Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Continued high use of PPIs despite C. difficile risk

Carolyn Brown
CMAJ December 09, 2014 186 (18) 1350; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4927
Carolyn Brown
Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Proton-pump inhibitor prescriptions continue to soar despite evidence dating back to 2004 implicating the drugs in Clostridium difficile infections and subsequent measures to put a brake on prescribing. Experts on both sides of the debate agree the popular stomach-acid suppressants are still being overprescribed despite a Health Canada advisory issued in February 2012. They also agree that the high rate of seniors on proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) raises worries about C. difficile outbreaks in hospitals and nursing homes.

PPIs such as esomeprazole and lansoprazole, were introduced in the early 1990s and soon displaced histamine-2 receptor antagonists as the most-used drugs for gastroesophageal reflux. The Canadian Institute for Health Information states that PPI use by seniors covered by public drug plans increased from 13.1% in 2001/02 to 21.1% in 2007/08; use reached 27% by 2012.

PPIs are invaluable for acid reflux, which can damage the esophagus and cause gastrointestinal bleeding, says Dr. Paul Moayyedi, director of the Division of Gastroenterology at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont., but “there is no doubt they are overprescribed” for other problems for which they are less efficacious.

Concerns came to the fore in 2004, when a CMAJ article (171:33–8) showed a strong correlation between the drugs and C. difficile risk. About a year later, the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology issued a position statement asking members to limit prescriptions to evidence-based indications because of the C. difficile link.

The issue was taken on by Member of Parliament James Lunney (Conservative — Nanaimo–Alberni), who says he began to press Health Canada to take action in 2005.

That didn’t happen until four years later. According to an email from Health Canada, it conducted an in-depth review because of emerging evidence in 2009, which indicated that “findings on this topic remain inconclusive.” Nevertheless, in May 2010, Health Canada asked PPI manufacturers to add this statement to their product monographs: “Treatment with proton pump inhibitors may lead to slightly increased risk of gastrointestinal infections such as Salmonella and Campylobacter and possibly C. difficile.” Health Canada also asked the Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network (DSEN) to study whether PPIs raise the risk of C. difficile infection.

Figure

Health Canada issued a warning eight years after research showed a link between proton-pump inhibitors and C. difficile.

Image courtesy of Wavebreakmedia Ltd/Wavebreak Media/Thinkstock

Executive Director Dr. Robert Peterson says DSEN researchers believed that any research they could do from health data would find no more than what was already evident in the literature. DSEN’s April 2012 report to Health Canada concludes that previous studies show that PPIs are “quite strongly” associated with C. difficile risk, which increases with the dose of PPI. “I can’t think of another query that resulted in an outcome such as this,” says Peterson.

Three months earlier, on Feb. 8, 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration had issued an advisory concerning the C. difficile risk from PPIs; Health Canada followed suit on Feb. 16.

Moayyedi, who conducted a systematic review of PPIs (Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;9:132–9), says “there is definitely an association” between PPIs and C. difficile infections. “The big question is whether that association is causal. I don’t pretend to know the answer.” Since C. difficile is rare in healthy people in the community, Moayyedi continues to prescribe PPIs because “there are people who need them because they improve their quality of life.”

Jason Tetro, a research microbiologist who has written articles on the issue, says, “When faced with a decision in terms of medication, a doctor needs to have something to prescribe that has been shown through Cochrane reviews and clinical trials.”

However, all experts agree that high use of PPIs in hospitals and nursing homes raises the risk of serious C. difficile outbreaks. “In hospitals, we should take care of prescribing these drugs to the right person,” says Moayyedi. Tetro adds, “We should be looking at PPI stewardship … They should not be considered the ‘go-to’ treatment but the last resort.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (18)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 18
9 Dec 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Continued high use of PPIs despite C. difficile risk
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Continued high use of PPIs despite C. difficile risk
Carolyn Brown
CMAJ Dec 2014, 186 (18) 1350; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4927

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Continued high use of PPIs despite C. difficile risk
Carolyn Brown
CMAJ Dec 2014, 186 (18) 1350; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4927
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Drugs: adverse reactions
    • Gastroenterology
    • Geriatric medicine

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire