Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors

Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Frida Emanuelsson, Britta Tendal, Jørgen Hilden, Isabelle Boutron, Philippe Ravaud and Stig Brorson
CMAJ March 05, 2013 185 (4) E201-E211; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.120744
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ah@cochrane.dk
Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frida Emanuelsson
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Britta Tendal
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jørgen Hilden
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabelle Boutron
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Ravaud
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stig Brorson
From the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Hróbjartsson, Thomsen, Emanuelsson, Tendal) Rigshospitalet Department 7811, Copenhagen, Denmark; the Department of Biostatistics (Hilden), University of Copenhagen, Denmark; the French Cochrane Centre (Boutron, Ravaud), Assistance Publique (Hotel Dieu), Paris, France; and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Brorson), Herlev University Hospital, Denmark.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Is blinding always necessary? & Interpretation in meta-analysis?
    Pankaj B Shah
    Posted on: 25 March 2013
  • Posted on: (25 March 2013)
    Page navigation anchor for Is blinding always necessary? & Interpretation in meta-analysis?
    Is blinding always necessary? & Interpretation in meta-analysis?
    • Pankaj B Shah, Professor

    At the outset, I would like to congratulate CMAJ and authors for wonderful research paper on evidence regarding Blinding and bias. I feel there is undue importance given to blinding in RCTs. Though it is very important for results to be unbiased by blinding technique, it can not bypass objectivity of measurements whenever possible. Except subjective phenomenon like perception after taking intervention, some of the psych...

    Show More

    At the outset, I would like to congratulate CMAJ and authors for wonderful research paper on evidence regarding Blinding and bias. I feel there is undue importance given to blinding in RCTs. Though it is very important for results to be unbiased by blinding technique, it can not bypass objectivity of measurements whenever possible. Except subjective phenomenon like perception after taking intervention, some of the psychological parameters and interventions where blinding is not possible due to ethical reasons like surgery vs medical management, all RCTs should measure objective parameter if possible. It may be difficult to combine in the meta-analysis such studies where blinding not possible with other types of where objective parameter may be appropriate.

    Dr.Pankaj B Shah, Professor,Dept.of Community Medicine, SRMC & RI,SRU, Chennai-India

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 4
5 Mar 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Frida Emanuelsson, Britta Tendal, Jørgen Hilden, Isabelle Boutron, Philippe Ravaud, Stig Brorson
CMAJ Mar 2013, 185 (4) E201-E211; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120744

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors
Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Frida Emanuelsson, Britta Tendal, Jørgen Hilden, Isabelle Boutron, Philippe Ravaud, Stig Brorson
CMAJ Mar 2013, 185 (4) E201-E211; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120744
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multicentre, randomised, single-blind, parallel group trial to compare the effectiveness of a Holter for Parkinsons symptoms against other clinical monitoring methods: study protocol
  • EULAR recommendations for the reporting of ultrasound studies in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs)
  • Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy
  • Considerations on the strengths and limitations of using disease-related mortality as an outcome in clinical research
  • Blinding in randomised clinical trials of psychological interventions: a retrospective study of published trial reports
  • Effects of adding ivabradine to usual care in patients with angina pectoris: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
  • Should antidepressants be used for major depressive disorder?
  • Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study
  • Blindsided: challenging the dogma of masking in clinical trials
  • Fools gold? Why blinded trials are not always best
  • Catalogue of bias: observer bias
  • Feasibility of surgical randomised controlled trials with a placebo arm: a systematic review
  • Why did it take 19 months to retrieve clinical trial data from a non-profit organisation?
  • Hyperbaric oxygen did not improve symptoms in children with cerebral palsy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The experiences of family members of deceased organ donors and suggestions to improve the donation process: a qualitative study
  • Uncovering SARS-COV-2 vaccine uptake and COVID-19 impacts among First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples living in Toronto and London, Ontario
  • Antiviral drug treatment for nonsevere COVID-19: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Research methods & statistics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire