Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Malaria vaccine not perfect, but still useful

Carolyn Brown
CMAJ September 22, 2015 187 (13) 954-955; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5132
Carolyn Brown
Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The first vaccine against malaria — and the first against any parasitic disease in humans — has limited efficacy in children of 27% to 39%, but it’s still a useful tool in combatting a long-standing and dire disease, say experts.

“The pattern of disease arising from malaria is still very high” despite measures such as insecticidal bed nets and clearing brush, which is why a vaccine is welcome, explains Dr. Githinji Gitahi, chief executive officer of Amref Health Africa, a humanitarian organization providing training and health services in more than 30 countries, including those most affected by malaria. In sub-Saharan Africa, an estimated 14% of children aged 2 to 10 had malaria in 2013, a prevalence substantially reduced since 2000.

Mosquirix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline, received a positive scientific opinion from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) July 24 even though it provides only partial and time-limited coverage, especially in children, who are most at risk of death due to malaria. Sir Brian Greenwood, principal author of the phase III randomized controlled trial in infants and children in sub-Saharan Africa (published in The Lancet) that formed the basis of the EMA opinion, says his study’s findings are “disappointing.”

“It’s not quite as big a success as we would have wanted,” says Greenwood, a professor of clinical tropical medicine at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in London, UK. Vaccine efficacy was 39% in children 5 to 17 months old and 27% in infants 6 to 12 weeks old, and this required three doses of vaccine plus a booster dose 18 months later. Without a booster, efficacy was even lower, indicating that protection wanes quickly. In addition, the vaccine induces immunity only to malaria caused by the Plasmodium falciparum parasite, the main disease-causing organism in sub-Saharan Africa. A proportion of malaria elsewhere in the world is caused by other Plasmodium parasites against which the vaccine has no effect.

Figure1

The vaccine alone isn’t sufficient to control malaria; insecticidal bed nets and other measures must be retained.

Image courtesy of HendriLombard/iStock

Gitahi says the vaccine is useful nonetheless. “There is that kind of disappointment that the age and coverage is inadequate, but it is incremental. If we can save 1 million more lives through the vaccine, why not?”

Greenwood agrees, pointing out that “we use other vaccines that are not fully effective, such as the influenza vaccine.” The overall effectiveness of the flu vaccine in 2013/14 in the US was 51% according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Malaria is such a common problem that this [efficacy] makes it worthwhile in some areas where infections are not very well controlled,” says Greenwood.

In fact, finding a vaccine that works at all has been a long quest. Greenwood describes earlier efforts as cycles of hope, hype and disappointment. The difficulty is the nature of the disease itself. “The malaria parasite is so much more complicated than a bacteria or virus,” he explains. “It has redundant mechanisms” that allow it to evade immune systems. “It’s a much bigger challenge to develop an immune response.”

With EMA’s opinion, the World Health Organization (WHO) will now convene its Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization and the Malaria Policy Advisory Committee to make a preliminary recommendation on whether and how to use the vaccine by the end of October; a final WHO policy recommendation is expected by November. Gitahi explains that malaria-affected countries then must provide national regulatory approval, which may be expedited through a WHO recommendation.

Procuring the vaccine is also a challenge for low-income countries. GlaxoSmithKline has promised to make the vaccine available at a reduced price — although it hasn’t set that price yet — that would cover manufacturing costs plus a small return. Its profits will go back into research on vaccines for malaria and other tropical diseases. In addition, it will donate 12.5 million doses to PATH, an international non-profit health organization that was a partner in developing the vaccine.

Careful planning of vaccine implementation in communities is the key to success, agree Gitani and Greenwood. Both are concerned that the introduction of a vaccine could lead to complacence about other prevention measures.

“Once the vaccine is available, governments and organizations like ours have to be very careful about the rollout,” says Gitahi. “It should not be about the vaccine but about a two- or three-step ‘this-is-how-you-prevent-malaria’ program. If you roll out [the vaccine] singularly, you could lose the gains that have been made with insecticidal nets.”

Greenwood points out that, similarly, “in some of the HIV vaccine trials there was concern that people would stop using condoms, but that didn’t happen.” He thinks vaccine implementation requires “a proper community education program” that clearly informs those at risk, “Don’t stop using your bed net.”

Gitani hopes that use of the vaccine will lead to continued vaccine development. “Following precedent in medicine and research, once there is one, and once it is field-tested, the challenges are easier to see. In a few years there will probably be vaccines that are improvements over this one.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (13)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 13
22 Sep 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Malaria vaccine not perfect, but still useful
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Malaria vaccine not perfect, but still useful
Carolyn Brown
CMAJ Sep 2015, 187 (13) 954-955; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5132

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Malaria vaccine not perfect, but still useful
Carolyn Brown
CMAJ Sep 2015, 187 (13) 954-955; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5132
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feds update immunization advice with Moderna vaccine approval
  • Canada will have three-digit suicide prevention hotline by 2023
  • Trudeau promises to boost federal health transfers when the pandemic is over
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Travel medicine
    • Global health
    • Drugs: immunologic

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire