Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Salon

Physician kindness as sincere benevolence

Stephen A. Buetow
CMAJ July 09, 2013 185 (10) 928; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121457
Stephen A. Buetow
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
PhD
Roles: Associate Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

An attractive, physically healthy woman sits beside her physician, her generalized anxiety having brought her to the point of tears. To convey concern and offer comfort, her physician reaches out to gently touch her forearm — but he hesitates. Might this physical gesture, he wonders, reflect his need to connect, as much as — or more than — hers? Might it compromise his clinical detachment? Might the frightened woman worry that it cloaks sexual interest; shows favouritism or weakness; undermines her capacity for self-care by treating her like a child; or appears excessive or insincere?

This scenario draws attention to fear of misinterpretation as one barrier to recent calls to reconnect medicine to a culture of human kindness.1 This fear, the modern importance attached to scientific objectivity, and a risk to physicians of “compassion fatigue” can frequently overwhelm the impulse of physicians to draw closer to their patients. Although physicians spontaneously displaying emotions can help to show patients how much their physician cares, some physicians continue to fear doing just that.

As part of a movement to rehumanize medicine, Faust2 has defined kindness as a way of helping without necessarily feeling the emotional engagement required of compassion or empathy. This definition makes kindness easier to apply than compassion, and permits physicians to “act as if they care … without taking on the stressful emotions that emanate from being compassionate or empathetic”.2 For me, this perspective errs because most patients want a physician who genuinely cares — and most physicians do care.

For me, kindness is sincere benevolence that need not be self-sacrificing.

Rather than faking it, physicians’ kindness toward patients must be genuine and include an element of physician self-care. Allow me to elaborate. Physician kindness opens up an opportunity for “a mutual experience of joining that results in a sensation of wholeness.”3 This experience of joining matters to both parties because, as the African concept of “ubuntu” explains, a person’s humanity depends on their connectedness to others. Kindness by the physician is ubuntu. Felt rather than chosen by the physician, it is “goodness without [conscious, reasoned] thought.”4 Its sincerity comes from the physician instinctively accepting their own vulnerability in the act of reaching out to the patient. A consequent, shared feeling of wholeness may satisfy a mutual need for emotional connection and transform suffering into profound, positive emotions and healing.

Figure
Image courtesy of © 2013 Thinkstock

Physician kindness is further connected to justice, which includes a principle of equality. According to this principle, physicians and patients are moral equals whose equal interests deserve equal consideration. Substitution of “equal consideration of equal interests” for the dominant principle of the “primacy of patient welfare” can be further justified by the interrelated interests of the physician and patient in doing what feels morally right and produces good consequences.

Applied to the above case example, the physician perceives the patient as having an interest in feeling understood and reassured. Responding to this interest requires the physician to have, and act appropriately on, his own emotional impulse for human connection. His interest is important for the patient’s sake but also his own — because in touching her arm, he is touched. Thus, both parties have an equal interest in the interaction and in feeling connected, which helps to mitigate barriers to kindness such as fear of showing favouritism or weakness, and give moral strength to the physician.

In turn, the physician can minimize the risk of his patient reacting negatively to his touching of her arm, by finding a midpoint between too much kindness — as suggested by emotions such as over-sentimentality or patronizing acts such as patting the patient’s arm — and too little kindness as revealed by a lack of obvious concern. Patients are able to spot this midpoint. They can discern the difference between “taught or professional kindness (a “skill”), and natural kindness — and we all know which we prefer.”5

Moral values such as kindness can indeed be difficult to cultivate. However, physicians should have no less capacity than others to shape their own character, for example through training and practise in moral development and in felt attitudes such as sensitivity. Physicians can then feel more secure about implementing person-centred values like kindness, and about how patients may interpret their actions. Physicians can become enabled to ground their care habitually in kindness as an experience of sincere benevolence, without letting their “heart” rule their “head.”

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ballatt J,
    2. Campling P
    . Intelligent kindness: reforming the culture of healthcare. London (UK): Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2011.
  2. ↵
    1. Faust HS
    . Kindness, not compassion, in healthcare. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2009;18:287–99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Suchman AL,
    2. Matthews DA
    . What makes the patient–doctor relationship therapeutic? Exploring the connexional dimension of medical care. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:125–30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Levinas E
    . In the time of the nations. Indianapolis (IN): Indiana University Press; 1994.
  5. ↵
    1. Pickering WG
    . Kindness, prescribed and natural, in medicine. J Med Ethics 1997;23:116–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 10
9 Jul 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician kindness as sincere benevolence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physician kindness as sincere benevolence
Stephen A. Buetow
CMAJ Jul 2013, 185 (10) 928; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121457

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Physician kindness as sincere benevolence
Stephen A. Buetow
CMAJ Jul 2013, 185 (10) 928; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121457
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
  • Revisiting Rodriguez
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers
    • Patient education

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire