Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Exemplary medicine: why doctors should practise what they preach

John Fletcher
CMAJ May 14, 2013 185 (8) 635; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.130514
John Fletcher
See
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

See also the article by Frank and colleagues on page 649 and at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.121028 and the article by Redelmeier and colleagues on page E337 and at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.122047

There can be many good reasons why the care patients receive varies, but when there is no good reason, such differences are unfair. Research in this issue of CMAJ gives 2 examples of unfair differences in care for which doctors themselves can take responsibility.1,2

Using routine health information systems covering roughly half of Israel’s population, Frank and colleagues1 compared the preventive health care habits of physicians and their patients. They found that a higher percentage of patients received a specific preventive measure if their doctor had received the same measure than if their doctor had not. For example, 49% of patients who were eligible received flu vaccination if their doctor had also received flu vaccination, but only 43% of eligible patients received the vaccination if their doctor had not. Perhaps doctors who have had flu vaccinations are just more interested in prevention across the board? Apparently not, because the rates of mammography were the same among patients of doctors who did or did not receive the flu vaccination. Conversely, 70% of eligible patients received a mammogram if their doctor had received one, but only 66% received a mammogram if their doctor had not. These associations appeared to be specific for each preventive measure examined in this study.

One might argue that the percentage differences in preventive health care are modest because they only amount to a few percent. However, many patients decide whether to have a flu vaccination quite independently of what their personal doctor might think. Some patients simply book a visit to a nurse or vaccination clinic each year, and some have no intention of ever having a flu vaccination because they do not believe that it works well enough. It is only among patients who are unsure that a doctor is likely to influence the decision. The 6% or so differences among all patients may reflect a much larger proportion of those who were unsure. In that context, the effects reported by Frank and colleagues1 seem quite important and suggest that doctors’ own health-seeking behaviour influences the advice and care they give to their patients.

Do the results of a study in Israel have any relevance in Canada? Personally, I think they do. But if you think that doctors in Canada practise in a very different way than they do in Israel, or if you think that patients make choices about preventive health care in a very different way, then a dose of skepticism is reasonable.

A second research article2 in this issue suggests that, in another context and country, doctors’ attitudes affect their practice. Redelmeier and colleagues2 examined organ donation rates in hospitals across Ontario. Patients who die in almost any hospital in well-populated areas of Ontario could become organ donors. The logistics of harvesting and transport are not insurmountable, especially for large hospitals in urban areas near transplant centres. What their research showed, though, was that donor rates per 100 deaths were 4 times higher in hospitals with transplant programs than in large general hospitals without such programs. It is difficult to believe that such a large difference could be due to differences in case mix or donor suitability. It is far more likely that doctors in transplant centres counsel patients and their families in ways that are different from those who are more distanced from the practice. Hospital culture and the example that other doctors set is likely influencing practice.

In both of these examples, the advice that patients or their families received differed not because of their needs but because of their doctors’ behaviours or attitudes. Because this is unfair, we should pay more attention to doctors’ personal health practices and to professional culture. There are 10 provincial physician health programs in Canada, as well as the Canadian Medical Association’s own, each providing help and support when physicians run into health problems. Canada has an annual conference on physician health, and the next one is this fall in Calgary, Alberta. As a profession, we should work with these organizations to broaden the scope of physician health beyond illness. Individually, doctors can “try harder,” but as a group we should take action to change professional culture. Doctors should be encouraged to reflect on how their attitudes and behaviours may influence the care they give. Because it is good medical practice, this encouragement should be part of continuing medical education and become part of our professional standards so that physicians can advise their patients with commitment and integrity.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml

References

  1. ↵
    1. Frank E,
    2. Dresner Y,
    3. Shani M,
    4. et al
    . The association between physicians’ and patients’ prevention practices. CMAJ 2013;185:649–53.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Redelmeier D,
    2. Markel F,
    3. Scales DC
    . Organ donation after death in Ontario. CMAJ 2013;185:659.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 8
14 May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exemplary medicine: why doctors should practise what they preach
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Exemplary medicine: why doctors should practise what they preach
John Fletcher
CMAJ May 2013, 185 (8) 635; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130514

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Exemplary medicine: why doctors should practise what they preach
John Fletcher
CMAJ May 2013, 185 (8) 635; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130514
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • The association between physicians’ and patients’ preventive health practices
  • Organ donation after death in Ontario: a population-based cohort study
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Adoption of positive health behaviour among primary care physicians: a cross-sectional pilot study from Lebanon
  • Routine Assessment and Promotion of Physical Activity in Healthcare Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • La vaccination contre le SRAS-CoV-2 devrait être obligatoire pour exercer la médecine au Canada
  • Reconstruire de façon plus équitable
  • Contrer les variants plus virulents du SRAS-CoV-2 demandera une réponse plus ingénieuse à la pandémie
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire