Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

CIHR to simplify open-funding programs

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ November 19, 2013 185 (17) 1484; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4619
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) is overhauling the grant programs under its open-funding envelope to encourage more “off-the-wall” research and to simplify the process of writing and reviewing grant applications.

“Our system truly wasn’t working,” says Dr. Jane Aubin, chief scientific officer at CIHR. “The workloads for applicants, the complexity of our programs and the burden on peer reviewers were all felt to be unsustainable.”

The agency will reorganize its existing suite of 12 grant programs into two broad funding streams: short-term project grants for research with a specific goal, and long-term foundation grants for researchers with records of excellence.

CIHR will also scrap its committee-based peer-review structure, which involved groups of researchers meeting together to discuss applications. Instead, it’s launching a web-based process to match grant applications to individual reviewers for remote vetting.

Some scientists believe the research community’s fundamental problem is lack of resources. With many researchers competing for limited funds, grant applicants are more likely to play it safe in the projects they pitch than to pursue ambitious work, says Philippe Gros, a CIHR distinguished investigator and professor of biochemistry at McGill University in Montréal, Quebec. “It creates a very high application pressure to deal with.”

Gros is also worried about the isolation involved in web-based peer review. “Personally, I would like more of a hybrid system in which you could have a web-based review with a much more structured role for panels,” he says.

CIHR will try to achieve that balance by maintaining a small number of committees whose members will meet during the final stages of peer review “to refocus on the applications that really need additional discussion,” says Aubin.

Others contend that remote peer review will result in fairer funding decisions by removing the influence of other committee members from individual reviewers’ judgments. The current system “where each committee has its own culture” and potential biases “has significant problems, including penalizing ambitious science and those trying to push the boundaries,” Brett Finlay, a CIHR distinguished investigator and professor of biochemistry and molecular biology at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, writes in an email.

Figure

CIHR is overhauling the grant programs under its open-funding envelope to encourage more “off-the-wall” research and to simplify its grant application process.

Image courtesy of © 2013 Thinkstock

CIHR has also found it increasingly difficult to populate enough review committees to keep up with the evolution of science, says Aubin.

The switch to remote peer review means CIHR can now match every application to multiple peer reviewers with the most appropriate expertise, without requiring them to attend committee meetings in Ottawa, Ontario, she explains. “You can also fish more outside Canada, because quite frankly … we get turned down by a lot [of international reviewers] because they can’t afford the time to spend a day and a half [travelling] to Canada and back.”

The reforms encourage more “novel, completely exciting, off-the-wall” research by providing longer funding windows to leading researchers through the new foundation track, says Aubin. Established investigators will receive up to seven years of funding, while new investigators can receive five years.

“Within those five to seven years, we’re asking researchers to do the most exciting, innovative research they can dream of so they don’t have to come back and convince peer reviewers again and again.”

Though many researchers and peer reviewers have embraced the simplicity of the two funding streams, says Aubin, some question changing the peer-review process at the same time.

“There is insufficient evidence that [the reforms] will produce higher quality review of grant proposals than the current system, and the proposed pilot experiments will not evaluate peer review quality over the timeframes that are currently proposed,” Philip Hieter, director of the Michael Smith Laboratories at the University of British Columbia, writes in an email. Hieter wants CIHR to delay the peer review changes until they are evaluated.

Given that 45% of CIHR’s open-funding envelope will be distributed to 25% of the principal investigators through foundation grants, “the need for high-quality review is even more important,” he wrote.

CIHR will launch the first foundation grant competition in fall 2014, and the first project grant competition in spring 2014.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (17)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 17
19 Nov 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CIHR to simplify open-funding programs
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CIHR to simplify open-funding programs
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Nov 2013, 185 (17) 1484; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4619

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
CIHR to simplify open-funding programs
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Nov 2013, 185 (17) 1484; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4619
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health services

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire