to restructure their economic, health care and other systems during financial crises, although scarcity can clarify values and may resolve conflicts that hinder reform. Worryingly, the Greek financial crisis shows that governments may postpone making the right choices, even when the need for action is clear and delay is likely to worsen the situation.

So, where do Canadians come into this picture? As consumers, we have largely chosen a “buy now, pay later” approach to our finances; we overvalue the present in our decision-making rather than take the effect of debt on our future seriously. Household debt is at a troubling high, with many Canadians neither saving nor paying off loans.

This attitude is mirrored politically, with multiple levels of government running problematic deficits. The governments we have elected have delayed making difficult fiscal decisions that involve serious discussions about priorities and trade-offs — and we have let them do so. Collectively, we have been slow to demand measures to deal with growing public debt; indeed, we may have done the opposite at times. Those pushing for improvements in the health care system should not dismiss the importance of the economy or of fiscal responsibility.

There are multiple ways to be fiscally prudent, but these require difficult choices to be made by our governments around revenue, spending, investment and priorities in program delivery. Delaying these tough decisions, including those affecting the health care system, may be easier for politicians and for the rest of us now. However, postponing these decisions, especially when running problematic deficits, puts our governments at risk of having to make much more drastic choices in the future — at a time when the consequences may be far greater.

We may not be in the kind of trouble countries like Greece find themselves in today, but delays in making the right decisions, individually and collectively, will not serve us any better in the future than it has served them.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: For Diane Kelsall’s competing interests, see www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml. None declared for Carsten Hennings.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cylus J,
    2. Mladovsky P,
    3. McKee M
    . Is there a statistical relationship between economic crises and changes in government health expenditure growth? An analysis of twenty-four European countries. Health Serv Res 2012;47:2204–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Zivin K,
    2. Paczkoski M,
    3. Galea S
    . Economic downturns and population mental health: research findings, gaps, challenges and priorities. Psychol Med 2011;41:1343–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Karanikolos M,
    2. Mladovsky P,
    3. Cylus J,
    4. et al
    . Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe. Lancet 2013;381:1323–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (14)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 14
6 Oct 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Austerity and fiscal prudence are health issues
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Austerity and fiscal prudence are health issues
Diane Kelsall, Carsten Hennings
CMAJ Oct 2015, 187 (14) 1029; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150950

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Austerity and fiscal prudence are health issues
Diane Kelsall, Carsten Hennings
CMAJ Oct 2015, 187 (14) 1029; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.150950
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Regard sur la santé des personnes noires et le racisme anti-Noirs dans les systèmes de santé au Canada
  • A focus on access to health care in Canada
  • L’avenir de la médecine est ici et vous en êtes la trame narrative
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Global health
    • Health care coverage
    • Health economics
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire