Review

Assessment and management of falls in older people

Emily Kwan and Sharon E. Straus
CMAJ November 04, 2014 186 (16) E610-E621; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.131330

Worldwide, 30% of people aged 65 years or older who are living in the community fall each year, and among people aged 85 years or older, this proportion increases to nearly 40%.1,2 Falls frequently have serious consequences in this population, with concomitant effects on the health care system. Falls are defined in numerous ways; one commonly used definition is that of the World Health Organization (WHO): “an event which results in a person coming to rest inadvertently on the ground or floor or other lower level.”3

Of older people living in the community who fall, 12% to 42% will have a fall-related injury, with up to 20% requiring medical attention and 10% experiencing a fracture secondary to osteoporosis.4 Older people who have a fall-induced fracture can experience devastating consequences. For example, up to 20% of patients with hip fracture die within the first year, and many survivors do not return to their previous level of functioning.1,4–7 Other fall-related injuries include head injuries in older people.8 Given the serious consequences of falls, physicians need to specifically ask about falling because many patients do not tell their physicians about their previous falls.8 It is also essential that physicians appropriately assess and manage the care of patients who experience a fall. In this article, we present the evidence contained within high-quality systematic reviews pertaining to assessment of patients who have fallen and management of their subsequent care. A summary of the evidence appears in Box 1.

Box 1:

Evidence used in this review

To identify relevant systematic reviews, we did a comprehensive search of the literature (i.e., MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, AgeLine and The Cochrane Library) for articles published between Jan. 1, 2005 and Sept. 30, 2012. We used the following terms in the search: “falls,” “accidental falls,” “aged,” “geriatric,” “elderly,” “senior,” “old age” and “older adult.” We identified additional articles (which may be outside of the range of dates) by reviewing reference lists of previous articles and discussing the topic with experts. We included only articles that were published in English.

We included systematic reviews of studies assessing risk factors for falls, as well as studies evaluating interventions to prevent falls among older people (mean age ≥ 60 yr).

Two reviewers independently evaluated the systematic reviews using AMSTAR (a measurement tool for the assessment of multiple systematic reviews).9 If multiple reviews on a single topic were identified, we included only those that were rated as high quality (defined as a score of ≥ 7 out of 11). If a particular topic was covered by only one review, that review was included even if it scored less than 7 on the AMSTAR tool.

What causes older people to fall?

A clinical examination, addressing potential home hazards, medications, cognitive and visual impairment, functional limitations, orthostatic hypotension, and gait and balance abnormalities, can be used to identify risk factors for falls.

Various factors can increase a person’s risk of falling (Table 1). Because the causes of falls are usually multiple, one approach to assessing these risk factors is through a targeted history and physical examination.

View this table:
Table 1:

Studies evaluating risk factors for falls

History

Older age (i.e., ≥ 65 yr) has been associated with an increased risk of falls. One systematic review2 showed that among patients aged 65 through 74 years, the risk of falling was 31% per year, and among those 80 years of age and older, the risk of falling increased to 37% per year.

The clinician’s interview with the patient (or a caregiver) at the time of presentation should focus on eliciting information about previous falls and their causes, as well as any previous injuries resulting from such falls. The occurrence of a fall increases the risk of additional falls within the next year.2 Symptoms that may cause falls, such as dizziness and palpitations, should also be elicited, as they may be related to potential causes of the fall, such as arrhythmias. Similarly, during the assessment, any injuries due to the current fall should be determined.

Other aspects of the patient’s medical history may provide additional clues about risk factors for falls. For example, in their systematic review, Ganz and colleagues2 identified 2 studies in which cognitive impairment increased the likelihood of a fall (likelihood ratio [LR] 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–9.6; LR 13, 95% CI 2.3–79, respectively). In addition, visual impairment may slightly increase the likelihood of a fall (LR range 1.6–2.0).2 Other comorbidities that have been linked with increased risk of falls include Parkinson disease, arthritis of the knees, sensory impairment, and any comorbidity that impairs gait or balance (e.g., stroke).2

Several medications have been found to increase the risk of falls, so it can be helpful to obtain an accurate medication history. For example, in a systematic review of 22 cohort, cross-sectional and case–control studies, the use of various types of drugs was shown to increase the risk of falls among people aged 60 years and older:10 for sedatives and hypnotics (not including benzodiazepines), odds ratio (OR) 1.47 (95% CI 1.35–1.62); for neuroleptics and antipsychotics, OR 1.59 (95% CI 1.37–1.83); for antidepressants, OR 1.68 (95% CI 1.47–1.91); and for benzodiazepines, OR 1.57 (95% CI 1.43–1.72). Systematic reviews of observational studies involving other medications have shown similar increased risks of falls: for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, OR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01–1.44); and for antihypertensive medications, OR 1.24 (95% CI 1.01–1.50).10–12 Use of cognitive enhancers (i.e., cholinesterase inhibitors) increased the risk of syncope, which may lead to falls (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02–2.30).13

Assessment of the patient’s functional status should include an assessment of activities of daily living (ADLs) (e.g., bathing, toileting, feeding, dressing, grooming and ambulation) and instrumental ADLs (e.g., use of the telephone, shopping, food preparation, managing own finances, housekeeping, laundry and transportation). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies showed that the presence of any difficulties with ADLs was associated with an increased risk of falling (for ADLs, OR 2.26, 95% CI 2.09–2.45; for instrumental ADLs, OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.68– 2.64).14

The social history should address the patient’s living conditions, including various environmental factors and hazards, both indoors and outdoors, such as rugs, bathroom equipment, lighting, bath rails, clutter, wet surfaces, gait aids, assistive devices, weather conditions and footwear. One systematic review of cohort and cross-sectional studies showed an increased risk of falls in the presence of mobility aids in both the community (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.59–2.71) and institutional settings such as retirement homes and long-term care facilities (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.66–1.89). It was concluded that home hazards increased the risk of falling (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.97–1.36).15

Physical examination

The physical examination should focus on injuries related to the fall, as well as factors that may have contributed to its occurrence. In particular, positional blood pressure (both supine and standing) can be assessed to check for orthostatic hypotension, defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg at 1 to 3 minutes after the patient repositions from supine to standing. One study found orthostatic hypotension to predict falls when there was a pulse rate that was less than an increase of 6 beats/min measured 30 seconds after standing up.2

A full neurologic examination with a focus on strength, reflexes, sensory and gait should be done. A clinically detected abnormality of gait or balance may increase the likelihood of a fall (LR range 1.7–2.4).2,16 In their systematic review, Ganz and colleagues2 found one prospective cohort study showing that the presence of any lower extremity disability increased the likelihood of falling (LR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5–2.2). In another systematic review of cohort and cross-sectional studies, Letts and associates15 found that mobility aids were associated with an increased risk of falls both in the community and in institutions.

Are there any tools to help assess the risk of falling?

Systematic reviews have identified several tools to assess the risk of falls, including the Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment Tool, the Berg Balance Scale, the Timed Up and Go test, and the one-legged and tandem stance assessments.17–19 According to the systematic reviews, these tools poorly predict patients who will or will not fall.17–19

What interventions are effective for preventing falls?

Management of falls is complex. There have been numerous studies in different settings (i.e., community, acute hospital or long-term care) that have considered a combination of interventions such as an exercise program, medication review, home assessment and vitamin D supplementation for groups of older people. The causes of falls are usually multiple, and management should be tailored to each patient depending on the history and physical examination. It is unclear whether a single- or multiple-intervention approach should be used for patients who fall. Based on existing evidence, a specified exercise regimen should always be included in the management, but there is support for other interventions such as home assessments and treatment of first-time cataracts.

We identified 19 recent systematic reviews of interventions to prevent falls.20–38 These reviews included studies involving older patients living in various settings (e.g., the community, acute care hospitals and long-term care institutions). Both single and multiple interventions have been tested. Numerous individuals can be involved in the assessment and management of falls, including caregivers, family members, pharmacists, physicians, and occupational and physical therapists.

Community

Tables 2 and 3 outline interventions for preventing falls among older adults. For those living in the community, the following single interventions have been found to be effective: home assessment (best if led by an occupational therapist),21 and various exercise programs including the Otago Exercise Programme20 (Box 2) (associated with reduced fall rates), tai chi,22,23 group exercises, home-based exercises, and exercise training with either gait, balance or functional training.

View this table:
Table 2:

Studies evaluating interventions for preventing falls among older people, by setting

View this table:
Table 3:

Interventions for preventing falls among older people living in the community (Gillespie et al.23)

Box 2:

Otago Exercise Programme39

The Otago Exercise Programme is a system of home-based exercises combining progressively more difficult leg-strengthening and balance-retraining exercises to prevent falls in older people living in the community. It also includes a walking plan. The program is usually delivered by a physiotherapist.

Fear of falling declined following single interventions such as tai chi, use of hip protectors or exercise interventions, and after programs based on combinations of these interventions.24 A multicomponent group exercise intervention showed benefit, with decreases in both the rate of falls and the risk of falling.23 Multicomponent home-based exercise also decreased the rate of falls (rate reduction 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.80).23

Several interventions have been associated with a reduction in the rate of falls (e.g., tai chi, exercise training, multicomponent interventions, home safety assessment, gradual withdrawal of psychotropic medication, use of an antislip shoe device for icy conditions, multifaceted podiatry) or the risk of falling (e.g., multicomponent home-based exercise programs, tai chi, home safety assessment).23 No reduction in the rate of falls or the risk of falling has been shown with vitamin D supplementation as a single intervention for older adults living in the community.23 Similarly, a recent systematic review of randomized trials assessing strength and resistance training found no reduction in the rate or the risk of falling.25 Cognitive behavioural interventions also had no significant effect on the rate or the risk of falling.23 Treatment of vision problems (via single-lens glasses) resulted in an increase in the rate of falls and the risk of falling. Among women, surgery for first-time cataracts reduced the rate of falls, but surgery for second-time cataracts did not.23

Six recent systematic reviews of multicomponent interventions in older adults living in the community assessed various combinations of interventions, including combinations of exercises (balance, aerobic and/or strengthening exercises), vitamin D supplementation, home assessment, comprehensive geriatric assessment, reviews of vision and medications, and follow-up by an occupational therapist and physiotherapist.21–24,26,27 It was unclear whether a multicomponent intervention was better than a single intervention for reducing falls.27 One systematic review indicated that multicomponent interventions may have benefit in terms of reducing the rate of falls but not the risk of falling.23 Similarly, it is unclear from studies of multicomponent interventions which interventions might be most effective in preventing falls.

Retirement homes and long-term care

Two systematic reviews28,29 examined studies of interventions to prevent falls among those living in retirement homes or long-term care institutions. Vitamin D supplementation was associated with a reduction in the rate of falls but did not reduce the risk of falling (rate ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.55–0.95, risk ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.89–1.09).28 Studies of multicomponent interventions were done in both reviews. One review29 showed some efficacy but did not provide a compiled average in risk for all studies used. The other review28 initially showed no significant reduction in rate of falls or risk of falling, but post hoc analysis did show significance.

Acute care hospitals

Two systematic reviews28,30 examined studies of multicomponent interventions to prevent falls among patients admitted to acute care hospitals. These interventions reduced the rate of falls and the risk of falling relative to usual care (rate ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.51–0.72; risk ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.77–0.95).28 There was a small but significant benefit with a multicomponent intervention (including exercise) that differed from “usual hospital care.”30

Mixed settings

Eight recent systematic reviews31–38 evaluated interventions to prevent falls among patients living in various settings, including the community, acute care hospitals and long-term care institutions. Studies of vitamin D supplementation showed a benefit in reducing the risk of falls.31–33 Tai chi also decreased the risk but not the rate of falling.34 A systematic review on whole-body vibration programs (combined with strength and dynamic exercises) have shown some benefit compared with a control group (which did the same exercise as the intervention group but without a vibration platform) but not compared with a conventional group (which performed specific exercises based on guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine).35 Similar to the results of studies involving community-dwelling older adults, multicomponent interventions to prevent falls in all settings decreased the number of falls and injuries from falls (relative risk 0.91, 95% CI 0.82–1.02, and in number of fall-related injuries relative risk 0.90, 95% CI 0.68–1.20).36 One systematic review found an improvement in patients’ quality of life with evaluation of the extent to which measurement of a person’s participation in interventions to prevent falls (as assessed by the individual’s functioning in his or her various life roles) was reported in trials of such interventions.37 Another systematic review concluded that participation in exercise may improve participation in life roles (i.e., social interaction; employment; use of transportation; and community, social and civic life).38

How can this review be applied in practice?

On the basis of the evidence reviewed, we suggest that assessment of a patient who has fallen should incorporate the history and physical examination as described. This assessment can then be used to target implementation of strategies to prevent falls in the future. Exercise interventions such as tai chi and the Otago Exercise Programme have been shown to be beneficial and should be considered. A stepwise management plan that is applicable to all those at risk for falling is challenging to outline because individuals have different reasons for falling.

Interventions to address prevention have also been studied. In both primary and secondary prevention of falls, exercise has been proven to be beneficial and should be recommended. Further consideration of interventions is dependent on the patient’s setting.

Gaps in knowledge

Although we found information about numerous risk factors for falls, evidence is lacking about tools for assessing the risk of falls that are accurate, precise and easy to use. Optimal management for patients who have had falls is also unclear. Although many high-quality systematic reviews of interventions to prevent falls have been conducted, none have ranked all of the available interventions using a network meta-analysis approach; our group has undertaken such a study, which is currently in progress.40 Similarly, it is unclear whether a single intervention is as good as a multicomponent approach for preventing falls. In addition, although exercise has been shown to be beneficial for patients who have had a fall, the types of exercise and the requirements of each exercise component in a multicomponent intervention vary.

Conclusion

Falls are common among older people and can have devastating consequences. Physicians should ask patients about falls during a comprehensive assessment and include an assessment for relevant risk factors. When a patient has a fall, through a careful history and physical examination, the clinician may be able to identify risk factors that can be targeted for interventions to prevent future falls. At a minimum, older patients who have experienced a fall should be counselled about starting an exercise program (e.g., tai chi or the Otago Exercise Programme) to prevent falls and associated fractures.

KEY POINTS

  • A targeted history and physical examination, covering potential home hazards, cognitive and visual impairment, functional limitations, medications, orthostatic hypotension, and gait and balance abnormalities, can be used to identify risk factors for falls.

  • No specific assessment tools have been shown to accurately predict the risk of falls.

  • Numerous interventions (single and multicomponent) have been shown to decrease the risk of falls.

  • At a minimum, patients who have experienced a fall should be encouraged to participate in an approved exercise program to help prevent further falls.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Peggy Robinson for assistance with manuscript preparation.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Disclaimer: Sharon Straus is an associate editor for the CMAJ and was not involved in the editorial decision-making process for this article.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Contributors: Both authors drafted and revised the article, and approved the final version submitted for publication. Both authors are guarantors of the work.

  • Funding: Sharon Straus receives funding from a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Akyol AD
    . Falls in the elderly: What can be done? Int Nurs Rev 2007;54:191–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ganz DA,
    2. Bao Y,
    3. Shekelle PG,
    4. et al
    . Will my patient fall? JAMA 2007;297:77–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Falls. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2012. Available: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs344/en/index.html (accessed 2013 Aug. 8).
  4. ↵
    Medical Advisory Secretariat. Prevention of falls and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling seniors. Toronto (ON): Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series 2008;8. Available: www.hqontario.ca/english/providers/program/mas/tech/reviews/pdf/rev_aic_falls_20081002.pdf (accessed 2013 Aug. 8).
    1. Annweiler C,
    2. Montero-Odasso M,
    3. Schott AM,
    4. et al
    . Fall prevention and vitamin D in the elderly: an overview of the key role of the non-bone effects. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. de Kam D,
    2. Smulders E,
    3. Weerdesteyn V,
    4. et al
    . Exercise interventions to reduce fall-related fractures and their risk factors in individuals with low bone density: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int 2009;20:2111–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. McGilton KS,
    2. Mahomed N,
    3. Davis AM,
    4. et al
    . Outcomes for older adults in an inpatient rehabilitation facility following hip fracture (HF) surgery. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009;49:e23–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Schonnop R,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Feldman F,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence of and factors associated with head impact during falls in older adults in long-term care. CMAJ 2013;185:E803–10.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Shea BJ,
    2. Grimshaw JM,
    3. Wells GA,
    4. et al
    . Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007;7:10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Woolcott JC,
    2. Richardson KJ,
    3. Wiens MO,
    4. et al
    . Meta-analysis of the impact of 9 medication classes on falls in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1952–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hegeman J,
    2. van den Bemt BJ,
    3. Duysens J,
    4. et al
    . NSAIDs and the risk of accidental falls in the elderly: a systematic review. Drug Saf 2009;32:489–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Sterke CS,
    2. Verhagen AP,
    3. Van Beeck EF,
    4. et al
    . The influence of drug use on fall incidents among nursing home residents: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2008;20:890–910.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kim DH,
    2. Brown RT,
    3. Ding EL,
    4. et al
    . Dementia medications and risk of falls, syncope, and related adverse events: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59: 1019–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bloch F,
    2. Thibaud M,
    3. Dugué B,
    4. et al
    . Episodes of falling among elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of social and demographic pre-disposing characteristics. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2010;65:895–903.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Letts L,
    2. Moreland J,
    3. Richardson J,
    4. et al
    . The physical environment as a fall risk factor in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional and cohort studies. Aust Occup Ther J 2010;57:51–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Muir SW,
    2. Berg K,
    3. Chesworth B,
    4. et al
    . Quantifying the magnitude of risk for balance impairment on falls in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:389–406.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Gates S,
    2. Smith LA,
    3. Fisher JD,
    4. et al
    . Systematic review of accuracy of screening instruments for predicting fall risk among independently living older adults. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45: 1105–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Oliver D,
    2. Papaioannou A,
    3. Giangregorio L,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the STRATIFY tool for prediction of falls in hospital patients: How well does it work? Age Ageing 2008;37:621–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Scott V,
    2. Votova K,
    3. Scanlan A,
    4. et al
    . Multifactorial and functional mobility assessment tools for fall risk among older adults in community, home-support, long-term and acute care settings. Age Ageing 2007;36:130–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Thomas S,
    2. Mackintosh S,
    3. Halbert J
    . Does the ‘Otago exercise programme’ reduce mortality and falls in older adults?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2010;39:681–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Clemson L,
    2. Mackenzie L,
    3. Ballinger C,
    4. et al
    . Environmental interventions to prevent falls in community-dwelling older people a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Aging Health 2008; 20:954–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gillespie LD,
    2. Robertson MC,
    3. Gillespie WJ,
    4. et al
    . Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD007146.
  23. ↵
    1. Gillespie LD,
    2. Robertson MC,
    3. Gillespie WJ,
    4. et al
    . Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(9):CD007146.
  24. ↵
    1. Zijlstra GA,
    2. van Haastregt JC,
    3. van Rossum E,
    4. et al
    . Interventions to reduce fear of falling in community-living older people: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:603–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Orr R,
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Singh MF
    . Efficacy of progressive resistance training on balance performance in older adults. Sports Med 2008; 38:317–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Michael YL,
    2. Lin JS,
    3. Whitlock EP,
    4. et al
    . Interventions to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review. Evidence Syntheses No. 80. AHRQ Publication No. 11-05150-EF-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; December 2010.
  27. ↵
    1. Campbell AJ,
    2. Robertson MC
    . Rethinking individual and community fall prevention strategies: a meta-regression comparing single and multifactorial interventions. Age Ageing 2007; 36:656–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Cameron ID,
    2. Murray GR,
    3. Gillespie LD,
    4. et al
    . Interventions for preventing falls in older people in nursing care facilities and hospitals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1): CD005465.
  29. ↵
    1. Cusimano MD,
    2. Kwok J,
    3. Spadafora K
    . Effectiveness of multifaceted fall-prevention programs for the elderly in residential care. Inj Prev 2008;14:113–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. de Morton NA,
    2. Keating JL,
    3. Jeffs K
    . Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (1):CD005955.
  31. ↵
    1. Kalyani RR,
    2. Stein B,
    3. Valiyil R,
    4. et al
    . Vitamin D treatment for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:1299–310.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bischoff-Ferrari HA,
    2. Dawson-Hughes B,
    3. Staehelin HB,
    4. et al
    . Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2009;339:b3692.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Murad MH,
    2. Elamin KB,
    3. Abu Elnour NO,
    4. et al
    . The effect of vitamin D on falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:2997–3006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Low S,
    2. Ang LW,
    3. Goh KS,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review of the effectiveness of Tai Chi on fall reduction among the elderly. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2009;48:325–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Sitjà-Rabert M,
    2. Rigau D,
    3. Fort Vanmeerghaeghe A,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy of whole body vibration exercise in older people: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:883–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Gates S,
    2. Fisher JD,
    3. Cooke M,
    4. et al
    . Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2008;336:130–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Vaapio SS,
    2. Salminen MJ,
    3. Ojanlatva A,
    4. et al
    . Quality of life as an outcome of fall prevention interventions among the aged: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2009;19:7–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Fairhall N,
    2. Sherrington C,
    3. Clemson L,
    4. et al
    . Do exercise interventions designed to prevent falls affect participation in life roles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2011;40:666–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Robertson M,
    2. Campbell A
    . Otago Exercise Programme to prevent falls in older adults. New Zealand: a home-based individually tailored strength and balance retraining programme. Wellington (New Zealand): ACC; 2003. Available: www.acc.co.nz/PRD_EXT_CSMP/groups/external_providers/documents/publications_promotion/prd_ctrb118334.pdf (accessed 2013 Mar. 8).
  40. ↵
    1. Tricco AC,
    2. Cogo E,
    3. Holroyd-Leduc J,
    4. et al
    . Efficacy of falls prevention interventions: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2013;2:38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 16
4 Nov 2014

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Assessment and management of falls in older people
Emily Kwan, Sharon E. Straus
CMAJ Nov 2014, 186 (16) E610-E621; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.131330
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Collections