What really matters in end-of-life discussions? Perspectives of patients in hospital with serious illness and their families
Abstract
Background: The guideline-recommended elements to include in discussions about goals of care with patients with serious illness are mostly based on expert opinion. We sought to identify which elements are most important to patients and their families.
Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design involving patients from 9 Canadian hospitals. We asked older adult patients with serious illness and their family members about the occurrence and importance of 11 guideline-recommended elements of goals-of-care discussions. In addition, we assessed concordance between prescribed goals of care and patient preferences, and we measured patient satisfaction with goals-of-care discussions using the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire.
Results: Our study participants included 233 patients (mean age 81.2 yr) and 205 family members (mean age 60.2 yr). Participants reported that clinical teams had addressed individual elements of goals-of-care discussions infrequently (range 1.4%–31.7%). Patients and family members identified the same 5 elements as being the most important to address: preferences for care in the event of life-threatening illness, values, prognosis, fears or concerns, and questions about goals of care. Addressing more elements was associated with both greater concordance between patients’ preferences and prescribed goals of care, and greater patient satisfaction.
Interpretation: We identified elements of goals-of-care discussions that are most important to older adult patients in hospital with serious illness and their family members. We found that guideline-recommended elements of goals-of-care discussions are not often addressed by health care providers. Our results can inform interventions to improve the determination of goals of care in the hospital setting.
In this issue
Article tools
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Short Graphic Values History Tool for decision making during serious illness
- Evaluation of a process to implement advance care planning conversations in primary care: uptake and patient experience
- Prognostication and shared decision making in neurocritical care
- Randomised trial of a serious illness decision aid (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning
- Prognostic disclosure and quality of life in palliative care: a systematic review
- Quality of end-of-life communication in 2 high-risk ICU cohorts: a retrospective cohort study
- mHOMR: a prospective observational study of an automated mortality prediction model to identify patients with unmet palliative needs
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services
- Appropriateness of intensive care treatments near the end of life during the COVID-19 pandemic
- Evaluation of a program using a physician assistant and an electronic patient-provider communication tool to facilitate discussions about goals of care in older adults in hospital: a pilot study
- Quality of clinicians conversations with patients and families before and after implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program in a hospital setting: a retrospective chart review study
- A novel decision aid to help plan for serious illness: a multisite randomized trial
- Can a patient-directed video improve inpatient advance care planning? A prospective pre-post cohort study
- Supporting shared decision-making about cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a video-based decision-support intervention in a hospital setting: a multisite before-after pilot study
- Decision support intervention (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning: protocol for a randomised trial
- Gaps in public preparedness to be a substitute decision-maker and the acceptability of high school education on resuscitation and end-of-life care: a mixed-methods study
- Improving hospital-based communication and decision-making about scope of treatment using a standard documentation tool
- Role of allied health care professionals in goals-of-care discussions with hospitalized patients and perceived barriers: a cross-sectional survey
- Older patient engagement in advance care planning in Canadian primary care practices: Results of a multisite survey
- Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey
- Barriers and facilitators for goals of care discussions between residents and hospitalised patients
- The prevalence of medical error related to end-of-life communication in Canadian hospitals: results of a multicentre observational study
- Communication in palliative care: talking about the end of life, before the end of life
- Goals of care are important for older adults with severe illness and their families, and are infrequently addressed by health professionals