Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Urinary catheterization and female genital mutilation

Abdulrahim A. Rouzi
CMAJ February 19, 2013 185 (3) 235; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111588
Abdulrahim A. Rouzi
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aarouzi@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 30-year-old African woman was admitted in labour at 37 weeks’ gestation of her fifth pregnancy for emergency cesarean delivery. This was her first assessment for the current pregnancy at this hospital. She had a cesarean delivery with each of her previous pregnancies. On examination, she was found to have type III female genital mutilation that had been done during childhood.

She required urinary catheterization, which was performed by cleaning the genital area with antiseptic solution, inserting a lubricated sterile Sim speculum underneath the scar (Figure 1), pulling the speculum outward, and then lifting it in an upward direction to expose the urethra for cleaning with antiseptic solution and insertion of a Foley catheter under direct visualization (Figure 2). Routine cesarean delivery under general anesthesia was done without complications.

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1:

A lubricated Sim speculum is passed underneath the scar tissue in a 30-year-old pregnant woman with type III female genital mutilation.

Figure 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2:

The Sim speculum is lifted upward to expose the urethra and allow insertion of the catheter.

The World Health Organization estimates that between 100 and 140 million girls and women worldwide have experienced female genital mutilation, and around 3 million girls undergo some form of the procedure each year.1 Type III female genital mutilation (also known as infibulation) is defined by the World Health Organization as narrowing of the vaginal orifice with creation of a covering seal by cutting and appositioning the labia minora and/or the labia majora, with or without excision of the clitoris.1 The complications associated with this procedure are well documented.2

Inserting a catheter into the urinary bladder can be difficult in women who have had female genital mutilation, particularly type III, in which the scar tissue covers the urethral meatus and part of the vaginal introitus. In emergency situations in which urinary catheterization is required,3 the technique described above can be used to allow access for the urinary catheter (Appendix 1, available at www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.111588/-/DC1). Defibulation (i.e., cutting the scar tissue) is another option.4

See the following videos online: Appendix 1: Insertion of a urinary catheter for a patient with female genital mutilation. www.cmaj.ca/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1503/cmaj.111588/-/DC1.

Editor’s note:

Presented as a video presentation at the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, Oct. 15–19, 2011, Orlando, Fla.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

References

  1. ↵
    World Health Organization. Eliminating female genital mutilation: an interagency statement. Geneva (Switzerland): The Organization; 2008. Available: web.unfpa.org/upload/lib_pub_file/756_filename_fgm.pdf (accessed 2011 Oct. 24).
  2. ↵
    Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Female genital mutilation and its management. Green top guideline, no 53. London (UK): The College; 2009. Available: www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/GreenTop53FemaleGenitalMutilation.pdf (accessed 2012 Feb. 13).
  3. ↵
    1. Rosenberg LB,
    2. Gibson K,
    3. Shuman JF
    . When cultures collide: female genital cutting and US obstetrics practice. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:931–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. McCaffrey M,
    2. Jankowska A,
    3. Gordon H
    . Management of female genital mutilation: the Northwick Park Hospital experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:787–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 3
19 Feb 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Urinary catheterization and female genital mutilation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Urinary catheterization and female genital mutilation
Abdulrahim A. Rouzi
CMAJ Feb 2013, 185 (3) 235; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111588

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Urinary catheterization and female genital mutilation
Abdulrahim A. Rouzi
CMAJ Feb 2013, 185 (3) 235; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111588
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Editor’s note:
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Parechovirus infections in infants
  • Radiation dermatitis in a patient treated for hepatocarcinoma
  • Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Article Types
    • Clinical Images
  • Topics
    • Urology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire