Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Discrimination “toxic” to minorities, says public health expert

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ January 07, 2014 186 (1) E3-E4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4661
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Subtle, day-to-day racism may be a stronger driver of health inequalities than previously suspected, warns a professor at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts.

“The evidence to date suggests it’s a toxic and largely neglected stressor that has pervasive, adverse effects over and above education and income,” David Williams told members of the North American Primary Care Research Group at a Nov. 9 meeting in Ottawa, Ontario.

Between 2003 and 2006, racial health disparities cost the United States some $1.24 trillion — a toll conventionally chalked up to differences in socioeconomic status, said Williams. In theory, that means a wealthy, educated black person should experience similar health outcomes to an equally wealthy and educated white person.

“Today, we know the pattern is much more complicated,” said Williams. Even after controlling for factors such as income, education and occupation, “minorities have higher rates of diseases, get sick at younger ages, have more severe illness and die sooner than whites.”

Williams cited towering infant mortality rates among African American women as a prime example. “The best-off black women, those with a college degree, have the lowest infant mortality rate among African American women. But their rate is about three times as high as for other women with a college degree, and higher than the infant mortality rates for the worst-off white, Asian and Latina women who have not finished high school.”

Although social status can have a powerful effect on health outcomes across racial groups, it appears moving up the ranks of society confers a lesser boon on minorities than their white peers. For example, “blacks and Hispanics receive less income at the same level of education, and have less wealth and purchasing power at equivalent income levels.”

Figure1

Mounting evidence suggests minority patients receive poorer quality medical care than whites, even when socioeconomic status is taken into account.

Image courtesy of © 2014 Thinkstock

The same is true in other “race conscious” societies, including Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, added Williams. “This profoundly says that there’s something else about race, over and above economic status, that’s driving variations in health.”

Meanwhile, there’s mounting evidence that personal experiences of “everyday discrimination” — such as receiving inferior service or being treated as less intelligent than others — can have diverse negative health impacts.

“People who report high levels of everyday discrimination are more likely to have coronary artery calcification, high levels of inflammation and high blood pressure,” said Williams. “Women who report this discrimination during pregnancy give birth to lower-weight infants, and among the elderly, those who report high levels of discrimination experience more rapid decline, poorer sleep and increased mortality over time.”

The prevalence of such discrimination in the health care system is particularly concerning, he said. “Across virtually every therapeutic intervention, ranging from the most high-tech procedures to the most elementary interventions, minority patients receive fewer procedures and poorer quality medical care than whites,” and the pattern persists “even after differences in health insurance, socioeconomic status, stage and severity of disease, comorbidity and type of medical facility are taken into account.”

Williams attributes the trend to providers’ unconscious biases. “I’ve talked to many medical groups about this, and the typical reaction is, ‘I know I don’t stereotype because I’m not racist.’ But these processes are activated more quickly than cognition, so the people who say they would never do this are the people perfectly set up to do it.”

The only way to counter such biases is to “consciously decide and take time to focus on the unique qualities of patients,” he said. “These processes are not just about race; if you own negative stereotypes about gay, fat or old people, you need to be aware that you will unthinkingly treat them differently.”

Williams also called for increased partnerships between primary care facilities and other community services to deliver “care within a social context.”

He highlighted a successful medical–legal partnership at the Boston Medical Center as a cost-effective model. Primary care providers at the facility can refer patients to an on-staff lawyer, who in turn manages a volunteer legal team. “A child with asthma in a moldy apartment will not breathe symptom-free, regardless of the medication you give her, if the underlying living conditions are not addressed. A call from a lawyer can make a huge difference in terms of landlord response.”

According to Williams, a three-year study of a similar program in Cincinnati, Ohio, showed that 89% of referrals led to positive outcomes, such as improved housing, benefits and education, helping both targeted patients and a much larger group of family members.

“Health system reform is crucial but insufficient to improve health,” he urged. “We need to work actively with other sectors to bring resources together to modify where and how we live, learn, work and play, and in this process, attend first to those farthest behind.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 186 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 186, Issue 1
7 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Discrimination “toxic” to minorities, says public health expert
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Discrimination “toxic” to minorities, says public health expert
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Jan 2014, 186 (1) E3-E4; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4661

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Discrimination “toxic” to minorities, says public health expert
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Jan 2014, 186 (1) E3-E4; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4661
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (1)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Medical trainees warn practice permits will drive away doctors
  • Coupons for health care a sign of creeping privatization?
  • Canada’s health system is among the least green
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Public health
    • Patient education

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire