Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

A clear synthesis of Canada’s medicare conundrum

Ted Schrecker
CMAJ June 10, 2014 186 (9) 701; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.130930
Ted Schrecker
School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, United Kingdom
Roles: Professor of Global Health Policy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Canadian Medicare: We Need It and We Can Keep It. Stephen Duckett, Adrian Peetoom. McGill–Queen’s University Press; 2013

The authors begin this engaging book with personal anecdotes that show the importance of access to health care that is free at the point of use. Such anecdotes become more important by the year, as many Canadians have lost the memory of how medical bills could destroy families and futures in the user-pay world that preceded medicare. They follow these with succinct refutations of claims about medicare, such as the familiar one that Canada’s system of public health insurance is not financially sustainable in the face of population aging. However, they argue that, for reasons of both cost and equity, coverage under the Canada Health Act should be expanded to include prescription drugs outside hospitals and seniors’ health care at home or in a residential care facility by allied health professionals. They also offer a plain-language account of the recent history of federal–provincial financial transfers, and of the issues that will arise once the growth rate of those transfers slows after 2014.

The authors are candid about the difficulties inherent to Canadian health care and health policy. While emphasizing (as have many others) the importance of team-based primary care, they admit that “a high-quality primary care system is more goal than reality at the moment.” They observe that “[t]he current seniors’ service system is poorly designed and riddled with discontinuities,” with consequences including the continuing and costly problem of acute care hospital bed occupancy by patients who cannot be placed elsewhere. They point out that other countries are well ahead of Canada in expanding the scope of practice of professionals such as pharmacists. They do not underscore, although they should, Canada’s dismal comparative performance in the area of electronic health records. They do provide a useful overview of failed efforts in 2004 and 2005 to articulate meaningful national public-health goals, although their overview of the range of opportunities to improve population health by way of prevention is brief and excessively lifestyle-oriented.

Figure
Image courtesy of McGill–Queen’s University Press

Nothing is new here; the merit of this book is rather in its clear synthesis of a large body of evidence for a nonspecialist audience. Whether those who most need to read it are likely to pay the cover price is another question. At the same time, the approach taken to health politics may be too ingenuous. Questions that are suggested at the end of each chapter are apt and pointed, but is the problem really that “Canadians have not yet put enough pressure on politicians and health care professionals” to respond to the challenges facing the country’s health systems? Or is it rather that powerful vested interests have impeded reform and shaped the health policy agenda in ways that are largely shielded from public scrutiny?

For example, provincial medical associations have repeatedly shown their ability to foreclose certain policy options and protect their economic stake in what Brian Hutchison and colleagues describe as “Canada’s formidable policy legacy of physicians’ autonomy and self-management.”1 Hence, such phenomena as Ontario’s pay-more-and-hope approach to primary care reform, and (in the same province) continued resistance to the idea of expanding the ombudsman’s remit to include hospitals and other institutions. Indeed, the interests of care-providers receive little attention from the authors, who underscore the need for greater accountability, but underestimate the difficulty of achieving it.

Further difficulties arise from the current climate of tax revolt in Canada, driven — as health economist Robert Evans has pointed out — by the determination of the wealthy to roll back the redistribution of resources that is one of the primary rationales for tax-financed public health insurance.2 A reader not already familiar with the landscape of Canadian health policy might therefore finish this book with a false sense of security. The need to preserve and expand medicare while reorganizing provision of care to address Canadians’ changing needs is urgent, but the political obstacles are more formidable than the authors let on.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hutchison B,
    2. Lévesque J-F,
    3. Strumpf E,
    4. et al
    . Primary Health Care in Canada: Systems in Motion. Milbank Q 2011;89:256–88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Evans RG
    . Economic Myths and Political Realities: The Inequality Agenda and the Sustainability of Medicare. Vancouver (BC): Centre for Health Services and Policy Research; 2007. Available: http://medicare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/evansstudy.pdf
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 9
10 Jun 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A clear synthesis of Canada’s medicare conundrum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A clear synthesis of Canada’s medicare conundrum
Ted Schrecker
CMAJ Jun 2014, 186 (9) 701; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130930

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A clear synthesis of Canada’s medicare conundrum
Ted Schrecker
CMAJ Jun 2014, 186 (9) 701; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130930
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Friends
  • Reflections of a chief resident
  • The old woman across the street
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health care coverage

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire