Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Doctors among early adopters of Google Glass

Wendy Glauser
CMAJ November 05, 2013 185 (16) 1385; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4607
Wendy Glauser
Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As some doctors tinker with their exclusively procured Google Glass devices, the medical community is being told to prepare for a future where life-saving information is available at a glance.

The device looks like a pair of eyeglasses without lenses and has a tiny computer and camera built into the frame. When users look up and to the right, they see a holographic screen that appears to be floating in front of them. Google Glass is operated through voice commands, head tilts and a touchpad on the side. It can take pictures, make video calls and enables hands-free web searching.

Some medical applications being explored include remote mentoring, viewing lab reports without looking away from patients and live streaming surgeries to medical students. Despite the buzz, however, there are constraints to medicine’s adoption of Google Glass, including privacy regulations and a reluctance among some hospital administrations to embrace new technologies.

In May, Google shipped 8000 devices to early adopters in the United States. Some of them are medical professionals, though Google spokesperson Aaron Brindle wasn’t able to say how many devices ended up in hospital settings.

Chris Madison, a simulation technician at Hartford Hospital in Connecticut, is among the early adopters. He is part of a pilot study in which a group of medical residents treats patient mannequins by reading monitors and checking lab results, while a second group has vital signs, medication, lab results and equipment malfunctions beamed to their wearable computers.

“The medical devices out there could potentially talk to this one system, and display all this information on Glass,” says Madison.

Other physicians are excited about how Glass could revolutionize medical education in areas such as surgery. “Students have to go to the operating room and peek behind your shoulder and try to see what you’re seeing in a small field,” explains Dr. Rafael Grossmann, a trauma surgeon at Eastern Maine Medical Center in Bangor. “With Glass, they get to see procedures from the surgeon’s perspective.”

Figure

Some doctors think Google Glass could be a helpful educational tool when put on a patient or mannequin to allow residents to see from the patient’s perspective

Image courtesy of ETSU Photographic Services

The wearable camera is also a helpful educational tool when put on a patient or mannequin because it allows residents to view their bedside manner from the patient’s perspective, says Dr. Martin Olsen, the residency program director for obstetrics and gynecology at East Tennessee State University’s medical school in Johnson City. “The learner sees themselves and thinks, ‘I’d be a better doctor if I did x, y and z,’” says Olsen, who recently incorporated Glass into training.

Despite the early adopters’ excitement, however, it’s questionable whether many hospitals will make use of the James Bond–worthy technology. Dr. Steve Hawrylyshyn, a resident in family medicine at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, Ontario, with a Master of Science degree in e-health, wrote in an email that Glass has “very neat and beneficial uses” but “even some of the more technologically advanced hospitals are still slow to digitalize.”

Another limit to incorporating Glass into health care is that medical devices are proprietary, adds Madison. Although it is feasible to integrate Glass with electronic medical records, which have centralized databases, the barriers are greater for machines like defibrillators, infusion pumps and heart monitors.

There are also technical shortcomings to be worked out — the battery life allows for only about 45 minutes of recording, for example.

A more important barrier may be hospital legislation. Currently, doctors can’t upload patient data onto Glass because that information is streamed through Google’s server, and the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act does not allow a third party to access patient information.

“The technology is exponentially leaping forward at a pace that regulation is not keeping up with,” says Grossmann. “But it will happen. It will just take time.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 16
5 Nov 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Doctors among early adopters of Google Glass
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Doctors among early adopters of Google Glass
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Nov 2013, 185 (16) 1385; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4607

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Doctors among early adopters of Google Glass
Wendy Glauser
CMAJ Nov 2013, 185 (16) 1385; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4607
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A new age for undergraduate surgical teaching
  • Wearable technology in the operating room: a systematic review
  • Use of Mobile Devices, Social Media, and Crowdsourcing as Digital Strategies to Improve Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Academic medicine
    • Health technology

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire