Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

CMA wants seniors’ care on federal agenda

Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ October 07, 2014 186 (14) E507; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4884
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Realistic Costs for Care
    Mark Frankel
    Posted on: 08 September 2014
  • Posted on: (8 September 2014)
    Page navigation anchor for Realistic Costs for Care
    Realistic Costs for Care
    • Mark Frankel, CEO

    With regard to the CMA article dated August 18, 2014, entitled "CMA wants seniors' care on federal agenda", written by Barbara Sibbald, I'd like to make the following comments: Although I applaud your medical association for highlighting the needs of seniors and their families and for your call for a national strategy, at least one of the cost of care figures cited by the CMA seems highly questionable. We are a speciali...

    Show More

    With regard to the CMA article dated August 18, 2014, entitled "CMA wants seniors' care on federal agenda", written by Barbara Sibbald, I'd like to make the following comments: Although I applaud your medical association for highlighting the needs of seniors and their families and for your call for a national strategy, at least one of the cost of care figures cited by the CMA seems highly questionable. We are a specialist service and research organization that, among other activities, conducts an annual fee survey of more than 1,500 non-profit and commercial home care and residential care providers for seniors in all 10 provinces across Canada. The resulting cost figures from our survey for home care are quite different from the one cited in your article.

    Specifically, your citation of home care costs of $55 for one day seems quite misleading. Based on our annual survey, home personal care in Canada in 2013 typically cost from a low of about $19 per hour to a high of $37 per hour, depending mostly on location and the agency supplying the care. Median national cost of charges for one hour of companionship/supervision/attendant care is $22.36. Accordingly, a "day" of home care or 8 hours of care typically costs about $168, not the $55 cited by CMA. Furthermore, if a "day" is defined as 24 hours of care, to enable a fair comparison to hospital care or long term care in a nursing home, the daily cost is double or triple that $168 cost. Finally, our data show that in 2013 the national median cost of skilled nursing delivered via home care was $51.64 per hour. If even one hour of skilled nursing per day is also included in the "one day" of home care, then the total cost per day is even higher.

    I suppose that the only way one could even muse about a home care cost of $55 a day would be to assume that the provider was an untrained, unsupervised and unregulated live-in "nanny" or "maid" who is also receiving room and board. There are too many complications to even begin to fully discuss why this form of care is usually an unrealistic and inadequate alternative to nursing home or hospital care. But suffice it to say that caring for frail, chronically ill and often disabled and/or demented patients is a job that requires more than a $6.88 an hour nanny or cleaning lady.

    While the logic of your argument about shifting chronic care seniors out of acute care beds and hospitals remains very valid, it is important in making your case to government and to the public to work with real data and realistic cost savings estimates. Sincerely, Mark Frankel, Ph.D., C.Psych. President and CEO LifestageCare Inc.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (14)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 14
7 Oct 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CMA wants seniors’ care on federal agenda
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CMA wants seniors’ care on federal agenda
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Oct 2014, 186 (14) E507; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4884

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
CMA wants seniors’ care on federal agenda
Barbara Sibbald
CMAJ Oct 2014, 186 (14) E507; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4884
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Longer family medicine residency: Boon or bane to doctor supply?
  • The evolving picture of long COVID
  • When are shared decisions false choices?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Geriatric medicine
    • Professional conduct & regulation

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire