Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash

Donald A. Redelmeier, Sharon C. May, Deva Thiruchelvam and Jon F. Barrett
CMAJ July 08, 2014 186 (10) 742-750; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.131650
Donald A. Redelmeier
Department of Medicine (Redelmeier, May), University of Toronto; Evaluative Clinical Sciences Program (Redelmeier, May, Thiruchelvam), Sunnybrook Research Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Redelmeier, Thiruchelvam); Division of General Internal Medicine (Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Centre for Leading Injury Prevention Practice Education & Research (Redelmeier); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dar@ices.on.ca
Sharon C. May
Department of Medicine (Redelmeier, May), University of Toronto; Evaluative Clinical Sciences Program (Redelmeier, May, Thiruchelvam), Sunnybrook Research Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Redelmeier, Thiruchelvam); Division of General Internal Medicine (Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Centre for Leading Injury Prevention Practice Education & Research (Redelmeier); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deva Thiruchelvam
Department of Medicine (Redelmeier, May), University of Toronto; Evaluative Clinical Sciences Program (Redelmeier, May, Thiruchelvam), Sunnybrook Research Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Redelmeier, Thiruchelvam); Division of General Internal Medicine (Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Centre for Leading Injury Prevention Practice Education & Research (Redelmeier); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon F. Barrett
Department of Medicine (Redelmeier, May), University of Toronto; Evaluative Clinical Sciences Program (Redelmeier, May, Thiruchelvam), Sunnybrook Research Institute; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Redelmeier, Thiruchelvam); Division of General Internal Medicine (Redelmeier), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; Centre for Leading Injury Prevention Practice Education & Research (Redelmeier); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), University of Toronto; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Barrett), Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Unmerited conclusions
    Katherine Darbyshire
    Posted on: 08 August 2014
  • Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash: considering surveillance bias
    Sarah Buchan
    Posted on: 21 May 2014
  • Statistics are Fun but Potentially Misleading
    Jeffrey M. McKillop
    Posted on: 15 May 2014
  • Posted on: (8 August 2014)
    Unmerited conclusions
    • Katherine Darbyshire, Family Physician

    I was disconcerted (and by that I mean, rather angry) by the conclusion of the article "Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash", in the July 8 issue. The first assertion claims that the "study suggests that serious motor vehicle crashes [MVC's] are COMMON [emphasis mine] during the second trimester".It may have been supposed to say, compared with non-pregnancy, or with other trimesters, but as stated this is certainly...

    Show More

    I was disconcerted (and by that I mean, rather angry) by the conclusion of the article "Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash", in the July 8 issue. The first assertion claims that the "study suggests that serious motor vehicle crashes [MVC's] are COMMON [emphasis mine] during the second trimester".It may have been supposed to say, compared with non-pregnancy, or with other trimesters, but as stated this is certainly NOT shown by this study, nor is it endorsed by an informal survey of colleagues, or my own 30 yrs of practice. The authors go on to suggest that pregnant women should be advised to drive safely : condescending toward both pregnant women and their caregivers, to a degree breathtaking to this feminist heart. I do not know if there is a role for caregivers to advise ALL patients to drive safely, but I, for one, do not intend to single out my pregnant patients to remind them of the rules of the road and the ways in which they might be better drivers.

    K.Darbyshire, MD, FCFPC

    Conflict of Interest:

    None

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (21 May 2014)
    Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash: considering surveillance bias
    • Sarah Buchan, PhD Student
    • Other Contributors:

    Redelmeier and colleagues bring to attention an important issue regarding an increased risk of serious motor vehicle accidents in pregnancy. The authors define their outcome as a crash that resulted in a visit to an emergency department, identified using ICD codes related to vehicle crashes. This article was read with keen interest, considering its implications for safety in pregnancy. However, unmasking bias (also refer...

    Show More

    Redelmeier and colleagues bring to attention an important issue regarding an increased risk of serious motor vehicle accidents in pregnancy. The authors define their outcome as a crash that resulted in a visit to an emergency department, identified using ICD codes related to vehicle crashes. This article was read with keen interest, considering its implications for safety in pregnancy. However, unmasking bias (also referred to as surveillance bias) (1) should be considered due to its potential contribution to the observed effect. Sackett explains unmasking (detection signal) bias, in that "an innocent exposure may become suspect if, rather than causing a disease, it causes a sign or symptom which precipitates a search for the disease" (2). Given the potential adverse outcomes of trauma during pregnancy (3), women may be more likely to be transported to hospital or hospitalized following a collision, regardless of their injury severity, than non-pregnant women (4). The authors' finding that pregnant women were less likely to be admitted to the hospital than at baseline may suggest that women are visiting the ER out of caution for less severe injuries that may or may not require admission. In this study, pregnant women were more likely than at baseline to attend the ER following motor vehicle collision even as passengers, further supporting this notion.

    Sarah Buchan, MSc, PhD Student, Dalla Lana School of Public Health

    Ariel Pulver, MSc, PhD Student, Dalla Lana School of Public Health

    Joel G Ray, MD MSc, St. Michael's Hospital

    1. Haut ER and Pronovost PJ. Surveillance bias in outcomes reporting. JAMA. 2011;305(23):2462-2463.

    2. Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis. 1979;32(1- 2):51-63.

    3. Vivian-Taylor J, Roberts CL, Chen JS and Ford JB. Motor vehicle accidents during pregnancy: a population-based study. BJOG. 2012;119(4):499-503.

    4. Weiss HB and Strotmeyer S. Characteristics of pregnant women in motor vehicle crashes. Inj Prev. 2002;8(3):207-210.

    Conflict of Interest:

    Dr. Ray had a chance to review this interesting manuscript prior to its submission to CMAJ

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (15 May 2014)
    Statistics are Fun but Potentially Misleading
    • Jeffrey M. McKillop

    I read with great interest Redelmeier,May,Thiruchelvam, and Barrett's (2014) article on pregnancy and risk of a potential motor vehicle accident. These authors suggest that risk for a motor vehicle accident increases at the beginning of the second trimester of pregnancy and then subsides to baseline by the third trimester. The assumption underneath this risk is that potential cognitive deficits and/or fatigue associated...

    Show More

    I read with great interest Redelmeier,May,Thiruchelvam, and Barrett's (2014) article on pregnancy and risk of a potential motor vehicle accident. These authors suggest that risk for a motor vehicle accident increases at the beginning of the second trimester of pregnancy and then subsides to baseline by the third trimester. The assumption underneath this risk is that potential cognitive deficits and/or fatigue associated with the second trimester of pregnancy may account for this increased risk. However, a more obvious variable may account for these results. Adverse weather is a noted factor in motor vehicle accidents with winter months accounting for a higher frequency of collisions. Similarly, the frequency of birth by month shows a trend toward greater number of births in early and late summer. Counting backwards, on average, most women will enter their second trimester during those months with the most adverse weather conditions, specifically January through March. When the accident occurred (that is which month) may be as, in not more, important then stage of pregnancy.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 10
8 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash
Donald A. Redelmeier, Sharon C. May, Deva Thiruchelvam, Jon F. Barrett
CMAJ Jul 2014, 186 (10) 742-750; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.131650

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Pregnancy and the risk of a traffic crash
Donald A. Redelmeier, Sharon C. May, Deva Thiruchelvam, Jon F. Barrett
CMAJ Jul 2014, 186 (10) 742-750; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.131650
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • High risk of traffic crashes in pregnancy: Are there any explanations?
  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Maternal trauma due to motor vehicle crashes and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Approach to making the availability heuristic less available
  • Effect of an educational leaflet on the frequency of seat belt use and the rate of motor vehicle accidents during pregnancy in Japan in 2018: a prospective, non-randomised control trial with a questionnaire survey
  • Direct medical costs of motorcycle crashes in Ontario
  • Pregnancy and risk of a traffic crash
  • Pregnancy and risk of a traffic crash
  • High risk of traffic crashes in pregnancy: Are there any explanations?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Emergency department use following incentives to provide after-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort study
  • Physician choices in pulmonary embolism testing
  • Symptoms associated with a positive result for a swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in Alberta
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Reproductive health, infertility & pregnancy
    • Public health

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire