Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Rx for data-rich, access-poor researchers

Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ August 11, 2015 187 (11) 797; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5090
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Social insurance information, clinical data, population-based registries, income tax data, surveys — unquestionably Canada is one data-rich nation. Unfortunately for researchers who are interested in national or comparative analyses, much of that data is locked up in provincial research centres. That may change within a year.

A new consortium, the Pan-Canadian Real-world Health Data Network, is being developed by a team of research and policy heavy hitters from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Population Data BC.

“The multiprovince data platform is essential for innovation and transformation of the Canadian health care system,” said Kimberlyn McGrail, a network founder and chair of the advisory board for Population Data BC.

Through the new network, which will include a health and social data council and a national coordinating centre, researchers and policy-makers will access real-word data via shared algorithms. The data could be used for benchmarking, evaluating novel interventions, research and innovation.

“We’re trying to create some connectors that will make it possible for researchers to do cross-provincial research that doesn’t require starting from ground zero every time,” said McGrail at a recent panel discussion at the Canadian Association of Health Services and Policy Research in Montréal. “We will increase robustness of research so that we all mean the same thing by variable x in Manitoba, BC or Ontario.”

The infrastructure will include harmonized common data that are already available, added Dr. Michael Schull, president and CEO of ICES. “Harmonization is the process of making these comparable, by running algorithms so we can do interprovincial analysis.” Available data would include demographic, outpatient, medication, mortality and diagnostic. Over time, other data may be added; Manitoba, for example, has just introduced lab data.

Figure

Ironically, Canada is a data-rich nation with poor access to that information. Ironic, but tragic too, because that data could improve health care in Canada.

Image courtesy of Nikolaev/iStock

The data will stay within the originating province, thus mitigating legislative and privacy barriers. Existing pan-Canadian networks that are more limited in scope, such as the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System and CNODES, show that this approach can work.

The network potentially gives researchers the opportunity to assess and learn from the natural policy experiments inherent in Canada’s system of provincially delivered health care. “We have some consistency in our framework but different implementation, which creates an opportunity to learn from each other that we haven’t taken advantage of to the degree that we could,” McGrail said.

The consortium so far includes 140 researchers, policy-makers and health care providers representing every province. “We’re very committed to responding to the needs of the research community,” said McGrail. “It’s not us building this for us; this is us building for the broader research community.” She encourages people to register at www.prhdn.ca for updates.

First up, is an infrastructure for primary care data. The consortium expects to hear about its application for funding from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation Cyberinfrastructure Challenge 1 Competition by March 2016. If funding is received, the prototype infrastructure could be established within months.

“That’s where everything starts in the health care system,” said Robyn Tamblyn, scientific director at CIHR’s Institute of Health Services and Policy Research. “From there we can easily go to cancer or irritable bowel disease, or other research areas. There is so much we can learn through this network.”

“This is an idea whose time has come,” added Alison Paprica, director of strategic partnerships at ICES. Not every jurisdiction will be ready to do everything all at once, she added. “Some provinces, some sectors may make some advances, but they are no longer in isolation so others can learn and build on what others do.”

More News online

To read more CMAJ news articles, visit cmaj.ca/site/home/news.xhtml

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 11
11 Aug 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rx for data-rich, access-poor researchers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rx for data-rich, access-poor researchers
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Aug 2015, 187 (11) 797; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5090

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Rx for data-rich, access-poor researchers
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Aug 2015, 187 (11) 797; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5090
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Health services

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire