Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Salon

Revisiting Rodriguez

Svend Robinson
CMAJ November 04, 2014 186 (16) 1264; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.141213
Svend Robinson
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Over 20 years ago, on Feb. 12, 1994, Sue Rodriguez died in my arms in her Saanich, British Columbia home. Over the three years following her diagnosis, Sue had been living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and had fought with passion and determination for the right to choose when she should die and to have a physician’s assistance in dying. When the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against her on Sept. 30, 1993, by a narrow 5–4 majority, she quietly said to me, “The Court may have spoken, but I have the last word.” Any doctor who supported her, however, risked prosecution under section 251 of the Criminal Code and a lengthy prison term. The Canadian Medical Association’s (CMA’s) official position on the issue was to strongly oppose any change in the law.

Despite this, I heard from physicians across the country who strongly supported Sue in her efforts to change the law, many of whom shared stories from their own personal experiences of the cruelty and injustice of the current law. It was also clear that doctors were in fact quietly honouring the requests of terminally ill patients to support them in their desire to end their lives at the time of their choosing, despite the risk of prosecution. Sue was fortunate to have the support of one such doctor.

Sue strongly supported palliative care and pain management, but she also noted that even the best quality palliative care did not always relieve pain, suffering and anguish. And if it did, too often the price to be paid was living like a “zombie,” in her words. She also argued that giving terminally ill people the option to choose the time of their death would mean that many would live longer lives, dying a natural death, instead of ending their life earlier while still physically able to do so without the assistance of a doctor.

Today, if she were still alive, Sue would face a very different landscape. Twenty years after her death, we are now able to witness the actual impact of changes in the law in several jurisdictions, including Oregon. As BC Supreme Court Justice Lynn Smith wrote in her powerful 2012 decision decriminalizing physician-assisted suicide in Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), it is clear that the dire “slippery slope” predictions of those opposed to a change in the law have not come to pass. Only a very small number of terminally ill patients have chosen to end their lives with the assistance of a doctor, and only under very tightly controlled circumstances.

Figure

Svend Robinson and Sue Rodriguez at a February 1993 press conference.

Image courtesy of Courtesy of Svend Robinson

If Sue were living in Quebec today, she would have the right to the support of a physician to end her life. The National Assembly of Québec voted, by a large majority in favour of Bill 52, to allow physician-assisted death. Quebec is leading on this fundamental social-justice issue, just as they did three decades earlier on the issue of access to safe abortion. It took a courageous doctor, Henry Morgentaler, to challenge that law. No such doctor has emerged to lead the struggle to change the law on assisted suicide in Canada. Certainly, many were moved by the eloquent and passionate plea of respected SARS doctor, Donald Low, before his own death. As he said, “A lot of clinicians have opposition to dying with dignity. I wish they could live in my body for 24 hours, and I think they would change that opinion.”

The CMA is still grappling with the issue; however, at its annual meeting in August, delegates voted to support “the right of all physicians, within the bounds of existing legislation, to follow their conscience when deciding whether to provide medical aid in dying as defined in CMA’s policy on euthanasia and assisted suicide.” Incoming CMA President Dr. Chris Simpson noted that there are some forms of suffering that even the best end-of-life care can’t alleviate.

The Supreme Court of Canada will once again be considering this issue, as the Carter v. Canada appeal begins in October. Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, who was one of the four dissenting judges in Sue’s appeal in 1993, will preside. Courts, politicians and yes, physicians and the CMA, have come a long way in the past 20 years in understanding and accepting the need to change the law on assisted suicide. One can only hope that this time, the Supreme Court will support the struggle waged with such courage and dignity by Sue Rodriguez over 20 years ago.

Do you have an opinion about this article? Post your views at www.cmaj.ca. Potential Salon contributors are welcome to send a query to salon{at}cmaj.ca.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 16
4 Nov 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Revisiting Rodriguez
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Revisiting Rodriguez
Svend Robinson
CMAJ Nov 2014, 186 (16) 1264; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.141213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Revisiting Rodriguez
Svend Robinson
CMAJ Nov 2014, 186 (16) 1264; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.141213
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Making a case for the inclusion of refractory and severe mental illness as a sole criterion for Canadians requesting medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • End-of-life care & decisions
    • Health policy
    • History of medicine
    • Human rights
    • Medicine & the law (including forensic medicine)
    • Palliative medicine
    • Patient's perspective
    • Suicide

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire