Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

CIHR “dismantling” Aboriginal health research

Paul Christopher Webster
CMAJ July 14, 2015 187 (10) E313-E314; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5059
Paul Christopher Webster
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

The Assembly of First Nations (AFN) is disputing the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) claim that one of its top priorities is research into the causes of the health inequities bedevilling indigenous Canadians.

“We are deeply worried that far from prioritizing Aboriginal health research, CIHR is dismantling it,” says AFN Ontario Regional Chief Stan Beardy, who chairs the Chiefs Committee on Health.

The AFN, which represents 900 000 First Nations people, has long prioritized the need for more research into overcoming Aboriginal health inequities, says Beardy. This need was reinforced by the Apr. 28 Auditor General of Canada report documenting sweeping deficiencies in Aboriginal health care.

In March, CIHR, which receives a billion dollars annually from the federal government, announced that Indigenous health research is its second-highest priority (after research into improved health care for all).

But the CIHR has severely diminished Indigenous scientific leadership at its Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health (IAPH) by scrapping its scientific advisory board, Beardy observes. CIHR also announced that half of the IAPH’s $8.6-million budget, which was formerly all dedicated to Indigenous health research, will be channelled into a funding pool for all 13 CIHR research institutes. CIHR is also eliminating its Network Environments for Aboriginal Health Research, a program for training Aboriginal health scientists.

Even before these cuts, CIHR’s proportional funding for Aboriginal health research had been slipping for six years, notes Malcolm King, the IAPH’s scientific director. Aboriginal people now account for 4.5% of the Canadian population, but CIHR funding has not kept pace with this growth. While total dollar amounts have not been cut, says Jane Aubin, CIHR chief scientific officer, CIHR’s investment has slipped from 3.7% of its total budget in 2009 to 3.3% in 2014.

Figure1

CIHR’s proportional funding for Aboriginal health research had been slipping for six years, says Malcolm King, scientific director of the Institute of Aboriginal Peoples’ Health.

Image courtesy of Paul Christopher Webster

After 75 Aboriginal health scientists wrote to CIHR last autumn to protest cuts, a smaller group of scientists formed the Aboriginal Health Research Steering Committee to spotlight what they describe as a secretive about-face at CIHR.

“The scientists say they are outraged by the CIHR’s actions,” says Beardy, “and we fully agree with them. The CIHR is dismantling Aboriginal health research while claiming to prioritize it.”

In December 2014, AFN leaders passed a resolution calling on CIHR to “restore full funding to the IAPH,” and asked for an immediate meeting with the CIHR governing council. In an Apr. 13 letter to Beardy, CIHR President Dr. Alain Beaudet ignored the request for a meeting and insisted that while half the IAPH’s budget has been taken from its control “there has been no reduction in funds available” to it.

Like Beardy, Fred Wien, who leads the Atlantic Aboriginal Health Research Program and cochairs the Aboriginal Health Research Steering Committee, worries about the CIHR’s claim that it is prioritizing Aboriginal health. “It’s good they identified it as a priority. But the challenge is to make it meaningful.”

In a letter to Beaudet in November, Wien and steering-committee cochair Rod McCormick, who holds the BC Innovation Council Research Chair in Aboriginal Child and Maternal Health, wrote that “the process that the senior leadership of CIHR has used to make these decisions can only be described as top-down, secretive and disrespectful.”

Although the CIHR claimed to have consulted widely on its reforms, says Wien, “to the best of our knowledge, no stakeholders in the Aboriginal community were engaged.” The CIHR says its reforms were guided by recommendations from an external working group, Wien notes, but the IAPH’s scientific advisory board was not given access to that group’s recommendations, which the CMAJ later revealed, did not advise CIHR to scrap the advisory boards (CMAJ 2015; 187:E67).

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 10
14 Jul 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CIHR “dismantling” Aboriginal health research
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CIHR “dismantling” Aboriginal health research
Paul Christopher Webster
CMAJ Jul 2015, 187 (10) E313-E314; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5059

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
CIHR “dismantling” Aboriginal health research
Paul Christopher Webster
CMAJ Jul 2015, 187 (10) E313-E314; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5059
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Senior care costs and demand will nearly double in the next decade
  • Dr. Alika Lafontaine reimagines the narrative of medicine
  • How can medicine close its gender pay gap?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Aboriginal health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire