Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Independent research needed to inform end-of-life policy choices

Antoine Boivin, Isabelle Marcoux, Geneviève Garnon, Evert van Leeuwen, Nicholas Mays, Raynald Pineault, Marie-Claude Prémont and Pascale Lehoux
CMAJ February 18, 2014 186 (3) 213; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.114-0012
Antoine Boivin
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Marcoux
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geneviève Garnon
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evert van Leeuwen
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Mays
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raynald Pineault
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie-Claude Prémont
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pascale Lehoux
Department of family and emergency medicine (Boivin, Garnon), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Que.; Faculty of Health Science (Marcoux), University of Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Scientific Institute for Quality Healthcare (van Leeuwen), Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Health Services Research and Policy Department (Mays), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, department de santé publique de Montréal (Pineault); École nationale d’administration publique (Prémont); Institut de recherché en santé publique de l’Université de Montréal, department of health administration, Université de Montréal (Lehoux), Montréal, Que.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In their CMAJ editorial, Flegel and Fletcher1 call for a national dialogue on end-of-life care, arguing that policy change should not be the result of a single court decision.1 In Canada, different medical end-of-life practices, such as treatment withdrawal, use of medication justified by symptom management and use of lethal drugs are being debated.2–4 Concerns about the effects of policies are central to the Canadian debate, and international evidence is quoted by proponents and opponents of legislative reforms.

We recently conducted a scoping review of international evidence on medical end-of-life practices, with a focus on the use of lethal drugs by physicians.5 Key findings from this review are currently relevant to public debate. We found no empirical study on the use of lethal drugs by physicians in Canada, which is surprising given frequent claims that “assisted suicide,” “euthanasia” or “medical aid in dying” are being practised illegally in Canada.

Policy-makers should therefore be careful in drawing conclusions about what is known, and not known, about the likely effects of policies.

Scientific evidence alone cannot provide simple answers to complex end-of-life care dilemmas. However, having robust knowledge publicly available is a precondition for informed democratic deliberation on end-of-life care in Canada.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Flegel K,
    2. Fletcher J
    . Choosing when and how to die: Are we ready to perform therapeutic homicide? CMAJ 2012;184:1227.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵Carter v. Canada(Attorney General), 2012 BCSC886. No. S112688.
    1. Vogel L
    . Legal ambiguities surround authority to make end-of-life decisions. CMAJ 2011;183:E617–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Bill 52: An Act respecting the end-of-life. Quebec (QC): National Assembly of Québec; 2013.
  4. ↵
    1. Boivin A,
    2. Marcoux I,
    3. Mays N,
    4. et al
    . What evidence is available about the medical practice of euthanasia in contexts of prohibition and legalization? A scoping review. Proceeding from the North American Primary Care Research Group conference;2013 Nov. 10–12; Ottawa (ON).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 3
18 Feb 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Independent research needed to inform end-of-life policy choices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Independent research needed to inform end-of-life policy choices
Antoine Boivin, Isabelle Marcoux, Geneviève Garnon, Evert van Leeuwen, Nicholas Mays, Raynald Pineault, Marie-Claude Prémont, Pascale Lehoux
CMAJ Feb 2014, 186 (3) 213; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.114-0012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Independent research needed to inform end-of-life policy choices
Antoine Boivin, Isabelle Marcoux, Geneviève Garnon, Evert van Leeuwen, Nicholas Mays, Raynald Pineault, Marie-Claude Prémont, Pascale Lehoux
CMAJ Feb 2014, 186 (3) 213; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.114-0012
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Health care professionals' comprehension of the legal status of end-of-life practices in Quebec: Study of clinical scenarios
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
  • Beyond wastewater surveillance: refining environmental pathogen detection in the built environment
  • Observational evidence in support of screening for depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire