Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Pocketbook versus patient

Sean A. Kennedy and Mark O. Baerlocher
CMAJ July 14, 2015 187 (10) 758; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1150045
Sean A. Kennedy
Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program (Kennedy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Radiology (Baerlocher), Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark O. Baerlocher
Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program (Kennedy), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Radiology (Baerlocher), Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

We read with interest the systematic review by Jenkins and colleagues.1 Yes, imaging is sometimes overused and is a substantial financial cost for our publicly funded health care system.2,3 However, we question the utility of assessing interventions by measuring reductions in imaging referral rate. This yields information pertinent to cost-savings and does little toward balancing patient care. Referral rates are a poor surrogate for the more important and relevant outcomes of imaging appropriateness and patient-important outcomes (i.e., diagnostic yield and subsequent treatment outcomes).

An Ontario Ministry of Health bulletin, disseminated to all physicians in June 2012 stated that:

OHIP payment eligibility will continue to be limited to services that are medically necessary to the individual patient’s circumstances, informed by the best available evidence. New language has been added to the Schedule of Benefits for Physician Services noting that studies of the lumbar spine should not be routinely ordered or rendered without suspected or known pathology … If the diagnostic services were found to be not medically necessary in accordance with s. 18.2(1) and 18.2(2) of the Health Insurance Act, the physician requesting the diagnostic services will be responsible for repayment.4

Such an aggressive approach to reducing referral rates remains unparalleled in Canada. Threats of financial retribution against referring physicians are a dangerous precedent and could make physicians reluctant to order imaging regardless of whether it is needed. Such decisions would not be guided by concern for the patient but by the desire for cost-savings. This approach was shown to be ineffective in reducing referral rates.5

Though costly, imaging undoubtedly has value. We should not be guided by evidence conceived with cost-savings in mind but by evidence based on patient-important outcomes.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Jenkins HJ,
    2. Hancock MJ,
    3. French SD,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce the use of imaging for low-back pain: a systematic review. CMAJ 2015;187:401–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Tu JV,
    2. Pinfold SP,
    3. McColgan P,
    4. et al
    . Access to health services in Ontario. ICES Atlas 2e. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006.
  3. ↵
    1. Busse J,
    2. Alexander PE,
    3. Abdul-Razzak A,
    4. et al
    . Appropriateness of spinal imaging use in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2013.
  4. ↵
    Ontario Health Insurance Plan: OHIP bulletins: physician services. Toronto: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; 2015. Available: www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/bulletins/4000/bulletin_4000_mn.aspx (accessed 2015 Apr. 12).
  5. ↵
    1. Kennedy SA,
    2. Fung W,
    3. Malik A,
    4. et al
    . Effect of governmental intervention on appropriateness of lumbar MRI referrals: a Canadian experience. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:802–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 187 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 187, Issue 10
14 Jul 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pocketbook versus patient
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pocketbook versus patient
Sean A. Kennedy, Mark O. Baerlocher
CMAJ Jul 2015, 187 (10) 758; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1150045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Pocketbook versus patient
Sean A. Kennedy, Mark O. Baerlocher
CMAJ Jul 2015, 187 (10) 758; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1150045
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Eliminating racism in research
  • Transitioning to outpatient arthroplasty during COVID-19: time to pivot
  • Systemic absorption of intranasal corticosteroids may occur and can potentially affect the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire