Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Advice varies for suspected Lyme disease

Laura Eggertson
CMAJ September 02, 2014 186 (12) 899-900; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4850
Laura Eggertson
Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Ask Laura Weeks the best way to remove a tick, and she names the options. There’s the traditional straight-on tweezer pull, the counter-clockwise twist with a special tick-removal device, or popular folk remedies like rubbing the tick with olive oil or using dish soap applied on a cotton ball before covering the tick with a Band-Aid.

“I’ve done a lot of research,” says Weeks, who is a senior research fellow with an integrative oncology clinic.

But Weeks isn’t researching tick removal as part of her job. She’s obsessed with ticks because she lives in Perth, Ontario, currently a hotbed of tick-borne bacterial infection such as Lyme disease, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi.

“There are a few people in the community who have been affected by Lyme quite severely,” says Weeks. “When you see people unable to work and there’s no treatment, it’s worrisome.”

In fact, antibiotics are an effective treatment for Lyme disease, particularly in its early phrases. However, inadequate testing for the bacteria, confusion over what — if anything — to do in the immediate aftermath of a tick bite, and uncertainty about which ticks transmit infection are contributing to the concerns in rural areas where Lyme is increasing.

Once endemic to the United States, Europe and parts of Asia, Lyme is now well-established in British Columbia’s southern mainland and Vancouver Island, and parts of Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and southern and eastern Ontario. Ticks bearing the bacteria may also be in other parts of Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) cautions.

The changing climate is partly responsible for the recent spread of Lyme disease, according to PHAC. In 2013, there were an estimated 500 cases of Lyme disease reported in Canada, up from 128 in 2009, when Lyme became a reportable disease. There are likely three times as many people with the under-reported disease, says Steven Sternthal, acting director general of PHAC’s Centre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases. The number of cases is expected to climb to more than 10 000 Canadians affected annually by the 2020s, Sternthal recently testified at the parliamentary Standing Committee on Health. There are an estimated 300 000 cases per year in the US.

Figure

An estimated 500 cases of Lyme disease were reported in Canada in 2013, up from 128 in 2009.

Image courtesy of Dragisa/iStock/Thinkstock

Not all Canadian doctors are aware that Lyme disease is even in Canada, Sternthal told the committee. The committee studied proposed legislation to create a national Lyme disease strategy, a bill currently making its way through the Senate before its expected passage later this year.

Jim Wilson, president of the Canadian Lyme Disease Foundation says medical professionals aren’t getting adequate guidance about how they should treat the bite of any tick that could be carrying Borrelia. “There’s an awful lot of harm being done by current [medical] practices.” Medical advice varies doctor to doctor and region to region.

One Ontario patient who spoke to CMAJ reported being told by both Telehealth and emergency department staff that he needed a tetanus shot after a tick bite. Tetanus is not an effective treatment or prevention against Lyme disease.

Other patients report being told they should have the tick tested before beginning treatment. Some patients say they were prescribed one or two doses of antibiotics immediately after a bite. Still others say doctors told them not to worry about treatment unless they exhibit symptoms.

The Canadian Lyme Disease Foundation advises that anyone bitten should remove the tick and be prescribed 21 to 28 days of a broad-spectrum antibiotic, such as doxycycline, without waiting for test results to determine whether the tick was carrying Lyme or any other infection. Wilson says the three- to four-week antibiotic regimen is standard in Europe.

Current tests may return false-negative results depending on how soon they are performed, and those available in Canada do not capture all strains of Borrelia, according to PHAC. “The agency is committed to improving diagnostic testing,” Sternthal said.

Meanwhile, PHAC recommends that doctors diagnose on the basis of clinical assessment, rather than relying on lab tests. Once patients have early symptoms, PHAC recommends 14 to 21 days of antibiotic treatment. However, PHAC suggests that post-exposure antibiotic therapy be considered in known endemic areas.

Dr. Allen Steere, the Massachusetts physician who published the first conclusive account of Lyme disease in 1977, says not all patients present with the classic bull’s eye–shaped skin rash that many doctors look for to diagnose Lyme. Steere, an infectious disease specialist at the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital, believes that chronic Lyme disease exists and can result from misdiagnosis as another type of illness or lack of treatment initially.

The best advice for people is to prevent tick bites by avoiding tick-infested areas, using repellant, tucking pants into socks and wearing closed-toed shoes, and conducting daily tick checks.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 12
2 Sep 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Advice varies for suspected Lyme disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Advice varies for suspected Lyme disease
Laura Eggertson
CMAJ Sep 2014, 186 (12) 899-900; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4850

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Advice varies for suspected Lyme disease
Laura Eggertson
CMAJ Sep 2014, 186 (12) 899-900; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4850
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Infectious diseases
    • Medical careers
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire