Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Provinces reject federal call for prosecution of over-prescribing physicians

Adam Miller
CMAJ February 05, 2013 185 (2) E84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4377
Adam Miller
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Policing the over-prescription of opioids is a matter best left to local jurisdictions and there’s absolutely no need for intrusive federal measures to limit the authority of some physicians to prescribe such drugs, several provinces say.

The provinces add that their existing oversight systems are effectively constraining suspect prescribing patterns by physicians and abuse of pain-relieving medications. In British Columbia, for example, “we feel that our system has a number of protections built into it that limit abuse of narcotics like oxycodone, and we are confident in the work of our college [of physician and surgeons] to investigate any concerns raised with them,” says Ryan Jabs, spokesman for the province’s health ministry.

The provinces also uniformly rejected Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq’s controversial offer to step into the opioid fray to crack down on over-prescribing physicians in those provinces that aren’t up to the task and are willing to cede jurisdiction to the federal government (www.cmaj.ca/site/earlyreleases/4theRecord.xhtml).

Nor do they appear inclined to forward names of overprescribing physicians to the federal government for prosecution.

“We haven’t forwarded any cases to Health Canada,” says Doug Spitzig, manager of the prescription review program at the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Saskatchewan. “We have better capacity of dealing with the over-prescribing than the feds do.”

Saskatchewan does not appear to be the exception as Health Canada indicates that no province has taken up Aglukkaq’s highly political offer, which was clearly part of a bid to deflect attention from the federal decision not to ban the production of generic forms of oxycodone (www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-4326).

The Controlled Substances and Tobacco Directorate has not received a single report from a province over the past year identifying an instance of over-prescribing of oxycodone, Stéphane Shank, senior media relations advisor for Health Canada, writes in an email.

Figure

Educating physicians about the appropriate prescription of painkillers is the best means of reducing over-prescribing, provincial spokesmen say.

Image courtesy of © 2013 Thinkstock

Ontario says there’s no need for federal involvement in the monitoring of opioid prescriptions or the prosecution of over-prescribers. “The federal intervention we need is to ban generic OxyContin,” says Zita Astravas, spokesperson for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Alberta, similarly, says inappropriate prescribing of oxycodone is an issue best addressed in-house. “Prescribing practices are really a CPSA [College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta] issue,” Howard May, a spokesman for Alberta Health, writes in an email.

Other provinces, meanwhile, indicate that they are investigating alternative means of constraining the availability of opioids. New Brunswick, for example, is “working with the other federal and provincial drug plans to align our approaches as much as possible with respect to generic OxyContin. In particular, the Atlantic provincial drug plans are reviewing the benefit status of all opioids to help ensure appropriate access and use,” says Mélanie Sivret, spokesperson for the Department of Health.

Similarly, the Northwest Territories indicates that it is examining mechanisms to limit access to addictive substances. “We think this can be achieved by improving measures to ensure that the drugs are provided only to patients with valid medical need for them,” says Damien Healy, spokesperson for province’s department of health and social services. “Additionally, we are taking steps to improve support to our clinicians at the front line to make sure that they have access to guidance on best practice in the area of pain management.”

Rather than prosecuting over-prescribing physicians, the provinces also say their primary response to the problem is to attempt to educate doctors about appropriate use of painkillers.

In BC, for example, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia is working with roughly 200 physicians, at any given time, using an “education intervention” model that lasts about two years.

“These are not bad doctors. They benefit from our educational intervention and so do their patients,” says Dr. Galt Wilson, deputy registrar for the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia. “The solution is an educational one. We take our responsibility to educate and remediate physicians very seriously and make a significant investment in it.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 2
5 Feb 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Provinces reject federal call for prosecution of over-prescribing physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Provinces reject federal call for prosecution of over-prescribing physicians
Adam Miller
CMAJ Feb 2013, 185 (2) E84; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4377

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Provinces reject federal call for prosecution of over-prescribing physicians
Adam Miller
CMAJ Feb 2013, 185 (2) E84; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4377
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Addiction medicine
    • Pain

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire