Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Traffic-related air pollution and health in Canada

Michael Brauer, Conor Reynolds and Perry Hystad
CMAJ December 10, 2013 185 (18) 1557-1558; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121568
Michael Brauer
School of Population and Public Health (Brauer, Reynolds, Hystad); and Liu Institute for Global Issues (Reynolds), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michael.brauer@ubc.ca
Conor Reynolds
School of Population and Public Health (Brauer, Reynolds, Hystad); and Liu Institute for Global Issues (Reynolds), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Perry Hystad
School of Population and Public Health (Brauer, Reynolds, Hystad); and Liu Institute for Global Issues (Reynolds), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Canadian cities generally have good air quality; however, exposure to outdoor air pollution continues to elicit considerable negative health effects. Estimates suggest that there are 21 000 premature deaths attributable to air pollution in Canada each year,1 nearly 9 times higher than the number of deaths due to motor vehicle collisions.

Emerging evidence specifically links the traffic-related component of air pollution to negative effects on health. A comprehensive critical review of the epidemiologic and toxicologic literature published in 2010 concluded that exposure to traffic-related air pollution was causally linked to worsening asthma.2 The evidence was characterized as bordering on sufficient for a causal link with incident childhood asthma,2 whereas associations with adult-onset asthma, deteriorating lung function, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and the progression of atherosclerosis were deemed suggestive but insufficient to infer causality. Subsequent evidence shows a strengthened case for causal relationships between exposure to traffic-related air pollution and incident asthma, as summarized in a meta-analysis,3 and with lung cancer, as stated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer’s classification of diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans.4 Increasing support for the role of traffic-related air pollution in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is summarized in a recent scientific statement from the American Heart Association, which concluded that “traffic-related pollution as a whole appears to be a specific source associated with cardiovascular risk.”5 This conclusion is supported by experimental and epidemiologic evidence that suggests that air pollution leads to systemic inflammation, oxidative stress and imbalance in the autonomic nervous system.5

Exposure to traffic-related air pollution in Canada

Based on available data on census block points and the National Road Network,2,6 about 10 million people — 32% of the Canadian population — live in areas where they are exposed to traffic-related air pollution (exposure zones). These elevated exposure zones are defined as the 500 m on either side of highways (average daily traffic ≥ 18 000 vehicles) or the 100 m on either side of major urban roads (average daily traffic ≥ 15 000 vehicles, ≥ 2 lanes spanning several kilometres, speed limit > 50 km/h).6 Using alternative metrics gives a lower-bound estimate of 4.1 million people (people living within 100 m of a major road or highway; ~13% of the Canadian population) and an upper-bound estimate of 16.9 million people (people living within 500 m of a major road or highway; ~54% of the Canadian population) living in areas of high exposure. This high prevalence of exposure, in addition to evidence of associated health problems, suggests that traffic-related air pollution is a substantial public health concern in Canada and points to the need for policies to reduce population exposure.

Mitigating exposure and risks

Reducing exposure to a hazard that is deeply integrated within modern society is difficult and must be addressed with diverse, coordinated policies. In a review of the published and grey literature,6 we identified 4 broad and potentially overlapping mitigation strategies: reducing vehicle emissions; modifying existing infrastructure; land-use planning and transportation management; and encouraging behavioural change (Box 1). In the short term, policies and regulations that target existing infrastructure and vehicles are likely to be most effective in reducing exposure because they operate at the population level. In the long term, land-use planning that incorporates health impact assessments can influence the siting of new buildings or roads such that exposure is minimized.

Box 1:

Summary of potential policy options for reducing exposure to traffic-related air pollution

Population-level targets

  • Short-term options:

    • Implement inspection or maintenance programs to remove or retrofit “super emitters” responsible for disproportionate pollution.*

    • Implement policies to reduce traffic congestion.†

  • Long-term options:

    • Implement integrated land-use planning that incorporates health impact assessments.

    • Maintain low emission standards for new vehicles.*

    • Expand infrastructure for electric vehicles (e.g., charging stations).

Geographic targets

  • Short-term options:

    • Limit heavy truck traffic to specific routes away from areas with high population density and at times when areas may be less heavily populated to avoid high exposures in vulnerable populations.

    • Implement policies to reduce traffic congestion targeted to specific areas.

    • Install air filter systems in buildings that house vulnerable populations within 150 m of busy roads.‡

    • Separate active commuting from busy roads (e.g., create bicycle routes on minor roads).

    • Implement anti-idling and low-emission zones.

  • Long-term options:

    • Site new buildings that will house vulnerable populations (e.g., schools, daycares, retirement homes) at least 150 m from busy roads.‡

    • Implement land-use planning that incorporates local health impact assessments.

  • ↵* Inspection and maintenance programs exist in many parts of Canada, and increasingly stringent vehicle emissions standards have been implemented nationally.

  • ↵† Policies to improve vehicle flow; for example, modifying speed limits, altering traffic patterns to reduce stop-and-go traffic and policies to reduce overall traffic levels, such as high-occupancy vehicle lanes, transit improvements or road pricing.

  • ↵‡ Defined as average daily traffic > 15 000 vehicles.

Although studies directly measuring health benefits related to mitigating traffic emissions are limited, a recent review concluded that there is consistent evidence that interventions targeting air pollution in general lead to a reduction in adverse health effects.7 For example, a scheme in London, United Kingdom, in which drivers of vehicles operating within a “congestion charge zone” were charged a fee, reduced traffic volume and congestion, resulting in an estimated gain of 183 years of life per 100 000 residents within the zone over a 10-year period.8 Similarly, the establishment of low-emission zones and the consequent decrease in pollution in Rome, Italy, was estimated to have resulted in 921 years of life gained per 100 000 residents living near major roads over 10 years.9

Although these interventions alone benefit health,7 combining strategies can result in more cost-effective policies and greater improvements to population health. In particular, policies that encourage integrated land-use planning or that increase active transportation would lead to decreases in air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, and increases in physical activity. In the Midwestern United States, replacing short car trips (≤ 1.6 km) with active commuting had an estimated net health benefit of $4.94 billion per year from reduced air pollution and $8 billion per year from the combined benefits of improved air quality and physical fitness.10

Key points
  • Epidemiologic studies suggest causal links between exposure to traffic-related air pollution and negative effects on health.

  • One-third of Canadians live in areas with high exposure to traffic-related air pollution.

  • Exposure to traffic-related air pollution can be reduced by targeting vehicle emissions, modifying structures, land-use planning, transportation management and changing behaviour.

  • Policies to reduce Canadians’ exposure to traffic-related air pollution should be aligned with efforts to increase physical activity and decrease emissions related to climate change.

Acknowledgements

This commentary is based on a report prepared under a contract with Health Canada. The authors acknowledge feedback received from Health Canada staff and the National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Michael Brauer, Conor Reynolds and Perry Hystad received support from Health Canada to conduct a literature review on traffic-related air pollution and health. No other competing interests were declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Contributors: All of the authors contributed equally to the conception, design, analysis and interpretation of the material presented in the manuscript and to its drafting and revisions. All of the authors approved the final version submitted for publication.

References

  1. ↵
    No breathing room: national illness costs of air pollution. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Medical Association; 2008. Available: www.cma.ca/index.php/ci_id/86830/la_id/1.htm (accessed 2013 July 30).
  2. ↵
    Traffic-related air pollution: a critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. Final Version of Special Report No. 17. Boston (MA): Health Effects Institute; 2010. Available: http://pubs.healtheffects.org/view.php?id=334 (accessed 2012 July 30).
  3. ↵
    1. Anderson H,
    2. Favarato G,
    3. Atkinson RW
    . Long-term exposure to air pollution and the incidence of asthma: meta-analysis of cohort studies. Air Qual Atmos Health 2013;1:47–56.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Benbrahim-Tallaa L,
    2. Baan RA,
    3. Grosse Y,
    4. et al
    .; International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group. Carcinogenicity of diesel-engine and gasoline-engine exhausts and some nitroarenes. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:663–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Brook RD,
    2. Rajagopalan S,
    3. Pope CA III.,
    4. et al
    . American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: an update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;121:2331–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Brauer M,
    2. Reynolds CCO,
    3. Hystad P
    . Traffic-related air pollution and health: a Canadian perspective on scientific evidence and potential exposure-mitigation strategies. Vancouver (BC): University of British Columbia; 2012. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/41542 (accessed 2012 July 30).
  7. ↵
    1. Henschel S,
    2. Atkinson R,
    3. Zeka A,
    4. et al
    . Air pollution interventions and their impact on public health. Int J Public Health 2012;57: 757–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tonne C,
    2. Beevers S,
    3. Armstrong BG,
    4. et al
    . Air pollution and mortality benefits of the London Congestion Charge: spatial and socioeconomic inequalities. Occup Environ Med 2008;65:620–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Cesaroni G,
    2. Boogaard H,
    3. Jonkers S,
    4. et al
    . Health benefits of traffic-related air pollution reduction in different socioeconomic groups: the effect of low-emission zoning in Rome. Occup Environ Med 2012;69:133–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Grabow ML,
    2. Spak SN,
    3. Holloway T,
    4. et al
    . Air quality and exercise-related health benefits from reduced car travel in the Midwestern United States. Environ Health Perspect 2012;120: 68–76.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (18)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 18
10 Dec 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Traffic-related air pollution and health in Canada
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Traffic-related air pollution and health in Canada
Michael Brauer, Conor Reynolds, Perry Hystad
CMAJ Dec 2013, 185 (18) 1557-1558; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121568

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Traffic-related air pollution and health in Canada
Michael Brauer, Conor Reynolds, Perry Hystad
CMAJ Dec 2013, 185 (18) 1557-1558; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121568
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Exposure to traffic-related air pollution in Canada
    • Mitigating exposure and risks
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Adopting global guidelines for air pollution: protecting the health of Canadians
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ensuring timely genetic diagnosis in adults
  • The case for improving the detection and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea following stroke
  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Asthma
    • Environmental issues
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire