Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Correcting the record

Stephen Frank
CMAJ July 08, 2014 186 (10) 779; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.114-0053
Stephen Frank
Policy Development and Health, Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association, Toronto, Ont.
Roles: MPhil (Finance), Vice President
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The conclusions in “The increasing inefficiency of private health insurance in Canada”1 about the trends in medical loss expense ratios for insured supplemental health benefit plans are incorrect and ultimately misleading.

The data used in this article1 are aggregate-level data for group and individual benefits in Canada. The data includes a disparate set of coverages that have different market drivers. The loss ratios vary greatly for each set of coverages, as do their historical trends.

Broadly, the group benefits business can be broken into two areas: supplemental health insurance plans (e.g., drugs, dental, travel, paramedical, vision, hospital rooms) and income replacement (i.e., short and long-term disability) and other nonmedical coverages (e.g., creditors disability insurance, critical illness).

Loss ratios for specific coverages can vary substantially from year to year. I can confirm that the average medical loss ratio for insured supplemental health insurance plans between 1997 and 2012 was 85%, with the medical loss ratio coming in at 82% in 2012. The medical loss ratio for supplemental health benefit plans over this period has been relatively flat.

The negative trend in the aggregate-level data that is highlighted in the article1 is being driven by the income replacement and other nonmedical expense coverages. Income replacement coverages (the largest component) have experienced a decreasing loss ratio over this period. These benefits are paid over many years and are funded by premiums collected and investment income earned on the assets purchased with the premium. The decreasing loss ratio is in part due to an increasingly larger portion of the benefit being funded by premium rather than investment income as a result of the falling and sustained low-interest rate environment in Canada over that period.

The private health insurance industry is highly competitive, with over 25 insurers providing group health benefits. Should a client feel that a proposed premium adjustment is unwarranted at his plan’s renewal date, the client can negotiate with the insurer or transfer his business to a new insurer.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Law MR,
    2. Kratzer J,
    3. Dhalla IA
    . The increasing inefficiency of private health insurance in Canada. CMAJ 2014; Mar. 24 [Epub ahead of print].
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 10
8 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Correcting the record
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Correcting the record
Stephen Frank
CMAJ Jul 2014, 186 (10) 779; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.114-0053

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Correcting the record
Stephen Frank
CMAJ Jul 2014, 186 (10) 779; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.114-0053
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Correcting the record
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
  • Beyond wastewater surveillance: refining environmental pathogen detection in the built environment
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire