Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?

Ananda Chatterjee, Onil Bhattacharyya and Navindra Persaud
CMAJ April 02, 2013 185 (6) 465-467; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121830
Ananda Chatterjee
From the Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Chatterjee, Bhattacharyya, Persaud), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Bhattacharyya, Persaud), St. Michael’s Hospital; and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Bhattacharyya, Persaud) University of Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Onil Bhattacharyya
From the Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Chatterjee, Bhattacharyya, Persaud), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Bhattacharyya, Persaud), St. Michael’s Hospital; and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Bhattacharyya, Persaud) University of Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Navindra Persaud
From the Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Chatterjee, Bhattacharyya, Persaud), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Bhattacharyya, Persaud), St. Michael’s Hospital; and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (Bhattacharyya, Persaud) University of Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?
    Bakul Dalal
    Posted on: 23 May 2013
  • Posted on: (23 May 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?
    How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?
    • Bakul Dalal, Co-Chair, GPAC
    • Other Contributors:

    We read with interest your suggestions for testing guidelines on your CMAJ Commentary "How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?" BC Guidelines would like to inform you that we have used your suggested method of public consultation for each of our guidelines for the past 10 years.

    BCGuidelines.ca is overseen by the Guidelines and Protocols Advisory Committee (GPAC), a joint committee of the BC Medical...

    Show More

    We read with interest your suggestions for testing guidelines on your CMAJ Commentary "How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?" BC Guidelines would like to inform you that we have used your suggested method of public consultation for each of our guidelines for the past 10 years.

    BCGuidelines.ca is overseen by the Guidelines and Protocols Advisory Committee (GPAC), a joint committee of the BC Medical Association and the BC Ministry of Health. As such we are able to access the primary care community within BC to seek input on each of our guidelines. New guidelines, and existing guidelines that have undergone substantive changes, are subject to such an "external peer review" to ensure guidelines are clearly written, appropriate, practical, and free from serious oversights or errors.

    Each guideline is written by a working group made up of general practitioners, a cross-section of relevant specialists, a pharmacist, and is facilitated by a research officer (RO) from the Ministry of Health. Additional appropriate content experts are invited as guests, as necessary. The working group reviews current evidence and drafts the guideline. The draft is then approved by GPAC for external review. During the external review process, the guideline, along with a questionnaire, is mailed to a random sample of general practitioners (typically numbering between 400 and 800 individuals), relevant specialties (10-20 percent sample per specialty) including nurse practitioners and other allied health professionals, and stakeholders. Additional appropriate reviewers may be chosen for specific guidelines in consultation with Ministry of Health medical consultants and research officers. The list of stakeholders is made up of key contacts in the areas of pharmacy (Pharmaceutical Services Division of the Ministry of Health, Therapeutics Initiative), laboratory procedures (BC Association of Laboratory Physicians, BC Biomedical Laboratories, Lifelabs Medical Laboratory Services, Laboratory, Diagnostic and Blood Services Branch of the Ministry of Health), health authorities, MSP billing, public health, and health professional colleges and associations.

    The questionnaire is made up of approximately ten questions falling under the headings: clarity, applicability, utilization and overall assessment. There is also space for open-ended comments on the guideline. After the external review process is completed (one to two months), the compiled results and comments are presented to the working group for consideration and any necessary changes. Before a guideline can be finalized by GPAC and ultimately the Medical Services Commission of BC, the feedback received from the external review must be reconciled.

    If you have any further questions about the BC guidelines process, please contact us at hlth.guidelines@gov.bc.ca or review our website BCGuidelines.ca.

    Sincerely,

    Bakul I. Dalal, MD Stephanie Power Co-Chair And the Members of the Guidelines and Protocols Advisory Committee

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 6
2 Apr 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?
Ananda Chatterjee, Onil Bhattacharyya, Navindra Persaud
CMAJ Apr 2013, 185 (6) 465-467; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121830

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
How can Canadian guideline recommendations be tested?
Ananda Chatterjee, Onil Bhattacharyya, Navindra Persaud
CMAJ Apr 2013, 185 (6) 465-467; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121830
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Potential for harm
    • Difficulty assessing effect on care
    • Potential solutions
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Optimizing the language and format of guidelines to improve guideline uptake
  • Guidelines and public consultations
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
  • Antiracism as a foundational competency: reimagining CanMEDS through an antiracist lens
  • Keeping the front door open: ensuring access to primary care for all in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire