Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ digital
    • Subscribe to CMAJ print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ digital
    • Subscribe to CMAJ print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Tianjin chemical clean-up after explosion

Fangliang Xu and Joseph Paul Webb
CMAJ September 22, 2015 187 (13) E404; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5133
Fangliang Xu
Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Paul Webb
Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A massive clean-up of contaminated water is underway in the aftermath of the Aug. 12 chemical explosion in the port city of Tianjin, China that killed 114 people and injured more than 700; 69 people are still missing.

The crater left behind by the explosion quickly filled with 40 000 tons of highly contaminated water that authorities now have to contain and dispose of safely.

On Aug. 17, high levels of dangerous chemicals were evident in 8 out of 76 area water samples, according to Bao Jingling, chief engineer from the Tianjin Environmental Protection Bureau. According to Xinhua News Agency, the site with the highest count exceeded acceptable levels by 28.4 times and included sodium cyanide, an extremely toxic chemical.

By Aug. 20, it was reported that the highest concentration of toxins was 356 times above the acceptable limit, according to Weiyong Tian, director of the Emergency and Accident Investigation Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection.

The Aug. 12 explosion occurred at a warehouse containing 40 types of chemicals, including 700 tons of highly toxic substances, mostly sodium cyanide, according to reports from state media. The cause of the explosion is not yet known. In addition to the human toll, it damaged 17 000 homes and 170 businesses.

On Aug. 15, everyone within three kilometres of the blast was evacuated because of concerns over possible exposure to toxic contaminants.

More than 4000 medical staff at 38 local hospitals are still working to respond to the influx of injured residents, according to the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China.

The Chinese newspaper, Nanfang Daily, reported that the emergency response at the hospital closest to the explosion reached peak levels in the first hour and a half after the blast. By the next morning, Taida Hospital was caring for more than 400 patients, most of whom were suffering burns.

Figure

Rescue workers remove contaminated water from the explosion site in Tianjin on Aug. 19.

Image courtesy of Reuters/Stringer

As of Aug. 20, 674 people were hospitalized and 108 released in Tianjin.

Despite the findings of highly toxic substances at the explosion site, the president of Taida Hospital told Global Times that if there were serious levels of toxic chemicals present, people would have already died.

The United Nations’ top expert on the implications for human rights of hazardous substances called the lack of information “truly tragic.” Special Rapporteur Baskut Tuncak called on the government of China and relevant businesses to ensure complete transparency in the investigation, including into the causes and effects of the explosion.

Tuncak underscored that “information about hazardous substances must be available and accessible in order to protect and respect the rights to life, health, meaningful public participation and an effective remedy, as well as freedoms of expression and the press.”

Volunteer Yuxi Ying, who helped with the clean-up, wrote on Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter, that some volunteers had experienced vomiting and trouble breathing three days after the explosion. She wanted a computed tomographic scan and blood test, but could only afford the latter. After receiving the blood test results, her doctor told her to go home and rest, adding that there was no specific treatment for possible poisoning from the blast.

In terms of air quality, the Tianjin Environmental Monitoring Centre reported no abnormalities among its 12 air-quality monitoring locations within a two-kilometre radius of the blast site. Wurui Wen, chief of the Tianjin Environmental Protection Bureau, said they had not detected any hydrogen cyanide gas so far.

Based on our analysis, it won’t have an obvious impact to humans, he said.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (13)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 13
22 Sep 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tianjin chemical clean-up after explosion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tianjin chemical clean-up after explosion
Fangliang Xu, Joseph Paul Webb
CMAJ Sep 2015, 187 (13) E404; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5133

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Tianjin chemical clean-up after explosion
Fangliang Xu, Joseph Paul Webb
CMAJ Sep 2015, 187 (13) E404; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5133
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Environmental issues
    • Human rights
    • Occupational health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire