Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

Ditching the lifeboat approach to medical ethics

Myra Butler
CMAJ October 15, 2013 185 (15) 1351; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.130762
Myra Butler
Master’s of health sciences candidate, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Thieves of Virtue: When Bioethics Stole Medicine. Tom Koch. MIT Press; 2012

As a recent medical school graduate, I have vivid memories of the confusion and distress many of us felt after medical ethics lectures. Our professors taught autonomy as the prime virtue. But if a patient’s competence was impaired or resources became short, professors instructed us to apply utilitarian principles, to the point of ignoring patient autonomy altogether. This seemed arbitrary and subjective. In the face of these contradictions, how could we hope to make ethical decisions in difficult clinical settings?

Tom Koch describes the development of many such paradoxes in bioethics. He methodically reveals the field’s foundations and shows how these led to difficulties like the ones we often identify in our medical ethics classes.

Koch begins by imagining a typical student trying to understand a lecture on ethics and objecting to reading philosophy from “a lot of dead Germans.” Thieves of Virtue is written for the sake of that student, outlining the historical and philosophical underpinnings of modern bioethics piece by piece, story by story.

The leading medical ethics textbook, Principles of Biomedical Ethics, begins with the assertion that in the 20th century, developments in the biological and health sciences have rendered the traditional Hippocratic medical ethic “inadequate for contemporary biomedical ethics.”1 The central metaphor of this modern ethic is that of a lifeboat. In other words, when resources are limited and there are conflicting imperatives, you must decide who goes in the lifeboat and who does not. In this climate, the tool bioethicists bring to the table is that of philosophy, including the works of John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant.

Figure1
Image courtesy of MIT Press

The need for a new medical ethic, according to Koch, however, is not due to the failure of traditional medical ethics, but rather the neoliberal push for a utilitarian ethic. The important question for bioethics, he argues, is not what to do when you get into a lifeboat situation because of scarce resources, but what social constructs led to these situations in the first place? Why were there not enough lifeboats for all the passengers on the ship? Why was the ship travelling so fast in iceberg-infested waters?

Koch argues that we often struggle with resolving problems we have ourselves created. Although we need immediate answers in the clinical realm, the deeper questions of how to avoid such situations in the first place also require attention.

The importance of medical research also plays a prominent role in the story Koch tells. The atrocities condemned at the Nuremberg trials were not solely a German phenomenon but have deep roots throughout the Western world. In Germany, as Koch sees it, the philosophy was taken to its logical endpoint: experimentation on the disabled or imprisoned, a morally repugnant consequence. As a result, the world attempted to establish safeguards to prevent further such abuse. But the philosophical foundation for these actions remains unchallenged, Koch says, arguing that similar dangers still exist for the vulnerable.

Although Thieves of Virtue asks important questions, it is bound to generate controversy. Essentially, Koch questions the entire foundation of biomedical ethics and its use in society. In other words, bioethicists may be out of a job. Koch’s storytelling is engaging, peppered by biographies of the major players on the bioethical scene, and interesting accounts of lawsuits and clinical cases. The book creates a comprehensive picture of the current state of bioethics in medicine and in medical research.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Beauchamp C
    . Principles of biomedical ethics. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2001.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (15)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 15
15 Oct 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ditching the lifeboat approach to medical ethics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Ditching the lifeboat approach to medical ethics
Myra Butler
CMAJ Oct 2013, 185 (15) 1351; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130762

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Ditching the lifeboat approach to medical ethics
Myra Butler
CMAJ Oct 2013, 185 (15) 1351; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130762
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • For Serena Williams, and my mother
  • The problem of standardized breast cancer narratives
  • Two poems on pain
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical ethics

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire