Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

A clearer picture of physician income

Roger Collier
CMAJ February 19, 2013 185 (3) E143-E144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4402
Roger Collier
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A new measure of physician income called average gross clinical payment, which provides a more comprehensive picture by taking into account both fee-for-service and alternative payment plans, indicates the average doctor in Canada earned $307 482 in 2010–2011, up 3.1% from the previous year, according to the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).

“In the past, we reported on average physician compensation based only on fee-for-service payments, but fee-for-service is a declining proportion of total physician remuneration,” says Geoff Ballinger, manager of health human resources at CIHI, which released its latest figures on physician income in the report National Physician Database 2010–2011 (https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productFamily.htm?locale=en&pf=PFC2032&lang=en&media=0).

Though previous reports were “footnoted extensively” to make it clear that figures were based only on fee-for-service payments, there still appeared to be confusion among some readers, says Ballinger. In other words, you would be incorrect if you thought the average physician income figure of $288 549 indicated in the previous CIHI report on the physician database represented total compensation. Various methodologies were discussed to provide a more accurate indicator of total compensation and the metric settled upon was average gross clinical payment.

“It tends to change the order of the rankings of the provinces, who is making more and who is making less,” says Ballinger.

In the current report, the average gross clinical payment ranged from lows of $235 768 (Prince Edward Island[PEI]) and $250 486 (Nova Scotia) to highs of $340 020 (Ontario) and $349 655 (Alberta). But in the previous report, where provinces were ranked according to gross fee-for-service payments for physicians with at least $60 000 in payments, the bottom spot was occupied by Quebec ($226 718). Other provinces that moved spots under the new metric include New Brunswick (dropping from third position to sixth) and Ontario (rising from fourth position to second).

Figure

Using its new method of calculating physician earnings, the Canadian Institute of Health Information indicates that doctors grossed an average of $307 482 in 2010–2011.

Image courtesy of © 2013 Thinkstock

Alternative clinical payments (salary, sessional, capitation, etc.) account for 27.4% of all compensation, according to the report. In 1999–2000, by comparison, that figure was only 10.6%. The proportion of total clinical payments that aren’t of the fee-for-service variety also varies widely between provinces. In Nova Scotia, for example, 46.6% of payments were alternative, but in Alberta, only 14.8% came from outside the fee-for-service system.

Alternative forms of clinical payment may be on the rise as provinces attempt to revise the incentive structure for physicians, says Ballinger. “One of the limitations of fee-for-service is that it’s very volume-driven. Doctors provide more services to increase their incomes. Many provinces have brought in alternative forms of payment with the intention that doctors wouldn’t be so volume-driven.”

Though it provides a more comprehensive picture of average physician compensation, incorporating alternative payments into its compensation calculations has a substantial limitation, according to Ballinger. The level of detail about alternative payments is far inferior to that about pay-for-service payments. For example, CIHI doesn’t have enough data to report average gross clinical payment according to medical specialty.

“Many provinces do have that data and are currently sharing it with us, but we don’t have it across the country,” says Ballinger. (The provinces that have provided the specialist information are Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, PEI, New Brunswick and British Columbia.)

The average gross fee-for-service income for specialists who received at least $60 000 in payments is listed by province. In Ontario, for example, internal medicine topped the list of medical specialities ($409 994) and ophthalmology ranked highest for surgical specialities ($702 023). In Newfoundland and Labrador, the lowest-paid medical specialty was neurology ($226 918) and the lowest-paid surgical speciality was general surgery ($319 967).

Overall, payments to Canadian physicians reached $20.2 billion in 2010–2011, up 6% from the previous year. This increase was smaller than the one seen in 2009–2010 (7.9%) and 2008–2009 (9.7%). Ontario doctors received the most money ($8.3 billion), more than double than that received by second-place Quebec. PEI physicians received the lowest amount for providing clinical services ($75.7 million).

Other findings from National Physician Database 2010–2011 include:

  • Canada has 65 704 physicians. Ontario has the most (24 554). PEI has the least (321)

  • Percentage of physicians paid mainly through alternative modes: 18.7%

  • Total number of medical services paid for by fee-for-service billings: 245.3 million

  • Number of services provided by family physicians: 144.5 million

  • Number of services provided by specialists: 100.8 million

  • Average cost per medical service: $53.95

  • Average cost per service provided by a family physician: $39.85

  • Average cost per service provided by a specialist: $74.17.

All physician payments are reported on the basis of gross, rather than net, income, the report states. “Because overhead expenses vary across jurisdictions and specialties and are not clearly reported, CIHI does not adjust payment figures to account for them.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 3
19 Feb 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A clearer picture of physician income
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A clearer picture of physician income
Roger Collier
CMAJ Feb 2013, 185 (3) E143-E144; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4402

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A clearer picture of physician income
Roger Collier
CMAJ Feb 2013, 185 (3) E143-E144; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4402
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire